Noppert Grace A, Stebbins Rebecca C, Dowd Jennifer Beam, Aiello Allison E
Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI USA.
Social, Genetic, & Developmental Psychiatry Centre; Institute for Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience; King's College London, London, UK.
medRxiv. 2022 Mar 7:2022.03.05.22271952. doi: 10.1101/2022.03.05.22271952.
The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the urgent need to understand variation in immunosenescence at the population-level. Thus far, population patterns of immunosenescence are not well described.
We characterized measures of immunosenescence from newly released venous blood data from the nationally representative U.S Health and Retirement Study (HRS) of individuals ages 56 years and older.
Median values of the CD8+:CD4+, EMRA:Nave CD4+ and EMRA:Nave CD8+ ratios were higher among older participants and were lower in those with additional educational attainment. Generally, minoritized race and ethnic groups had immune markers suggestive of a more aged immune profile: Hispanics had a CD8+:CD4+ median value of 0.37 (95% CI: 0.35, 0.39) compared to 0.30 in Whites (95% CI: 0.29, 0.31). Blacks had the highest median value of the EMRA:Nave CD4+ ratio (0.08; 95% CI: 0.07, 0.09) compared to Whites (0.03; 95% CI: 0.028, 0.033). In regression analyses, race/ethnicity and education were associated with large differences in the immune ratio measures after adjustment for age and sex. For example, each additional level of education was associated with roughly an additional decade of immunological age, and the racial/ethnic differences were associated with two to four decades of additional immunological age.
Our study provides novel insights into population variation in immunosenescence. This has implications for both risk of age-related disease and vulnerability to novel pathogens (e.g., SARS-CoV-2).
This study was partially funded by the U.S. National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Aging R00AG062749. AEA and GAN acknowledge support from the National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Aging R01AG075719. JBD acknowledges support from the Leverhulme Trust (Centre Grant) and the European Research Council grant ERC-2021-CoG-101002587.
Alterations in immunity with chronological aging have been consistently demonstrated across human populations. Some of the hallmark changes in adaptive immunity associated with aging, termed immunosenescence, include a decrease in nave T-cells, an increase in terminal effector memory cells, and an inverted CD8:CD4 T cell ratio. Several studies have shown that social and psychosocial exposures can alter aspects of immunity and lead to increased susceptibility to infectious diseases. While chronological age is known to impact immunosenescence, there are no studies examining whether social and demographic factors independently impact immunosenescence. This is important because immunosenescence has been associated with greater susceptibility to disease and lower immune response to vaccination. Identifying social and demographic variability in immunosenescence could help inform risk and surveillance efforts for preventing disease in older age. To our knowledge, we present one of the first large-scale population-based investigations of the social and demographic patterns of immunosenescence among individuals ages 50 and older living in the US. We found differences in the measures of immunosenescence by age, sex, race/ethnicity, and education, though the magnitude of these differences varied across immune measures and sociodemographic subgroup. Those occupying more disadvantaged societal positions (i.e., minoritized race and ethnic groups and individuals with lower educational attainment) experience greater levels of immunosenescence compared to those in less disadvantaged positions. Of note, the magnitude of effect of sociodemographic factors was larger than chronological age for many of the associations. The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the need to better understand variation in adaptive and innate immunity at the population-level. While chronological age has traditionally been thought of as the primary driver of immunological aging, the magnitude of differences we observed by sociodemographic factors suggests an important role for the social environment in the aging human immune system.
2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行凸显了在人群层面了解免疫衰老差异的迫切需求。迄今为止,免疫衰老的人群模式尚未得到充分描述。
我们从具有全国代表性的美国健康与退休研究(HRS)中56岁及以上个体新发布的静脉血数据中,对免疫衰老指标进行了特征描述。
在年龄较大的参与者中,CD8⁺:CD4⁺、终末记忆效应细胞(EMRA):初始CD4⁺和EMRA:初始CD8⁺比值的中位数较高,而在受教育程度较高的人群中则较低。一般来说,少数族裔和种族群体的免疫标志物提示其免疫状态更接近衰老状态:西班牙裔的CD8⁺:CD4⁺中位数为0.37(95%置信区间:0.35,0.39),而白人的该比值为0.30(95%置信区间:0.29,0.31)。黑人的EMRA:初始CD4⁺比值中位数最高(0.08;95%置信区间:0.07,0.09),而白人的该比值为0.03(95%置信区间:0.028,0.033)。在回归分析中,在对年龄和性别进行调整后,种族/族裔和教育程度与免疫比值指标的巨大差异相关。例如,每增加一个教育水平大约与增加十年的免疫年龄相关,而种族/族裔差异与增加两到四个十年的免疫年龄相关。
我们的研究为免疫衰老的人群差异提供了新的见解。这对与年龄相关疾病的风险以及对新型病原体(如严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2[SARS-CoV-2])的易感性都有影响。
本研究部分由美国国立卫生研究院、国立衰老研究所R00AG062749资助。AEA和GAN感谢国立卫生研究院、国立衰老研究所R01AG075719的支持。JBD感谢利华休姆信托基金(中心资助)和欧洲研究理事会资助ERC-2021-CoG-101002587。
在整个人类群体中,免疫功能随年龄增长而发生的变化已得到一致证实。与衰老相关的适应性免疫的一些标志性变化,即免疫衰老,包括初始T细胞减少、终末效应记忆细胞增加以及CD8:CD4 T细胞比值倒置。多项研究表明,社会和心理社会暴露可改变免疫功能的某些方面,并导致对传染病的易感性增加。虽然已知年龄会影响免疫衰老,但尚无研究考察社会和人口因素是否独立影响免疫衰老。这一点很重要,因为免疫衰老与更高的疾病易感性以及对疫苗接种的较低免疫反应相关。确定免疫衰老中的社会和人口差异有助于为预防老年人疾病的风险和监测工作提供信息。据我们所知,我们开展了首批针对美国50岁及以上人群免疫衰老的社会和人口模式的大规模基于人群的调查之一。我们发现,免疫衰老指标在年龄、性别、种族/族裔和教育程度方面存在差异,尽管这些差异的程度在不同免疫指标和社会人口亚组中有所不同。与处于较不利地位的人群相比,那些处于更不利社会地位的人群(即少数族裔和种族群体以及受教育程度较低的个体)经历的免疫衰老水平更高。值得注意的是,对于许多关联而言,社会人口因素的影响程度大于年龄。COVID-19大流行凸显了更好地了解人群层面适应性免疫和固有免疫差异的必要性。虽然传统上认为年龄是免疫衰老的主要驱动因素,但我们观察到的社会人口因素差异程度表明社会环境在人类免疫系统衰老中起重要作用。