Wu Taoguang, Chen Hua, Nie Shaobo, Zhang Wei, Wang Ya, Tang Peifu
Senior Department of Orthopedics, the Fourth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100048, P. R. China.
Department of Orthopedics, Guannan County People's Hospital, Guannan Jiangsu, 222500, P. R. China.
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Mar 15;36(3):279-283. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202111086.
To explore the value of wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) technique in the treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture.
In a prospective randomized controlled trial, 48 patients with acute Achilles tendon rupture who met the criteria between March 2020 and October 2020 were randomly divided into two groups according to 1∶1 distribution, with 24 cases in each group. The study group used WALANT technique and the control group used epidural anesthesia with tourniquet for channel-assisted minimally invasive repair (CAMIR). There was no significant difference between the two groups in gender, age, injured side, cause of injury, distance from broken end of Achilles tendon to calcaneal tubercle, and time from injury to hospitalization ( >0.05). The operating room use time (from patients entering the operating room to leaving the operating room), intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, and the highest pain score [using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)] during operation and at 1 day after operation were recorded and compared between the two groups. The tourniquet adverse reactions in the control group were recorded. The functional recovery was evaluated by the scoring method of American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) at 12 months after operation.
The operation was successfully completed in both groups. The operating room use time and hospital stay in the study group were significantly less than those in the control group ( <0.05), but the difference in the intraoperative blood loss between the two groups was not significant ( =0.429, =0.670). There was no significant difference in the highest NRS score during operation between the two groups ( =1.671, =0.101); the highest NRS score in the study group at 1 day after operation was significantly lower than that in the control group ( =-6.384, <0.001). In the control group, 13 patients had different degrees of tourniquet adverse reactions, including tourniquet regional pain, local swelling, blisters, thigh numbness, and discomfort. The patients in both groups were followed up 12-18 months, with an average of 13.9 months. The motor function of all patients returned to normal at 12 months after operation. The difference in AOFAS scores between the two groups was not significant ( =0.345, =0.731). There was no complication such as sural nerve injury, local infection, and secondary rupture in both groups.
The application of WALANT combined with CAMIR technique in the treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture has good anesthetic and effectiveness, avoids the adverse reactions of tourniquet, and reasonably saves social medical resources.
探讨清醒局部麻醉无止血带(WALANT)技术在急性跟腱断裂治疗中的应用价值。
在一项前瞻性随机对照试验中,选取2020年3月至2020年10月期间符合标准的48例急性跟腱断裂患者,按1∶1比例随机分为两组,每组24例。研究组采用WALANT技术,对照组采用硬膜外麻醉加止血带行通道辅助微创修复(CAMIR)。两组患者在性别、年龄、患侧、受伤原因、跟腱断端至跟骨结节距离、受伤至入院时间等方面比较,差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。记录并比较两组患者的手术室使用时间(从患者进入手术室至离开手术室)、术中出血量、住院时间以及手术中及术后1天的最高疼痛评分[采用数字评分法(NRS)]。记录对照组止血带不良反应情况。术后12个月采用美国矫形足踝协会(AOFAS)评分法评估功能恢复情况。
两组手术均顺利完成。研究组手术室使用时间和住院时间均显著短于对照组(<0.05),但两组术中出血量差异无统计学意义(=0.429,=0.670)。两组手术中最高NRS评分差异无统计学意义(=1.671,=0.101);研究组术后1天最高NRS评分显著低于对照组(=-6.384,<0.001)。对照组有13例患者出现不同程度的止血带不良反应,包括止血带区域疼痛、局部肿胀、水疱、大腿麻木及不适。两组患者均随访12 - 18个月,平均13.9个月。所有患者术后12个月运动功能均恢复正常。两组AOFAS评分差异无统计学意义(=0.345,=0.731)。两组均未出现腓肠神经损伤、局部感染及二次断裂等并发症。
WALANT联合CAMIR技术应用于急性跟腱断裂治疗,具有良好的麻醉效果和有效性,避免止血带不良反应,合理节约社会医疗资源。