Krstulovic Giorgio, L'vov Victor, Nazarenko Sergey
Université Côte d'Azur, Observatoire de la Côte d'Azur, CNRS, Laboratoire Lagrange, Boulevard de l'Observatoire, CS 34229, F-06304 Nice Cedex 4, France.
Department of Chemical and Biological Physics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel.
Phys Rev E. 2022 Feb;105(2-2):027101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.105.027101.
In a recent paper, Tanogami [Phys. Rev. E 103, 023106 (2021)2470-004510.1103/PhysRevE.103.023106] proposes a scenario for quantum turbulence where the energy spectrum at scales smaller than the intervortex distance is dominated by a quantum stress cascade, in opposition to Kelvin-wave cascade predictions. The purpose of the present Comment is to highlight some physical issues in the derivation of the quantum stress cascade, in particular to stress that quantization of circulation has been ignored.
在最近的一篇论文中，田野上[《物理评论E》103, 023106 (2021)2470 - 004510.1103/PhysRevE.103.023106]提出了一种量子湍流的情景，其中在小于涡旋间距离的尺度上的能谱由量子应力级联主导，这与开尔文波级联预测相反。本评论的目的是突出量子应力级联推导中的一些物理问题，特别是强调环流的量子化被忽略了。
