Department of Cardiology, Tokai University, Shimokasuya 143, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2022 Jun;64(1):217-222. doi: 10.1007/s10840-022-01182-4. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
The feasibility and safety of cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation with contiguous lesions using ablation index (AI) under the guidance of fluoroscopy integrated 3D mapping (CARTO UNIVU/CU) in typical atrial flutter (AFL) remains uncertain. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of AI-guided CTI ablation with contiguous lesions in patients with AFL.
In this single-center, prospective, non-randomized, single-arm, observational study, procedural outcomes were determined in 151 patients undergoing AI-guided CTI ablation (AI group) with a target AI value of 450 and an interlesion distance of ≤ 4 mm under CU guidance. These outcomes were compared with those of 30 patients undergoing non-AI-guided ablation (non-AI group).
Among 151 patients, first-pass conduction block was achieved in 120 (80%) patients in the AI group (67% in the non-AI group, P = 0.152) with a shorter fluoroscopy time of 0.2 ± 0.4 min (1.7 ± 2.0 min in the non-AI group, P < 0.001). Conduction gaps were located at the atrial aspects near the inferior vena cava in 24 of 31 (78%) patients without first-pass conduction block. The AI group received 11 ± 5 (12 ± 4 in the non-AI group, P = 0.098) radiofrequency (RF) applications, and the RF time was 4.2 ± 2.4 (5.1 ± 2.5 min in the non-AI group, P = 0.011). Despite the occurrence of steam pop in 3 (2%) patients, none of them developed cardiac tamponade. No patients had recurrence within 6 months of follow-up.
AI-guided CTI ablation in combination with CU was feasible and effective in reducing radiation exposure in patients with AFL.
在 CARTO UNIVU/CU 引导下,使用连续消融灶和消融指数(AI)指导下进行心耳峡部(CTI)消融的可行性和安全性在典型心房扑动(AFL)中仍不确定。本研究旨在确定 AFL 患者中使用 AI 指导 CTI 消融联合连续消融灶的疗效。
在这项单中心、前瞻性、非随机、单臂、观察性研究中,在 151 例接受 AI 指导 CTI 消融(AI 组)的患者中确定了程序结果,消融指数目标值为 450,在 CU 引导下,消融灶之间的距离≤4mm。这些结果与 30 例接受非 AI 指导消融的患者(非 AI 组)进行了比较。
在 151 例患者中,AI 组 120 例(80%)患者实现了首次通过传导阻滞(非 AI 组为 67%,P=0.152),透视时间更短,为 0.2±0.4 分钟(非 AI 组为 1.7±2.0 分钟,P<0.001)。在 31 例首次通过传导阻滞失败的患者中,有 24 例(78%)患者的传导间隙位于下腔静脉附近的心房面。AI 组接受 11±5(非 AI 组为 12±4,P=0.098)次射频(RF)应用,RF 时间为 4.2±2.4(非 AI 组为 5.1±2.5 分钟,P=0.011)。尽管有 3 例(2%)患者发生蒸汽爆,但均未发生心脏压塞。无患者在 6 个月随访内复发。
在 AFL 患者中,使用 AI 指导 CTI 消融联合 CU 是可行且有效的,可以减少辐射暴露。