• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

青少年和成人饮食失调的筛查:美国预防服务工作组的证据报告和系统评价

Screening for Eating Disorders in Adolescents and Adults: Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.

作者信息

Feltner Cynthia, Peat Christine, Reddy Shivani, Riley Sean, Berkman Nancy, Middleton Jennifer Cook, Balio Casey, Coker-Schwimmer Manny, Jonas Daniel E

机构信息

RTI International-University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Evidence-based Practice Center, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.

Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

出版信息

JAMA. 2022 Mar 15;327(11):1068-1082. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.1807.

DOI:10.1001/jama.2022.1807
PMID:35289875
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Eating disorders are associated with adverse health and social outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To review the evidence on screening for eating disorders in adolescents and adults to inform the US Preventive Services Task Force.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, and trial registries through December 19, 2020; surveillance through January 1, 2022.

STUDY SELECTION

English-language studies of screening test accuracy, randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of screening or interventions for eating disorders in populations with screen-detected or previously untreated eating disorders (trials limited to populations who are underweight were ineligible).

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Dual review of abstracts, full-text articles, and study quality. Meta-analysis of test accuracy studies and intervention trials.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Test accuracy, eating disorder symptom severity, quality of life, depression, and harms.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven studies were included (N = 10 773); 3 (n = 1073) limited to adolescents (mean or median age, 14-15 years). No study directly evaluated the benefits and harms of screening. Seventeen studies (n = 6804) evaluated screening test accuracy. The SCOFF questionnaire (cut point ≥2) had a pooled sensitivity of 84% (95% CI, 74% to 90%) and pooled specificity of 80% (95% CI, 65% to 89%) in adults (10 studies, n = 3684). Forty RCTs (n = 3969) evaluated interventions for eating disorders; none enrolled a screen-detected population. Lisdexamfetamine for binge eating disorder (4 RCTs; n = 900) was associated with larger reductions in eating disorder symptom severity on the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale modified for binge eating (YBOCS-BE) than placebo (pooled mean difference, -5.75 [95% CI, -8.32 to -3.17]). Two RCTs (n = 465) of topiramate for binge eating disorder found larger reductions in YBOCS-BE scores associated with topiramate than placebo, from -6.40 (95% CI, -8.16 to -4.64) to -2.55 (95% CI, -4.22 to -0.88). Nine pharmacotherapy trials (n = 2006) reported on harms. Compared with placebo, lisdexamfetamine was associated with higher rates of dry mouth, headache, and insomnia, and topiramate was associated with higher rates of paresthesia, taste perversion, confusion, and concentration difficulty. Twenty-four trials (n = 1644) assessed psychological interventions. Guided self-help for binge eating disorder improved eating disorder symptom severity more than control (pooled standardized mean difference, -0.96 [95% CI, -1.26 to -0.67]) (5 studies, n = 391). Evidence on other interventions was limited.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

No studies directly assessed the benefits and harms of screening. The SCOFF questionnaire had adequate accuracy for detecting eating disorders among adults. No treatment trials enrolled screen-detected populations; guided self-help, lisdexamfetamine, and topiramate were effective for reducing eating disorder symptom severity among referred populations with binge eating disorder, but pharmacotherapies were also associated with harms.

摘要

重要性

饮食失调与不良的健康和社会后果相关。

目的

回顾关于青少年和成年人饮食失调筛查的证据,为美国预防服务工作组提供信息。

数据来源

截至2020年12月19日的MEDLINE、Cochrane图书馆、PsycINFO及试验注册库;截至2022年1月1日的监测数据。

研究选择

关于筛查测试准确性的英文研究、针对筛查出或既往未治疗的饮食失调人群进行饮食失调筛查或干预的随机临床试验(RCT)(仅限于体重过轻人群的试验不符合要求)。

数据提取与综合

对摘要、全文文章及研究质量进行双人审查。对测试准确性研究和干预试验进行荟萃分析。

主要结局和测量指标

测试准确性、饮食失调症状严重程度、生活质量、抑郁及不良事件。

结果

纳入57项研究(N = 10773);3项(n = 1073)仅限于青少年(平均或中位年龄14 - 15岁)。没有研究直接评估筛查的益处和危害。17项研究(n = 6804)评估了筛查测试准确性。在成年人中(10项研究,n = 3684),SCOFF问卷(切点≥2)的合并灵敏度为84%(95%CI,74%至90%),合并特异度为80%(95%CI,65%至89%)。40项RCT(n = 3969)评估了饮食失调的干预措施;均未纳入筛查出的人群。用于治疗暴饮暴食症的赖右苯丙胺(4项RCT;n = 900)与安慰剂相比,在针对暴饮暴食修改后的耶鲁 - 布朗强迫量表(YBOCS - BE)上饮食失调症状严重程度的降低幅度更大(合并平均差,-5.75 [95%CI,-8.32至-3.17])。两项关于托吡酯治疗暴饮暴食症的RCT(n = 465)发现,与安慰剂相比,托吡酯使YBOCS - BE评分降低幅度更大,从-6.40(95%CI,-8.16至-4.64)降至-2.55(95%CI,-4.22至-0.88)。9项药物治疗试验(n = 2006)报告了不良事件。与安慰剂相比,赖右苯丙胺与口干、头痛和失眠的发生率较高相关,托吡酯与感觉异常、味觉异常、意识模糊和注意力不集中的发生率较高相关。24项试验(n = 1644)评估了心理干预措施。针对暴饮暴食症的引导式自助比对照组更能改善饮食失调症状严重程度(合并标准化平均差,-0.96 [95%CI,-1.26至-0.67])(5项研究,n = 391)。关于其他干预措施的证据有限。

结论与相关性

没有研究直接评估筛查的益处和危害。SCOFF问卷在检测成年人饮食失调方面有足够的准确性。没有治疗试验纳入筛查出的人群;引导式自助、赖右苯丙胺和托吡酯对降低转诊的暴饮暴食症人群的饮食失调症状严重程度有效,但药物治疗也与不良事件相关。

相似文献

1
Screening for Eating Disorders in Adolescents and Adults: Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.青少年和成人饮食失调的筛查:美国预防服务工作组的证据报告和系统评价
JAMA. 2022 Mar 15;327(11):1068-1082. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.1807.
2
3
4
Screening for Depression and Suicide Risk in Children and Adolescents: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.儿童和青少年抑郁和自杀风险筛查:美国预防服务工作组的更新证据报告和系统评价。
JAMA. 2022 Oct 18;328(15):1543-1556. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.16310.
5
6
Screening for Anxiety in Children and Adolescents: Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.儿童和青少年焦虑症筛查:美国预防服务工作组的证据报告和系统评价。
JAMA. 2022 Oct 11;328(14):1445-1455. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.16303.
7
8
9
Screening for Intimate Partner Violence, Elder Abuse, and Abuse of Vulnerable Adults: Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.筛查亲密伴侣暴力、虐待老人和虐待弱势成年人:美国预防服务工作组的证据报告和系统评价。
JAMA. 2018 Oct 23;320(16):1688-1701. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.13212.
10

引用本文的文献

1
The Effects of Comparisons of Physical Appearance on Social Media and Social Approval on Eating Attitudes.社交媒体上的外貌比较及社会认可对饮食态度的影响
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2025 Jun 25;18:2091-2105. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S517472. eCollection 2025.
2
Associations between intraindividual variability in weekday-weekend sleep timing and duration and eating disorder pathology.工作日与周末睡眠时间和时长的个体内变异性与饮食失调病理学之间的关联。
Eat Behav. 2025 Apr;57:101959. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2025.101959. Epub 2025 Feb 16.
3
Translation and Adaptation of the SCOFF Questionnaire to the Greek Language (G-SCOFF) Using a Tertiary-Setting Adolescent Sample.
使用三级医疗机构青少年样本将SCOFF问卷翻译并改编为希腊语(G-SCOFF)
Nutrients. 2025 Jan 19;17(2):347. doi: 10.3390/nu17020347.
4
The Impact of Social Media on Eating Disorder Risk and Self-Esteem Among Adolescents and Young Adults: A Psychosocial Analysis in Individuals Aged 16-25.社交媒体对青少年和青年饮食失调风险及自尊的影响:16至25岁个体的社会心理分析
Nutrients. 2025 Jan 8;17(2):219. doi: 10.3390/nu17020219.
5
Diagnostic accuracy of screening tests for eating disorders in adolescents and adults in primary health care: protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.初级卫生保健中青少年和成人饮食失调筛查测试的诊断准确性:系统评价与荟萃分析方案
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 20;14(12):e086361. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086361.
6
A guide to the community management of paediatric eating disorders.儿童饮食失调的社区管理指南。
Paediatr Child Health. 2024 Dec 12;29(7):446-462. doi: 10.1093/pch/pxae037. eCollection 2024 Nov.
7
Un guide pour la prise en charge communautaire des troubles des conduites alimentaires en pédiatrie.儿科饮食行为障碍社区管理指南。
Paediatr Child Health. 2024 Dec 12;29(7):446-462. doi: 10.1093/pch/pxae039. eCollection 2024 Nov.
8
Exploring validated strategies for screening for eating disorders in adolescents and adults in primary health care: a scoping review protocol.探索在初级医疗保健中筛选青少年和成年人进食障碍的已验证策略:范围综述方案。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02711-0.
9
Family Meals and Social Eating Behavior and Their Association with Disordered Eating among Spanish Adolescents: The EHDLA Study.家庭用餐和社交进食行为及其与西班牙青少年饮食失调的关系:EHDLA 研究。
Nutrients. 2024 Mar 26;16(7):951. doi: 10.3390/nu16070951.
10
Risk factors of disordered eating in adolescent girls from a community sample: a multidimensional approach.来自社区样本的青春期女孩饮食失调的风险因素:一种多维度方法。
Consort Psychiatr. 2023 Jul 10;4(2):21-39. doi: 10.17816/CP6132.