Suppr超能文献

论治疗严重破坏性行为时复发的范围和特征。

On the scope and characteristics of relapse when treating severe destructive behavior.

机构信息

Children's Specialized Hospital-Rutgers University Center for Autism Research, Education, and Services (CSH-RUCARES).

Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School.

出版信息

J Appl Behav Anal. 2022 Jun;55(3):688-703. doi: 10.1002/jaba.912. Epub 2022 Mar 15.

Abstract

Prior studies on treatment relapse have typically examined the prevalence of resurgence or renewal of target behavior (e.g., destructive behavior) in isolation. This study analyzed both types of relapse during 25 consecutive treatments involving functional communication training during worsening reinforcement conditions for alternative behavior (i.e., schedule thinning) or following context changes. We also examined disruption of alternative behavior (i.e., functional communication requests, compliance). Resurgence and renewal of destructive behavior occurred in 76% and 69% of treatments, respectively, and in approximately a third of changes in reinforcement or context. Relapse of destructive behavior predicted alternative-response disruption and vice versa; the co-occurrence of these two events always exceeded the background probabilities of either event occurring in isolation. General reductions in treatment efficacy occurred across changes in reinforcement or context, with no apparent decrease in likelihood in later transitions. We discuss implications of our findings with respect to future studies examining treatment durability.

摘要

先前关于治疗复发的研究通常单独检查目标行为(例如,破坏性行为)的重现或恢复的流行率。本研究在 25 次连续治疗中分析了这两种类型的复发,这些治疗涉及在替代行为(即时间表变薄)的强化条件恶化或在环境变化后进行功能沟通训练。我们还检查了替代行为(即功能沟通请求,依从性)的中断。破坏性行为的重现和恢复分别发生在 76%和 69%的治疗中,大约三分之一的强化或环境变化中。破坏性行为的复发预测了替代反应的中断,反之亦然;这两个事件的同时发生总是超过了这两个事件单独发生的背景概率。在强化或环境变化中,治疗效果普遍降低,后期过渡的可能性没有明显降低。我们根据我们的发现讨论了未来研究中关于治疗持久性的意义。

相似文献

3
Relapse during the treatment of pediatric feeding disorders.小儿喂养障碍治疗中的复发。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2022 Jun;55(3):704-726. doi: 10.1002/jaba.913. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
6
Renewal, resurgence, and alternative reinforcement context.更新、复苏与替代强化情境。
Behav Processes. 2015 Jul;116:43-9. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.04.015. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
8
Baseline reinforcement rate and resurgence of destructive behavior.基线强化率与破坏性行为的复燃。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2019 Jan;111(1):75-93. doi: 10.1002/jeab.488. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
9
Investigations of operant ABA renewal during differential reinforcement.差别强化期间操作性ABA恢复的研究。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2020 Jan;113(1):187-205. doi: 10.1002/jeab.577. Epub 2020 Jan 3.

引用本文的文献

2
A scoping review of consecutive controlled case series studies.连续对照病例系列研究的范围综述。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2025 Apr;58(2):270-286. doi: 10.1002/jaba.70006. Epub 2025 Apr 11.
3
Understanding and Reacting to Relapse: Considerations for Practitioners.理解复发并做出反应:从业者需考虑的因素
Behav Anal Pract. 2024 Oct 15;18(1):34-55. doi: 10.1007/s40617-024-00997-z. eCollection 2025 Mar.
4
The Need to Distinguish between "Lapse" and "Relapse".区分“失误”与“复发”的必要性。
Perspect Behav Sci. 2025 Feb 14;48(1):115-132. doi: 10.1007/s40614-025-00436-6. eCollection 2025 Mar.
9
Barriers to Accessing Effective Treatments for Destructive Behavior.获取针对破坏性行为的有效治疗方法的障碍。
Policy Insights Behav Brain Sci. 2023 Mar;10(1):68-74. doi: 10.1177/23727322221144653. Epub 2023 Mar 15.

本文引用的文献

7
Prevalence of renewal of problem behavior during context changes.在情境变化中问题行为复发的流行率。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2020 Jul;53(3):1485-1493. doi: 10.1002/jaba.672. Epub 2020 Jan 7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验