Gerhardinger Leopoldo Cavaleri, Holzkämper Eike, de Andrade Mariana Martins, Corrêa Marina Ribeiro, Turra Alexander
Oceanographic Institute, University of São Paulo, Praça Do Oceanográfico, 191, Cidade Universitária, São Paulo, SP 05508-120 Brazil.
Social Sciences Department, Social Ecological Systems Analysis Working Group, Leibniz Centre for Tropical Marine Research, Fahrenheitstr. 6, Annexe, 28359 Bremen, Germany.
Marit Stud. 2022;21(1):131-152. doi: 10.1007/s40152-021-00250-1. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
The globally accelerating environmental crisis calls for radical changes in the governance of ocean resources towards a more sustainable and socially equitable world. Transdisciplinary sustainability research and networked knowledge-to-action approaches are critical parts of this change. The effective application of such approaches still puzzles social actors (individuals and networks) willing to act in more transformative ways. We conducted twelve participatory network mapping activities to assess the perception of high-level federal government institutional entrepreneurs on the structure and dynamics of an emerging socio-political arena for marine spatial planning (MSP) in Brazil. Our informants, mostly cognizant of their own intra-governmental structures, anticipate the MSP arena to remain self-enclosed, with changes only occurring within the federal government structures in the coming years. Their perceptions were largely conservative, narrow, and unambitious and therefore unfit to generate regime transformations. The limited awareness of response capacities beyond the federal government potentially leads to the endurement of the low performance already present in the MSP arena. Results from the participatory network mapping informed a five-step functional ocean governability analysis pointing to key potential contributions to support a critical turn in MSP: 1. envision situated interactional narratives to leverage regime shifts; 2. build a shared understanding of and anticipating transformative coevolutionary dynamics; 3. build awareness of the potential synergies among disparate but innovative area-based responses; 4. specify inter-network-based limitations and the necessary changes underpinning potential leaps in performance levels of ocean governance orders; 5. make power asymmetries explicit to stir structurally tailored strategic action by less influential groups. We discuss the potential role of inter-network strategies and actions and how they may confront the symptoms of depoliticized MSP pathways and the risks of it becoming an instrument of further marginalisation and power asymmetry in Brazil.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40152-021-00250-1.
全球范围内不断加速的环境危机要求对海洋资源治理进行彻底变革,以实现更可持续和社会公平的世界。跨学科可持续性研究和网络化的知识转化行动方法是这一变革的关键部分。此类方法的有效应用仍然困扰着那些希望以更具变革性方式行动的社会行为体(个人和网络)。我们开展了12次参与式网络映射活动,以评估巴西联邦政府高层机构创业者对新兴海洋空间规划(MSP)社会政治领域的结构和动态的认知。我们的受访者大多了解其政府内部结构,预计MSP领域将保持自我封闭,未来几年只会在联邦政府结构内部发生变化。他们的认知在很大程度上保守、狭隘且缺乏雄心,因此不适合推动制度变革。对联邦政府以外应对能力的有限认知可能导致MSP领域持续存在低效状况。参与式网络映射的结果为一项五步功能性海洋可治理性分析提供了依据,该分析指出了支持MSP关键转变的关键潜在贡献:1. 设想情境互动叙事以推动制度转变;2. 建立对变革性共同进化动态的共同理解并进行预测;3. 认识到不同但创新的基于区域的应对措施之间的潜在协同效应;4. 明确基于网络间的限制以及支撑海洋治理秩序绩效水平潜在飞跃所需的必要变革;5. 明确权力不对称,以促使影响力较小的群体采取针对性的战略行动。我们讨论了网络间战略和行动的潜在作用,以及它们如何应对MSP路径去政治化的症状,以及MSP在巴西成为进一步边缘化和权力不对称工具的风险。
在线版本包含可在10.1007/s40152-021-00250-1获取的补充材料。