Suppr超能文献

坐立动作重复次数对压力反射敏感性和心血管风险评估的影响。

Effects of the number of sit-stand maneuver repetitions on baroreflex sensitivity and cardiovascular risk assessments.

作者信息

Mori Shoya, Tarumi Takashi, Kosaki Keisei, Matsui Masahiro, Yoshioka Masaki, Sugawara Jun, Kuro-O Makoto, Saito Chie, Yamagata Kunihiro, Maeda Seiji

机构信息

Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2022 May 1;322(5):R400-R410. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00141.2021. Epub 2022 Mar 16.

Abstract

Sit-stand maneuvers (SSMs) have increasingly been used for baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) measurement in physiological research, but it remains unknown as to how many SSMs need to be performed to measure BRS and assess its relationship with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Therefore, this study aimed to determine ) the effect of the number of SSM repetitions on BRS, and ) the association between BRS and CVD risk factors. Data were collected from 174 individuals during 5 min of spontaneous rest and 5 min of repeated SSMs at 0.05 Hz (i.e., 15 cycles of 10-s sit and 10-s stand). During SSMs, BRS was calculated from the incremental cycles of 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 SSMs using transfer function analysis of heart rate (HR) and systolic blood pressure (SBP). General CVD risk factors, carotid arterial stiffness, and cardiorespiratory fitness were measured. In result, HR and SBP increased during SSMs ( < 0.05). The BRS remained at a similar level during the resting and SSM conditions, whereas the coherence function reached its peak after 3 cycles of SSMs. BRS with ≥6 cycles of SSMs was strongly correlated with age ( = -0.721 to -0.740), carotid distensibility ( = 0.625-0.629), and cardiorespiratory fitness ( = 0.333-0.351) (all < 0.001). Multiple regression analysis demonstrated that BRS with ≥6 cycles of SSMs explained >60% of the variance in CVD risk factors. Therefore, our findings suggest that repeated SSMs significantly strengthens the association between BRS and CVD risk factors. Particularly, BRS with ≥6 cycles of SSMs is strongly associated with CVD risk.

摘要

坐立试验(SSMs)在生理学研究中越来越多地用于压力反射敏感性(BRS)测量,但尚不清楚需要进行多少次坐立试验才能测量BRS并评估其与心血管疾病(CVD)风险的关系。因此,本研究旨在确定:1)坐立试验重复次数对BRS的影响;2)BRS与CVD风险因素之间的关联。在174名个体自发休息5分钟和以0.05Hz重复进行坐立试验5分钟(即15个周期,每个周期10秒坐立和10秒站立)期间收集数据。在坐立试验期间,使用心率(HR)和收缩压(SBP)的传递函数分析,从3、6、9、12和15次坐立试验的增量周期计算BRS。测量一般CVD风险因素、颈动脉僵硬度和心肺适应性。结果显示,坐立试验期间HR和SBP升高(P<0.05)。在休息和坐立试验条件下,BRS保持在相似水平,而相干函数在坐立试验3个周期后达到峰值。≥6次坐立试验的BRS与年龄(r=-0.721至-0.740)、颈动脉扩张性(r=0.625-0.629)和心肺适应性(r=0.333-0.351)密切相关(均P<0.001)。多元回归分析表明,≥6次坐立试验的BRS解释了CVD风险因素中>60%的方差。因此,我们的研究结果表明,重复坐立试验显著加强了BRS与CVD风险因素之间的关联。特别是,≥6次坐立试验的BRS与CVD风险密切相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验