Centre for Safe Medication Practice and Research, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
BMC Med. 2022 Mar 17;20(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02321-4.
Safety after the second dose of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine remains to be elucidated, especially among individuals reporting adverse events after their first dose. This study aims to evaluate the impact of a delayed second dose on all-cause mortality and emergency services.
A territory-wide, retrospective cohort of people who had completed two doses of mRNA (BNT162b2) or inactivated SARS-CoV-2 (CoronaVac) vaccine between February 23 and July 3, 2021, in Hong Kong was analyzed, with linkage to electronic health records retrieved from the Hong Kong Hospital Authority. Vaccine recipients were classified as receiving a second dose within recommended intervals (21-28 days for BNT162b2; 14-28 days for CoronaVac) or delayed. Study outcomes were all-cause mortality, emergency department (ED) visits, and unscheduled hospitalizations within 28 days after the second dose of vaccination.
Among 417,497 BNT162b2 and 354,283 CoronaVac second dose recipients, 3.8% and 28.5% received the second dose beyond the recommended intervals (mean 34.4 and 31.8 days), respectively. During the study period, there were < 5 daily new cases of COVID-19 infections in the community. Delaying the second dose was not associated with all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.185, 95% CI 0.478-2.937, P = 0.714), risk of ED visit (HR = 0.966, 95% CI 0.926-1.008, P = 0.113), and risk of unscheduled hospitalization (HR = 0.956, 95% CI 0.878-1.040, P = 0.294) compared to that within the recommended interval for CoronaVac recipients. No statistically significant differences in all-cause mortality (HR = 4.438, 95% CI 0.951-20.701, P = 0.058), ED visit (HR = 1.037, 95% CI 0.951-1.130, P = 0.411), and unscheduled hospitalization (HR = 1.054, 95% CI 0.867-1.281, P = 0.597) were identified between people who received a second dose of BNT162b2 within and beyond the recommended intervals.
No significant association between delayed second dose of BNT162b2 or CoronaVac and all-cause mortality, ED visit, and unscheduled hospitalization was observed in the present cohort. Regardless of the recommended or delayed schedule for SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, a second dose of both vaccines should be administered to obtain better protection against infection and serious disease. The second dose should be administered within the recommended interval following the manufacturer's product information, until further studies support the benefits of delaying vaccination outweighing the risks.
第二剂 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗接种后的安全性仍需阐明,尤其是在首次接种后报告不良事件的人群中。本研究旨在评估延迟第二剂接种对全因死亡率和急诊服务的影响。
对 2021 年 2 月 23 日至 7 月 3 日期间在香港完成两剂 mRNA(BNT162b2)或灭活 SARS-CoV-2(科兴)疫苗接种的人群进行了一项全港范围的回顾性队列研究,并与从香港医院管理局获取的电子健康记录进行了关联。疫苗接种者被分为在推荐间隔内(BNT162b2 为 21-28 天;科兴为 14-28 天)或延迟接种第二剂疫苗。研究结果为接种第二剂疫苗后 28 天内的全因死亡率、急诊科(ED)就诊和非计划性住院。
在 417497 例 BNT162b2 和 354283 例科兴第二剂疫苗接种者中,分别有 3.8%和 28.5%的人接种第二剂疫苗超过推荐间隔(平均 34.4 天和 31.8 天)。在研究期间,社区中每日新增 COVID-19 感染病例少于 5 例。与在科兴疫苗推荐间隔内接种第二剂疫苗相比,延迟接种第二剂疫苗与全因死亡率(风险比 [HR] = 1.185,95%CI 0.478-2.937,P = 0.714)、ED 就诊风险(HR = 0.966,95%CI 0.926-1.008,P = 0.113)和非计划性住院风险(HR = 0.956,95%CI 0.878-1.040,P = 0.294)无关。与科兴疫苗推荐间隔内接种第二剂疫苗相比,BNT162b2 第二剂接种在推荐间隔内和超过推荐间隔内的全因死亡率(HR = 4.438,95%CI 0.951-20.701,P = 0.058)、ED 就诊(HR = 1.037,95%CI 0.951-1.130,P = 0.411)和非计划性住院(HR = 1.054,95%CI 0.867-1.281,P = 0.597)之间无统计学显著差异。
本队列研究未发现 BNT162b2 或科兴第二剂疫苗接种延迟与全因死亡率、ED 就诊和非计划性住院之间存在显著关联。无论 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗接种的推荐或延迟时间表如何,都应接种两剂疫苗以获得更好的感染和严重疾病保护。第二剂疫苗应按照制造商的产品信息在推荐间隔内接种,直到进一步的研究支持延迟接种的益处超过风险。