Department of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, 600 Yishan Road, Shanghai, 200233, China.
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Diabetes Mellitus, Shanghai, 200233, China.
BMC Ophthalmol. 2022 Mar 16;22(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12886-022-02351-9.
To assess and characterize neovascularization of the optic disc (NVD) using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) and different OCTA-based methods.
This retrospective, observational study included patients who were suspected of having early PDR with no presence of clinically apparent neovascularization (NV) bur were clinically diagnosed with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), or severe NPDR. Patients underwent standard clinical examinations and OCTA imaging using a 6 × 6 montage scan. Two trained graders identified NVD using different imaging systems (ultra-widefield-colour fundus photography (UWF-CFP), OCT, OCTA and fluorescein angiography (FA)). Moreover, morphological classification of NVD was performed. The detection and morphological classification of NVD by different OCTA-based methods (B-scan OCTA, En-face OCTA, VRI Angio and VRI Structure) were compared.
A total of 169 eyes (126 eyes with PDR and 43 eyes with severe NPDR) of 123 participants were included in this study. The detection rate of NVD was 34.91% by UWF-CFP compared with 59.76% by OCT, 59.76% by OCTA, and 62.72% by FA. After excluding 2 cases with epiretinal membranes, the NVD diagnosis detected by OCT was used as the standard. Among 99 eyes diagnosed with NVD by OCT, B-scan OCTA detected NVD with a sensitivity of 97.98%, which was higher than that by en face OCTA (80.81%), VRI Angio (65.66%), and VRI Structure (61.62%) (all P < 0.05). According to its characteristics on OCTA, NVD was divided into four types (12 cases of type I, 6 cases of type II, 39 cases of type III, and 42 cases of type IV). For type I, B-scan OCTA exhibited a higher diagnostic sensitivity than other methods (P < 0.05). For types II and IV, there were no statistically significant differences in the sensitivity of various methods between the two groups (P > 0.05).
OCTA and different OCTA-based methods are significant to the diagnosis of NVD, and the diagnostic accuracy of different detection methods may be related to different types of NVD.
使用光相干断层扫描血管造影术(OCTA)和不同的基于 OCTA 的方法评估和描述视盘新生血管(NVD)。
这是一项回顾性观察研究,纳入了疑似早期 PDR 但无临床明显新生血管(NV)的患者,但临床诊断为增生性糖尿病视网膜病变(PDR)或严重非增生性糖尿病视网膜病变(NPDR)。患者接受标准临床检查和使用 6×6 montage 扫描的 OCTA 成像。两名经过培训的分级员使用不同的成像系统(超广角彩色眼底照相术(UWF-CFP)、OCT、OCTA 和荧光素血管造影术(FA))识别 NVD。此外,还进行了 NVD 的形态学分类。比较了不同基于 OCTA 的方法(B 扫描 OCTA、En-face OCTA、VRI Angio 和 VRI Structure)对 NVD 的检测和形态学分类。
这项研究共纳入了 123 名参与者的 169 只眼(126 只眼患有 PDR,43 只眼患有严重 NPDR)。与 OCT 相比,UWF-CFP 检测 NVD 的检出率为 34.91%,OCT 为 59.76%,OCTA 为 59.76%,FA 为 62.72%。排除 2 例视网膜前膜后,OCT 诊断的 NVD 作为标准。在 99 只经 OCT 诊断为 NVD 的眼中,B 扫描 OCTA 的灵敏度为 97.98%,高于 En-face OCTA(80.81%)、VRI Angio(65.66%)和 VRI Structure(61.62%)(均 P<0.05)。根据 OCTA 的特征,NVD 分为 4 型(12 型 I 型、6 型 II 型、39 型 III 型和 42 型 IV 型)。对于 I 型,B 扫描 OCTA 的诊断灵敏度高于其他方法(P<0.05)。对于 II 型和 IV 型,两种方法之间的敏感性无统计学差异(P>0.05)。
OCTA 和不同的基于 OCTA 的方法对 NVD 的诊断有重要意义,不同检测方法的诊断准确性可能与 NVD 的不同类型有关。