Tizard Centre, University of Kent, Canterbury, CT2 7NF, UK.
J Autism Dev Disord. 2023 Aug;53(8):3151-3179. doi: 10.1007/s10803-022-05590-3. Epub 2022 May 30.
The purpose of this paper was to determine whether recommendations made by King & Murphy (Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 44:2717-2733, 2014) in their review of the evidence on autistic people in contact with the criminal justice system (CJS) have been addressed. Research published since 2013 was systematically examined and synthesised. The quality of 47 papers was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Findings suggest a limited amount of good quality research has been conducted that has focused on improving our understanding of autistic people in contact with the CJS since 2013. Methodological limitations make direct comparisons between autistic and non-autistic offenders difficult. Autistic people commit a range of crimes and appear to have unique characteristics that warrant further exploration (i.e., vulnerabilities, motivations for offending).
本文旨在确定 King 和 Murphy(《自闭症与发育障碍杂志》44:2717-2733, 2014)在其对接触刑事司法系统(CJS)的自闭症患者证据的综述中提出的建议是否已得到解决。系统地审查和综合了自 2013 年以来发表的研究。使用混合方法评估工具评估了 47 篇论文的质量。研究结果表明,自 2013 年以来,已经进行了有限数量的高质量研究,重点是提高我们对接触 CJS 的自闭症患者的理解。由于方法学上的限制,很难在自闭症和非自闭症罪犯之间进行直接比较。自闭症患者犯下各种罪行,似乎具有独特的特征,值得进一步探索(即,脆弱性、犯罪动机)。