Suppr超能文献

美国医疗保险受益人群中新诊断癫痫的抗癫痫药物治疗途径。

Antiseizure medication treatment pathways for US Medicare beneficiaries with newly treated epilepsy.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Department of Neurosurgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

Epilepsia. 2022 Jun;63(6):1571-1579. doi: 10.1111/epi.17226. Epub 2022 Mar 25.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to characterize antiseizure medication (ASM) treatment pathways in Medicare beneficiaries with newly treated epilepsy.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study using Medicare claims. Medicare is the United States' federal health insurance program for people aged 65 years and older plus younger people with disabilities or end-stage renal disease. We included beneficiaries with newly treated epilepsy (International Classification of Diseases codes for epilepsy/convulsions 2014-2017, no ASM in the previous 2 years). We displayed the sequence of ASM fills using sunburst plots overall, then stratified by mood disorder, age, and neurologist prescriber. We tabulated drug costs for each pathway.

RESULTS

We included 21 458 beneficiaries. Levetiracetam comprised the greatest number of pill days (56%), followed by gabapentin (11%) and valproate (8%). There were 22 288 unique treatment pathways. The most common pathways were levetiracetam monotherapy (43%), gabapentin monotherapy (10%), and valproate monotherapy (5%). Gabapentin was the most common second- and third-line ASM. Whereas only 2% of pathways involved first-line lacosamide, those pathways accounted for 19% of cost. Gabapentin and valproate use was increased and levetiracetam use was decreased in beneficiaries with mood disorders compared to beneficiaries without mood disorders. Levetiracetam use was increased and gabapentin, valproate, lamotrigine, and topiramate use was decreased in beneficiaries aged >65 years compared with those aged 65 years or less. Lamotrigine, levetiracetam, and lacosamide use was increased and gabapentin use was decreased in beneficiaries whose initial prescriber was a neurologist compared to those whose prescriber was not a neurologist.

SIGNIFICANCE

Levetiracetam monotherapy was the most common pathway, although substantial heterogeneity existed. Lacosamide accounted for a small percentage of ASMs but a disproportionately large share of cost. Neurologists were more likely to prescribe lamotrigine compared with nonneurologists, and lamotrigine was prescribed far less frequently than may be endorsed by guidelines. Future work may explore patient- and physician-driven factors underlying ASM choices.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在描述医疗保险受益人群中新诊断癫痫患者的抗癫痫药物(ASM)治疗途径。

方法

这是一项使用医疗保险索赔数据的回顾性队列研究。医疗保险是美国针对 65 岁及以上人群以及患有残疾或终末期肾病的年轻人的联邦健康保险计划。我们纳入了新诊断为癫痫的受益人群(2014-2017 年癫痫/抽搐国际疾病分类代码,前 2 年无 ASM)。我们使用太阳辐射图整体显示 ASM 填充的顺序,然后按心境障碍、年龄和神经科医生处方者进行分层。我们为每个途径计算药物成本。

结果

我们纳入了 21458 名受益人群。左乙拉西坦的药丸天数最多(56%),其次是加巴喷丁(11%)和丙戊酸钠(8%)。共有 22288 种独特的治疗途径。最常见的途径是左乙拉西坦单药治疗(43%)、加巴喷丁单药治疗(10%)和丙戊酸钠单药治疗(5%)。加巴喷丁是最常见的二线和三线 ASM。尽管一线拉科酰胺的途径仅占 2%,但这些途径占成本的 19%。与无心境障碍的受益人群相比,有心境障碍的受益人群中使用加巴喷丁和丙戊酸钠的比例增加,使用左乙拉西坦的比例减少。与 65 岁以下的受益人群相比,65 岁或以上的受益人群中使用左乙拉西坦、加巴喷丁、丙戊酸钠、拉莫三嗪和托吡酯的比例增加,使用加巴喷丁的比例减少。与非神经科医生相比,神经科医生更有可能开左乙拉西坦,而不是开加巴喷丁,而开左乙拉西坦的频率远低于指南所推荐的频率。未来的研究可能会探索 ASM 选择背后的患者和医生驱动因素。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验