• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生存数据分析中的个体预测效果。

The Predictive Individual Effect for Survival Data.

机构信息

Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.

Pfizer Inc, New York, NY, 235 E 42nd St, 10017, USA.

出版信息

Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2022 May;56(3):492-500. doi: 10.1007/s43441-022-00386-0. Epub 2022 Mar 16.

DOI:10.1007/s43441-022-00386-0
PMID:35294767
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The call for patient-focused drug development is loud and clear, as expressed in the twenty-first Century Cures Act and in recent guidelines and initiatives of regulatory agencies. Among the factors contributing to modernized drug development and improved health-care activities are easily interpretable measures of clinical benefit. In addition, special care is needed for cancer trials with time-to-event endpoints if the treatment effect is not constant over time.

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the potential clinical survival benefit for a new patient, would he/she be treated with the test or control treatment.

METHODS

We propose the predictive individual effect which is a patient-centric and tangible measure of clinical benefit under a wide variety of scenarios. It can be obtained by standard predictive calculations under a rank preservation assumption that has been used previously in trials with treatment switching.

RESULTS

We discuss four recent Oncology trials that cover situations with proportional as well as non-proportional hazards (delayed treatment effect or crossing of survival curves). It is shown that the predictive individual effect offers valuable insights beyond p-values, estimates of hazard ratios or differences in median survival.

CONCLUSION

Compared to standard statistical measures, the predictive individual effect is a direct, easily interpretable measure of clinical benefit. It facilitates communication among clinicians, patients, and other parties and should therefore be considered in addition to standard statistical results.

摘要

背景

正如二十一世纪治愈法案以及最近监管机构的准则和倡议所表达的那样,人们强烈呼吁以患者为中心的药物开发。有助于实现药物开发现代化和改善医疗保健活动的因素包括临床获益的易于解释的衡量标准。此外,如果治疗效果随时间而不是恒定的,那么对于具有时间事件终点的癌症试验,需要特别注意。

目的

如果新患者接受测试或对照治疗,量化其潜在的临床生存获益。

方法

我们提出了预测个体效应,这是一种以患者为中心且有形的临床获益衡量标准,可以在广泛的情况下获得。它可以通过在治疗转换试验中先前使用的排名保留假设下进行标准预测计算来获得。

结果

我们讨论了最近四项肿瘤学试验,涵盖了比例和非比例风险(延迟治疗效果或生存曲线交叉)的情况。结果表明,预测个体效应提供了超出 p 值、风险比估计或中位生存差异的有价值的见解。

结论

与标准统计措施相比,预测个体效应是临床获益的直接、易于解释的衡量标准。它促进了临床医生、患者和其他各方之间的沟通,因此应考虑将其纳入标准统计结果之外。

相似文献

1
The Predictive Individual Effect for Survival Data.生存数据分析中的个体预测效果。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2022 May;56(3):492-500. doi: 10.1007/s43441-022-00386-0. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
2
The Net Chance of a Longer Survival as a Patient-Oriented Measure of Treatment Benefit in Randomized Clinical Trials.作为随机临床试验中治疗效益的一种以患者为中心的衡量指标,净生存机会。
JAMA Oncol. 2016 Jul 1;2(7):901-5. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.6359.
3
Which test for crossing survival curves? A user's guideline.哪种检验方法适用于比较生存曲线?使用指南。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Jan 30;22(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01520-0.
4
Comparison of the restricted mean survival time with the hazard ratio in superiority trials with a time-to-event end point.在具有事件发生时间终点的优效性试验中,受限平均生存时间与风险比的比较。
Pharm Stat. 2018 May;17(3):202-213. doi: 10.1002/pst.1846. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
5
Empirical power comparison of statistical tests in contemporary phase III randomized controlled trials with time-to-event outcomes in oncology.肿瘤学中以时间为事件的当代 III 期随机对照试验中统计检验的经验功效比较。
Clin Trials. 2020 Dec;17(6):597-606. doi: 10.1177/1740774520940256. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
6
The Average Hazard Ratio - A Good Effect Measure for Time-to-event Endpoints when the Proportional Hazard Assumption is Violated?平均风险比——当比例风险假设不成立时,用于事件发生时间终点的良好效应量度?
Methods Inf Med. 2018 May;57(3):89-100. doi: 10.3414/ME17-01-0058. Epub 2018 May 2.
7
Are non-constant rates and non-proportional treatment effects accounted for in the design and analysis of randomised controlled trials? A review of current practice.随机对照试验的设计和分析中是否考虑了非恒定率和非比例治疗效果?对当前实践的回顾。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 May 16;19(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0749-1.
8
Measuring Survival Benefit in Health Technology Assessment in the Presence of Nonproportional Hazards.存在非比例风险时健康技术评估中的生存获益测量。
Value Health. 2019 Apr;22(4):431-438. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.01.005. Epub 2019 Mar 23.
9
Critical review of oncology clinical trial design under non-proportional hazards.非比例风险下肿瘤临床试验设计的批判性评价。
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2021 Jun;162:103350. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103350. Epub 2021 May 12.
10
Nonparametric analysis of delayed treatment effects using single-crossing constraints.基于单交叉约束的延迟治疗效果的非参数分析。
Biom J. 2024 Mar;66(2):e2200165. doi: 10.1002/bimj.202200165.

引用本文的文献

1
The Current Situation and Innovation of News Communication under the Environment of Financial Media.金融媒体环境下新闻传播的现状与创新。
J Environ Public Health. 2022 Jun 18;2022:3440217. doi: 10.1155/2022/3440217. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Prediction meets causal inference: the role of treatment in clinical prediction models.预测与因果推断:治疗在临床预测模型中的作用。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2020 Jul;35(7):619-630. doi: 10.1007/s10654-020-00636-1. Epub 2020 May 22.
2
Methods for Accommodating Nonproportional Hazards in Clinical Trials: Ready for the Primary Analysis?临床试验中处理非比例风险的方法:准备好进行初步分析了吗?
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Dec 10;37(35):3455-3459. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.01681. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
3
The Use of "Trend" Statements to Describe Statistically Nonsignificant Results in the Oncology Literature.
在肿瘤学文献中使用“趋势”语句来描述统计学上无显著意义的结果。
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Dec 1;4(12):1778-1779. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.4524.
4
Statistical literacy for healthcare professionals: Why is it important?医疗保健专业人员的统计素养:为何重要?
Ann Card Anaesth. 2018 Oct-Dec;21(4):349-350. doi: 10.4103/aca.ACA_177_18.
5
Beyond p-values: A phase II dual-criterion design with statistical significance and clinical relevance.超越 P 值:具有统计学意义和临床相关性的 II 期双重标准设计。
Clin Trials. 2018 Oct;15(5):452-461. doi: 10.1177/1740774518770661.
6
Improvement in Overall Survival With Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma.卡非佐米、来那度胺和地塞米松治疗复发或难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者的总生存期改善。
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Mar 10;36(8):728-734. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.76.5032. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
7
Atezolizumab versus chemotherapy in patients with platinum-treated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (IMvigor211): a multicentre, open-label, phase 3 randomised controlled trial.阿特珠单抗与化疗用于铂类治疗后局部晚期或转移性尿路上皮癌患者(IMvigor211):一项多中心、开放标签、III 期随机对照临床试验。
Lancet. 2018 Feb 24;391(10122):748-757. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33297-X. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
8
Nivolumab for Recurrent Squamous-Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck.纳武利尤单抗用于复发性头颈部鳞状细胞癌
N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 10;375(19):1856-1867. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1602252. Epub 2016 Oct 8.
9
Pragmatic clinical trials: Emerging challenges and new roles for statisticians.实用临床试验:统计学家面临的新挑战与新角色
Clin Trials. 2016 Oct;13(5):471-7. doi: 10.1177/1740774516656944. Epub 2016 Jul 3.
10
Atezolizumab versus docetaxel for patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (POPLAR): a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 randomised controlled trial.阿特珠单抗对比多西他赛用于治疗既往接受过治疗的非小细胞肺癌患者(POPLAR):一项多中心、开放标签、2 期随机对照临床试验。
Lancet. 2016 Apr 30;387(10030):1837-46. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00587-0. Epub 2016 Mar 10.