Suppr超能文献

光学相干断层扫描血管造影在视盘新生血管检测和评估中的应用:一项回顾性观察研究。

Optical coherence tomography angiography for the detection and evaluation of ptic disc neovascularization: a retrospective, observational study.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, 600 Yishan Road, Shanghai, 200233, China.

Shanghai Key Laboratory of Diabetes Mellitus, Shanghai, 200233, China.

出版信息

BMC Ophthalmol. 2022 Mar 16;22(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12886-022-02351-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To assess and characterize neovascularization of the optic disc (NVD) using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) and different OCTA-based methods.

METHODS

This retrospective, observational study included patients who were suspected of having early PDR with no presence of clinically apparent neovascularization (NV) bur were clinically diagnosed with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), or severe NPDR. Patients underwent standard clinical examinations and OCTA imaging using a 6 × 6 montage scan. Two trained graders identified NVD using different imaging systems (ultra-widefield-colour fundus photography (UWF-CFP), OCT, OCTA and fluorescein angiography (FA)). Moreover, morphological classification of NVD was performed. The detection and morphological classification of NVD by different OCTA-based methods (B-scan OCTA, En-face OCTA, VRI Angio and VRI Structure) were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 169 eyes (126 eyes with PDR and 43 eyes with severe NPDR) of 123 participants were included in this study. The detection rate of NVD was 34.91% by UWF-CFP compared with 59.76% by OCT, 59.76% by OCTA, and 62.72% by FA. After excluding 2 cases with epiretinal membranes, the NVD diagnosis detected by OCT was used as the standard. Among 99 eyes diagnosed with NVD by OCT, B-scan OCTA detected NVD with a sensitivity of 97.98%, which was higher than that by en face OCTA (80.81%), VRI Angio (65.66%), and VRI Structure (61.62%) (all P < 0.05). According to its characteristics on OCTA, NVD was divided into four types (12 cases of type I, 6 cases of type II, 39 cases of type III, and 42 cases of type IV). For type I, B-scan OCTA exhibited a higher diagnostic sensitivity than other methods (P < 0.05). For types II and IV, there were no statistically significant differences in the sensitivity of various methods between the two groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

OCTA and different OCTA-based methods are significant to the diagnosis of NVD, and the diagnostic accuracy of different detection methods may be related to different types of NVD.

摘要

背景

使用光相干断层扫描血管造影术(OCTA)和不同的基于 OCTA 的方法评估和描述视盘新生血管(NVD)。

方法

这是一项回顾性观察研究,纳入了疑似早期 PDR 但无临床明显新生血管(NV)的患者,但临床诊断为增生性糖尿病视网膜病变(PDR)或严重非增生性糖尿病视网膜病变(NPDR)。患者接受标准临床检查和使用 6×6 montage 扫描的 OCTA 成像。两名经过培训的分级员使用不同的成像系统(超广角彩色眼底照相术(UWF-CFP)、OCT、OCTA 和荧光素血管造影术(FA))识别 NVD。此外,还进行了 NVD 的形态学分类。比较了不同基于 OCTA 的方法(B 扫描 OCTA、En-face OCTA、VRI Angio 和 VRI Structure)对 NVD 的检测和形态学分类。

结果

这项研究共纳入了 123 名参与者的 169 只眼(126 只眼患有 PDR,43 只眼患有严重 NPDR)。与 OCT 相比,UWF-CFP 检测 NVD 的检出率为 34.91%,OCT 为 59.76%,OCTA 为 59.76%,FA 为 62.72%。排除 2 例视网膜前膜后,OCT 诊断的 NVD 作为标准。在 99 只经 OCT 诊断为 NVD 的眼中,B 扫描 OCTA 的灵敏度为 97.98%,高于 En-face OCTA(80.81%)、VRI Angio(65.66%)和 VRI Structure(61.62%)(均 P<0.05)。根据 OCTA 的特征,NVD 分为 4 型(12 型 I 型、6 型 II 型、39 型 III 型和 42 型 IV 型)。对于 I 型,B 扫描 OCTA 的诊断灵敏度高于其他方法(P<0.05)。对于 II 型和 IV 型,两种方法之间的敏感性无统计学差异(P>0.05)。

结论

OCTA 和不同的基于 OCTA 的方法对 NVD 的诊断有重要意义,不同检测方法的诊断准确性可能与 NVD 的不同类型有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdb1/8928692/ec86ac8721e2/12886_2022_2351_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验