School of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
J Integr Complement Med. 2022 Mar;28(3):202-217. doi: 10.1089/jicm.2021.0128. Epub 2022 Jan 17.
This systematic review aimed to document and describe how and when to assess patients' expectancies to acupuncture and the relationship between patients' expectancies and clinical effects. Three English databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and EMBASE, and four Chinese databases, including the Chinese Biomedicine Literature Database, Chinese Journal Full-text Database, Chinese Scientific Journal Full-text Database, and Wanfang Database, were searched up to February 2020. Studies involving patients' expectancies to acupuncture were included. Based on the detailed situations of patients' expectancies, we made a standardized data extraction table that included the basic information of articles, study design details, and measurement of expectations. Based on the data, a descriptive analysis was performed, covering the characteristics of studies, measuring methods of expectations and the relationship between patients' expectancies and clinical effects. Methodology quality assessment was also performed by the risk of bias and the standards for reporting interventions in controlled trials of acupuncture. There were 61 randomized controlled trials included in our analysis. The number of articles increased gradually over time and grew significantly after 2008. About half of trials focused on pain alleviation. Expectancies were measured before the treatment ( = 43), after the treatment ( = 3), and both before and after the treatment ( = 10), and five studies did not mention it. The measurement of expectancies used self-made questionnaires or scales ( = 27), the Acupuncture Expectations Scale ( = 6), and other scales ( = 11), while 17 studies did not describe what scale they used. The used questionnaires or scales mostly tried to ascertain the strength of confidence that acupuncture would help. Patients' expectancies and clinical effects were relevant in 19 studies, irrelevant in 21 studies, and were not mentioned in 21 studies. Patients' expectations to acupuncture have received increasing attention in recent years, but there is still no recognized measurement time and methods. It is critical to develop questions and answers regarding patients' expectations with better discrimination and reliability to accurately assess expectations and to explore the relationship between patients' expectations and acupuncture outcomes in future trials.
这篇系统评价旨在记录和描述如何以及何时评估患者对针灸的期望,以及患者期望与临床效果之间的关系。我们检索了 3 个英文数据库(包括 PubMed、Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库和 EMBASE)和 4 个中文数据库(包括中国生物医学文献数据库、中国期刊全文数据库、中国科技期刊全文数据库和万方数据库),检索截至 2020 年 2 月。纳入涉及患者对针灸期望的研究。根据患者期望的详细情况,我们制作了一个标准化的数据提取表,其中包括文章的基本信息、研究设计细节和期望的测量。根据数据进行描述性分析,涵盖研究特征、期望的测量方法以及患者期望与临床效果之间的关系。还通过偏倚风险和针灸对照试验报告标准对方法学质量进行了评估。 我们的分析共纳入 61 项随机对照试验。随着时间的推移,文章数量逐渐增加,2008 年后显著增加。约一半的试验侧重于缓解疼痛。期望的测量时间在治疗前( = 43)、治疗后( = 3)和治疗前后( = 10),5 项研究未提及。期望的测量使用了自制问卷或量表( = 27)、针灸期望量表( = 6)和其他量表( = 11),而 17 项研究未描述使用的量表。使用的问卷或量表大多试图确定对针灸有帮助的信心强度。在 19 项研究中,患者的期望与临床效果相关,在 21 项研究中不相关,在 21 项研究中未提及。 近年来,患者对针灸的期望受到了越来越多的关注,但仍没有公认的测量时间和方法。未来的试验中,开发具有更好区分度和可靠性的关于患者期望的问题和答案,以准确评估期望,并探索患者期望与针灸结果之间的关系至关重要。