Hopkins L J, Moss D W
Clin Chim Acta. 1979 Mar 15;92(3):443-9. doi: 10.1016/0009-8981(79)90225-0.
The methods of Rosalki and Tarlow and the Scandinavian Committee on Enzymes for the determination of gamma-glutamyltransferase activity in serum have been compared, with an automatic reaction-rate analyzer in which the reaction is initiated by the addition of a concentrated solution of gamma-glutamyl-p-nitroanilide. Results are approximately 4% lower by the Scandinavian method, because of its lower substrate concentration. However, both methods are of comparable reproducibility. The greater stability of the more dilute substrate solution specified in the Scandinavian method has been confirmed, but attempts to stabilize solutions of gamma-glutamyl-p-nitroanilide at the higher concentrations recommended by Rosalki and Tarlow by the addition of organic solvents were accompanied by some enzyme inhibition. The comparative instability of the substrate solutionof Rosalki and Tarlow is unlikely to lead to erroneous results; however, the Scandinavian formulation offers the advantage of a more economical use of reagents, at the expense of a small and probably unimportant reduction in sensitivity.
已使用自动反应速率分析仪对罗萨尔基和塔尔洛的方法以及斯堪的纳维亚酶学委员会测定血清中γ-谷氨酰转移酶活性的方法进行了比较,该分析仪通过添加γ-谷氨酰对硝基苯胺浓溶液来启动反应。由于底物浓度较低,斯堪的纳维亚方法的结果约低4%。然而,两种方法的重现性相当。已证实斯堪的纳维亚方法中规定的较稀底物溶液具有更高的稳定性,但试图通过添加有机溶剂来稳定罗萨尔基和塔尔洛推荐的较高浓度的γ-谷氨酰对硝基苯胺溶液时,会伴随一些酶抑制作用。罗萨尔基和塔尔洛的底物溶液相对不稳定不太可能导致错误结果;然而,斯堪的纳维亚配方具有试剂使用更经济的优点,代价是灵敏度略有降低,可能并不重要。