Department of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada.
NTT Communication Science Laboratories, 3-1 Morinosato Wakamiya, Atsugi, Kanagawa, 243-0198, Japan.
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 16;12(1):4509. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08291-0.
This study examines how people learn to perform lower limb control in a novel task with a hoverboard requiring to maintain dynamic balance. We designed an experiment to investigate the learning of hoverboard balance and two control strategies: A hip strategy, which mainly uses hip movements to change the angle of the foot, and an ankle strategy relying more on ankle motion to control the orientation of hoverboard plates controlling the motion. Motor learning was indicated by a significant [Formula: see text]% decrease in the trial completion time (p < 0.001) and a significant 24 ± 11% decrease in total muscle activation (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the participants, who had no prior experience riding a hoverboard, learned an ankle strategy to maintain their balance and control the hoverboard. This is supported by significantly stronger cross-correlation, phase synchrony, lower dynamic time warping distance between the hoverboard plate orientation controlling hoverboard motion, and the ankle angle when compared to the hip angle. The adopted ankle strategy was found to be robust to the foot orientation despite salient changes in muscle group activation patterns. Comparison with results of an experienced hoverboard rider confirmed that the first-time riders adopted an ankle strategy.
本研究考察了人们如何在需要保持动态平衡的悬滑板新任务中学习下肢控制。我们设计了一个实验来研究悬滑板平衡的学习和两种控制策略:一种是髋关节策略,主要使用髋关节运动来改变脚的角度,另一种是踝关节策略,更多地依赖踝关节运动来控制悬滑板的方向,从而控制运动。运动学习表现为试验完成时间显著减少[Formula: see text]%(p < 0.001)和总肌肉激活显著减少 24 ± 11%(p < 0.001)。此外,参与者没有悬滑板骑行的经验,学会了一种踝关节策略来保持平衡和控制悬滑板。这得到了更强的交叉相关、相位同步的支持,悬滑板板方向控制悬滑板运动和踝关节角度之间的动态时间扭曲距离也更低,与髋关节角度相比。尽管肌肉群激活模式发生了明显变化,但所采用的踝关节策略对于脚的方向仍然具有稳健性。与有经验的悬滑板骑手的结果进行比较证实,初次骑手采用了踝关节策略。