Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Institute of Global Health, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Department of Pediatrics, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Lancet. 2022 Feb 5;399(10324):521-529. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00094-0. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
The inactivated whole-virion SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac, Sinovac) has been widely used in a two-dose schedule. We assessed whether a third dose of the homologous or a different vaccine could boost immune responses.
RHH-001 is a phase 4, participant masked, two centre, safety and immunogenicity study of Brazilian adults (18 years and older) in São Paulo or Salvador who had received two doses of CoronaVac 6 months previously. The third heterologous dose was of either a recombinant adenoviral vectored vaccine (Ad26.COV2-S, Janssen), an mRNA vaccine (BNT162b2, Pfizer-BioNTech), or a recombinant adenoviral-vectored ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (AZD1222, AstraZeneca), compared with a third homologous dose of CoronaVac. Participants were randomly assigned (5:6:5:5) by a RedCAP computer randomisation system stratified by site, age group (18-60 years or 61 years and over), and day of randomisation, with a block size of 42. The primary outcome was non-inferiority of anti-spike IgG antibodies 28 days after the booster dose in the heterologous boost groups compared with homologous regimen, using a non-inferiority margin for the geometric mean ratio (heterologous vs homologous) of 0·67. Secondary outcomes included neutralising antibody titres at day 28, local and systemic reactogenicity profiles, adverse events, and serious adverse events. This study was registered with Registro Brasileiro de Ensaios Clínicos, number RBR-9nn3scw.
Between Aug 16, and Sept 1, 2021, 1240 participants were randomly assigned to one of the four groups, of whom 1239 were vaccinated and 1205 were eligible for inclusion in the primary analysis. Antibody concentrations were low before administration of a booster dose with detectable neutralising antibodies of 20·4% (95% CI 12·8-30·1) in adults aged 18-60 years and 8·9% (4·2-16·2) in adults 61 years or older. From baseline to day 28 after the booster vaccine, all groups had a substantial rise in IgG antibody concentrations: the geometric fold-rise was 77 (95% CI 67-88) for Ad26.COV2-S, 152 (134-173) for BNT162b2, 90 (77-104) for ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, and 12 (11-14) for CoronaVac. All heterologous regimens had anti-spike IgG responses at day 28 that were superior to homologous booster responses: geometric mean ratios (heterologous vs homologous) were 6·7 (95% CI 5·8-7·7) for Ad26.COV2-S, 13·4 (11·6-15·3) for BNT162b2, and 7·0 (6·1-8·1) for ChAdOx1 nCoV-19. All heterologous boost regimens induced high concentrations of pseudovirus neutralising antibodies. At day 28, all groups except for the homologous boost in the older adults reached 100% seropositivity: geometric mean ratios (heterologous vs homologous) were 8·7 (95% CI 5·9-12·9) for Ad26.COV2-S vaccine, 21·5 (14·5-31·9) for BNT162b2, and 10·6 (7·2-15·6) for ChAdOx1 nCoV-19. Live virus neutralising antibodies were also boosted against delta (B.1.617.2) and omicron variants (B.1.1.529). There were five serious adverse events. Three of which were considered possibly related to the vaccine received: one in the BNT162b2 group and two in the Ad26.COV2-S group. All participants recovered and were discharged home.
Antibody concentrations were low at 6 months after previous immunisation with two doses of CoronaVac. However, all four vaccines administered as a third dose induced a significant increase in binding and neutralising antibodies, which could improve protection against infection. Heterologous boosting resulted in more robust immune responses than homologous boosting and might enhance protection.
Ministry of Health, Brazil.
已广泛使用两剂灭活全病毒 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗(科兴,CoronaVac)。我们评估了同源或不同疫苗的第三剂能否增强免疫反应。
RHH-001 是巴西圣保罗或萨尔瓦多成年人(18 岁及以上)的 4 期、参与者盲法、双中心、安全性和免疫原性研究,这些参与者在 6 个月前接受了两剂科兴疫苗。第三剂异源疫苗为腺病毒载体重组疫苗(Janssen 的 Ad26.COV2-S)、mRNA 疫苗(辉瑞-生物科技的 BNT162b2)或腺病毒载体 ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 疫苗(阿斯利康的 AZD1222),与第三剂同源科兴疫苗进行比较。参与者通过 RedCAP 计算机随机系统按地点、年龄组(18-60 岁或 61 岁及以上)和随机化日分层,以 42 个为块大小进行随机分组(5:6:5:5)。主要结局是异源增强组与同源方案相比,在增强后 28 天的抗刺突 IgG 抗体非劣效性,非劣效性边缘为几何均数比(异源比同源)0.67。次要结局包括第 28 天的中和抗体滴度、局部和全身反应特征、不良事件和严重不良事件。该研究在巴西临床试验注册中心注册,注册号为 RBR-9nn3scw。
在 2021 年 8 月 16 日至 9 月 1 日期间,1240 名参与者被随机分配到四组中的一组,其中 1239 名接种了疫苗,1205 名符合主要分析的纳入标准。在给予增强剂之前,抗体浓度较低,18-60 岁成年人中可检测到的中和抗体率为 20.4%(95%CI,12.8-30.1),61 岁及以上成年人中为 8.9%(4.2-16.2)。从基线到增强疫苗后第 28 天,所有组的 IgG 抗体浓度均显著升高:Ad26.COV2-S 的几何倍数增长为 77(95%CI,67-88),BNT162b2 为 152(134-173),ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 为 90(77-104),科兴为 12(11-14)。所有异源方案在第 28 天的抗刺突 IgG 反应均优于同源增强反应:几何均数比(异源比同源)为 Ad26.COV2-S 为 6.7(95%CI,5.8-7.7),BNT162b2 为 13.4(11.6-15.3),ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 为 7.0(6.1-8.1)。所有异源增强方案均诱导出高浓度的假病毒中和抗体。在第 28 天,除老年组同源增强外,所有组的血清阳性率均达到 100%:Ad26.COV2-S 疫苗的几何均数比(异源比同源)为 8.7(95%CI,5.9-12.9),BNT162b2 为 21.5(14.5-31.9),ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 为 10.6(7.2-15.6)。针对 delta(B.1.617.2)和 omicron 变异株(B.1.1.529)的活病毒中和抗体也得到了增强。有 5 例严重不良事件。其中 3 例被认为可能与接种的疫苗有关:1 例发生在 BNT162b2 组,2 例发生在 Ad26.COV2-S 组。所有参与者均康复并出院回家。
在先前接种两剂科兴疫苗 6 个月后,抗体浓度较低。然而,所有四种疫苗作为第三剂接种都显著增加了结合和中和抗体,这可能提高对感染的保护。异源增强比同源增强产生了更强大的免疫反应,可能增强保护作用。
巴西卫生部。