Kavanagh Joanne E, Hearn Andrew P, Jackson David J
King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, UK.
Asthma UK Centre, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Breathe (Sheff). 2021 Dec;17(4):210144. doi: 10.1183/20734735.0144-2021.
There are now several monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapies ("biologics") available to treat severe asthma. Omalizumab is an anti-IgE mAb and is licensed in severe allergic asthma. Current evidence suggests it may decrease exacerbations by augmenting deficient antiviral immune responses in asthma. Like all other biologics, clinical efficacy is greatest in those with elevated T2 biomarkers. Three biologics target the interleukin (IL)-5-eosinophil pathway, including mepolizumab and reslizumab that target IL-5 itself, and benralizumab that targets the IL-5 receptor (IL-5R-α). These drugs all reduce the exacerbation rate in those with raised blood eosinophil counts. Mepolizumab and benralizumab have also demonstrated steroid-sparing efficacy. Reslizumab is the only biologic that is given intravenously rather than by the subcutaneous route. Dupilumab targets the IL-4 receptor and like mepolizumab and benralizumab is effective at reducing exacerbation rate as well as oral corticosteroid requirements. It is also effective for the treatment of nasal polyposis and atopic dermatitis. Tezepelumab is an anti-TSLP (thymic stromal lymphopoietin) mAb that has recently completed phase 3 trials demonstrating significant reductions in exacerbation rate even at lower T2 biomarker thresholds. Many patients with severe asthma qualify for more than one biologic. To date, there are no head-to-head trials to aid physicians in this choice. However, analyses have identified certain clinical characteristics that are associated with superior responses to some therapies. The presence of allergic and/or eosinophilic comorbidities, such as atopic dermatitis, nasal polyposis or eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, that may additionally benefit by the choice of biologic should also be taken into consideration, as should patient preferences which may include dosing frequency. To date, all biologics have been shown to have excellent safety profiles.
目前有几种单克隆抗体(mAb)疗法(“生物制剂”)可用于治疗重度哮喘。奥马珠单抗是一种抗IgE单克隆抗体,已获许可用于重度过敏性哮喘。目前的证据表明,它可能通过增强哮喘中不足的抗病毒免疫反应来减少病情加重。与所有其他生物制剂一样,临床疗效在T2生物标志物升高的患者中最为显著。三种生物制剂靶向白细胞介素(IL)-5-嗜酸性粒细胞途径,包括靶向IL-5本身的美泊利单抗和瑞利珠单抗,以及靶向IL-5受体(IL-5R-α)的贝那利珠单抗。这些药物都能降低血液嗜酸性粒细胞计数升高患者的病情加重率。美泊利单抗和贝那利珠单抗也已证明具有节省类固醇的功效。瑞利珠单抗是唯一一种通过静脉注射而非皮下注射给药的生物制剂。度普利尤单抗靶向IL-4受体,与美泊利单抗和贝那利珠单抗一样,在降低病情加重率以及口服皮质类固醇需求方面有效。它对鼻息肉病和特应性皮炎的治疗也有效。tezepelumab是一种抗胸腺基质淋巴细胞生成素(TSLP)单克隆抗体,最近已完成3期试验,结果表明即使在较低的T2生物标志物阈值下,病情加重率也显著降低。许多重度哮喘患者符合使用不止一种生物制剂的条件。迄今为止,尚无直接比较的试验来帮助医生做出这种选择。然而,分析已经确定了某些与对某些疗法的更好反应相关的临床特征。还应考虑是否存在过敏性和/或嗜酸性粒细胞合并症,如特应性皮炎、鼻息肉病或嗜酸性肉芽肿性多血管炎,选择生物制剂可能会使其额外受益,患者的偏好也应考虑在内,这可能包括给药频率。迄今为止,所有生物制剂都已显示出优异的安全性。