Suppr超能文献

青少年和成人饮食失调的筛查:美国预防服务工作组的证据报告和系统评价

Screening for Eating Disorders in Adolescents and Adults: Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.

作者信息

Feltner Cynthia, Peat Christine, Reddy Shivani, Riley Sean, Berkman Nancy, Middleton Jennifer Cook, Balio Casey, Coker-Schwimmer Manny, Jonas Daniel E

机构信息

RTI International-University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Evidence-based Practice Center, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.

Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

出版信息

JAMA. 2022 Mar 15;327(11):1068-1082. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.1807.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Eating disorders are associated with adverse health and social outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To review the evidence on screening for eating disorders in adolescents and adults to inform the US Preventive Services Task Force.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, and trial registries through December 19, 2020; surveillance through January 1, 2022.

STUDY SELECTION

English-language studies of screening test accuracy, randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of screening or interventions for eating disorders in populations with screen-detected or previously untreated eating disorders (trials limited to populations who are underweight were ineligible).

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Dual review of abstracts, full-text articles, and study quality. Meta-analysis of test accuracy studies and intervention trials.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Test accuracy, eating disorder symptom severity, quality of life, depression, and harms.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven studies were included (N = 10 773); 3 (n = 1073) limited to adolescents (mean or median age, 14-15 years). No study directly evaluated the benefits and harms of screening. Seventeen studies (n = 6804) evaluated screening test accuracy. The SCOFF questionnaire (cut point ≥2) had a pooled sensitivity of 84% (95% CI, 74% to 90%) and pooled specificity of 80% (95% CI, 65% to 89%) in adults (10 studies, n = 3684). Forty RCTs (n = 3969) evaluated interventions for eating disorders; none enrolled a screen-detected population. Lisdexamfetamine for binge eating disorder (4 RCTs; n = 900) was associated with larger reductions in eating disorder symptom severity on the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale modified for binge eating (YBOCS-BE) than placebo (pooled mean difference, -5.75 [95% CI, -8.32 to -3.17]). Two RCTs (n = 465) of topiramate for binge eating disorder found larger reductions in YBOCS-BE scores associated with topiramate than placebo, from -6.40 (95% CI, -8.16 to -4.64) to -2.55 (95% CI, -4.22 to -0.88). Nine pharmacotherapy trials (n = 2006) reported on harms. Compared with placebo, lisdexamfetamine was associated with higher rates of dry mouth, headache, and insomnia, and topiramate was associated with higher rates of paresthesia, taste perversion, confusion, and concentration difficulty. Twenty-four trials (n = 1644) assessed psychological interventions. Guided self-help for binge eating disorder improved eating disorder symptom severity more than control (pooled standardized mean difference, -0.96 [95% CI, -1.26 to -0.67]) (5 studies, n = 391). Evidence on other interventions was limited.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

No studies directly assessed the benefits and harms of screening. The SCOFF questionnaire had adequate accuracy for detecting eating disorders among adults. No treatment trials enrolled screen-detected populations; guided self-help, lisdexamfetamine, and topiramate were effective for reducing eating disorder symptom severity among referred populations with binge eating disorder, but pharmacotherapies were also associated with harms.

摘要

重要性

饮食失调与不良的健康和社会后果相关。

目的

回顾关于青少年和成年人饮食失调筛查的证据,为美国预防服务工作组提供信息。

数据来源

截至2020年12月19日的MEDLINE、Cochrane图书馆、PsycINFO及试验注册库;截至2022年1月1日的监测数据。

研究选择

关于筛查测试准确性的英文研究、针对筛查出或既往未治疗的饮食失调人群进行饮食失调筛查或干预的随机临床试验(RCT)(仅限于体重过轻人群的试验不符合要求)。

数据提取与综合

对摘要、全文文章及研究质量进行双人审查。对测试准确性研究和干预试验进行荟萃分析。

主要结局和测量指标

测试准确性、饮食失调症状严重程度、生活质量、抑郁及不良事件。

结果

纳入57项研究(N = 10773);3项(n = 1073)仅限于青少年(平均或中位年龄14 - 15岁)。没有研究直接评估筛查的益处和危害。17项研究(n = 6804)评估了筛查测试准确性。在成年人中(10项研究,n = 3684),SCOFF问卷(切点≥2)的合并灵敏度为84%(95%CI,74%至90%),合并特异度为80%(95%CI,65%至89%)。40项RCT(n = 3969)评估了饮食失调的干预措施;均未纳入筛查出的人群。用于治疗暴饮暴食症的赖右苯丙胺(4项RCT;n = 900)与安慰剂相比,在针对暴饮暴食修改后的耶鲁 - 布朗强迫量表(YBOCS - BE)上饮食失调症状严重程度的降低幅度更大(合并平均差,-5.75 [95%CI,-8.32至-3.17])。两项关于托吡酯治疗暴饮暴食症的RCT(n = 465)发现,与安慰剂相比,托吡酯使YBOCS - BE评分降低幅度更大,从-6.40(95%CI,-8.16至-4.64)降至-2.55(95%CI,-4.22至-0.88)。9项药物治疗试验(n = 2006)报告了不良事件。与安慰剂相比,赖右苯丙胺与口干、头痛和失眠的发生率较高相关,托吡酯与感觉异常、味觉异常、意识模糊和注意力不集中的发生率较高相关。24项试验(n = 1644)评估了心理干预措施。针对暴饮暴食症的引导式自助比对照组更能改善饮食失调症状严重程度(合并标准化平均差,-0.96 [95%CI,-1.26至-0.67])(5项研究,n = 391)。关于其他干预措施的证据有限。

结论与相关性

没有研究直接评估筛查的益处和危害。SCOFF问卷在检测成年人饮食失调方面有足够的准确性。没有治疗试验纳入筛查出的人群;引导式自助、赖右苯丙胺和托吡酯对降低转诊的暴饮暴食症人群的饮食失调症状严重程度有效,但药物治疗也与不良事件相关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验