把头埋在沙子里：当代澳大利亚人对引产的态度。
Head in the sand: Contemporary Australian attitudes towards induction of labour.
机构信息
College of Medicine & Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.
Obstetrics & Gynaecology, The Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
出版信息
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Aug;62(4):483-486. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13512. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
Abstract
Ambivalence in Australian thought on induction of labour, despite recent evidence, stands out in contrast to ever-increasing rates of this intervention. As consent obligations on information provision have crystallised in maternity care, this article examines whether consumer-led expectations and legal obligations may precipitate change to end the cultural stigma around induction of labour.
摘要
尽管最近有证据表明，但澳大利亚在引产问题上的矛盾态度与这种干预手段的使用频率不断增加形成鲜明对比。由于产妇护理中关于信息提供的同意义务已经明确，本文探讨了消费者主导的期望和法律义务是否可能促使人们改变对引产的文化观念。
相似文献
1
Head in the sand: Contemporary Australian attitudes towards induction of labour.把头埋在沙子里：当代澳大利亚人对引产的态度。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Aug;62(4):483-486. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13512. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
2
Five-year trends in induction of labour in a large Australian metropolitan maternity service.澳大利亚大型城市妇产服务机构中引产的 5 年趋势
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Jun;62(3):407-412. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13486. Epub 2022 Feb 20.
3
'I'm having a baby not a labour': Sense of coherence and women's attitudes towards labour and birth.“我怀的是孩子，不是工作”：连贯性感知与女性对分娩的态度。
Midwifery. 2019 Dec;79:102529. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2019.102529. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
4
An evaluation of the quality of care for women with low risk pregnanacy: The use of evidence-based practice during labour and childbirth in four public hospitals in Tehran.低风险妊娠女性护理质量评估：德黑兰四家公立医院分娩期间循证实践的应用
Midwifery. 2015 Nov;31(11):1045-53. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2015.07.003. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
5
Attitudes of pregnant women and healthcare professionals to labour induction and obtaining consent for labour induction.孕妇和医护人员对引产的态度以及获得引产同意的情况。
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2021 Nov;77:64-75. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.008. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
6
Re: Intrapartum intervention rates and perinatal outcomes following induction of labour compared to expectant management at term from an Australian perinatal centre.回复：与澳大利亚一家围产期中心足月时的期待管理相比，引产时的产时干预率和围产期结局。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017 Oct;57(5):E9. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12658.
7
Exploring unwarranted clinical variation: The attitudes of midwives and obstetric medical staff regarding induction of labour and planned caesarean section.探讨不必要的临床差异：助产士和产科医务人员对引产和计划剖宫产的态度。
Women Birth. 2021 Jul;34(4):352-361. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2020.07.003. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
8
Response to Re: Intrapartum intervention rates and perinatal outcomes following induction of labour compared to expectant management at term from an Australian perinatal centre.对《关于澳大利亚一家围产期中心足月引产与期待管理相比的产时干预率及围产期结局》一文回复的回应
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017 Oct;57(5):E10. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12677.
9
Labour induction for late-term or post-term pregnancy.晚期或过期妊娠的引产
Women Birth. 2016 Aug;29(4):394-8. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2016.01.007. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
10
Weight stigma in maternity care: women's experiences and care providers' attitudes.产妇保健中的体重污名：女性的经历和医护人员的态度。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 Jan 22;13:19. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-19.
本文引用的文献
1
Antenatal and intrapartum consent: Implications of the NSW Consent Manual 2020.产前和产时同意书：2020 年新南威尔士同意手册的影响。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2021 Oct;61(5):802-805. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13397. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
2
Intrapartum interventions and outcomes for women and children following induction of labour at term in uncomplicated pregnancies: a 16-year population-based linked data study.足月单胎妊娠产妇行引产时的产时干预措施和母婴结局：一项基于人群的 16 年关联数据研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 May 31;11(6):e047040. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047040.
3
Birth by caesarean section and educational achievement in adolescents.剖宫产分娩与青少年的教育成就。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2021 Jun;61(3):386-393. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13276. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
4
Induction of labour at or beyond 37 weeks' gestation.妊娠37周及以后引产。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 15;7(7):CD004945. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004945.pub5.
5
Inpatient versus outpatient induction of labour: a systematic review and meta-analysis.门诊与住院引产的比较：系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Jun 30;20(1):382. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03060-1.
6
Health resource utilization of labor induction versus expectant management.引产与期待治疗的卫生资源利用。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Apr;222(4):369.e1-369.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.01.002. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
7
Reducing caesarean delivery: An economic evaluation of routine induction of labour at 39 weeks in low-risk nulliparous women.降低剖宫产率：低危初产妇 39 周常规引产的经济学评价。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2020 Jan;34(1):3-11. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12621. Epub 2019 Dec 29.
8
Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks compared with expectant management: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.选择性在 39 周时引产与期待管理相比：队列研究的荟萃分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Oct;221(4):304-310. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.02.046. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
9
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 765: Avoidance of Nonmedically Indicated Early-Term Deliveries and Associated Neonatal Morbidities.美国妇产科医师学会委员会意见 No.765：避免无医学指征的早期早产及其相关新生儿并发症。
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Feb;133(2):e156-e163. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003076.
10
Why ARRIVE should not thrive in Australia.为何“ARRIVE”在澳大利亚不应蓬勃发展。
Women Birth. 2018 Oct;31(5):339-340. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2018.08.168. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
Zotero 插件