• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在训练有素的自行车运动员的性能适应方面,为期12周的阶段性训练与传统周期性训练之间没有差异。

No Differences Between 12 Weeks of Block- vs. Traditional-Periodized Training in Performance Adaptations in Trained Cyclists.

作者信息

Almquist Nicki Winfield, Eriksen Hanne Berg, Wilhelmsen Malene, Hamarsland Håvard, Ing Steven, Ellefsen Stian, Sandbakk Øyvind, Rønnestad Bent R, Skovereng Knut

机构信息

Section for Health and Exercise Physiology, Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, Lillehammer, Norway.

Centre for Elite Sports Research, Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.

出版信息

Front Physiol. 2022 Mar 1;13:837634. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.837634. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fphys.2022.837634
PMID:35299664
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8921659/
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of 12 weeks load-matched block periodization (BP,  = 14), using weekly concentration of high- (HIT), moderate- (MIT), and low- (LIT) intensity training, with traditional periodization (TP,  = 16) using a weekly, cyclic progressive increase in training load of HIT-, MIT-, and LIT-sessions in trained cyclists (peak oxygen uptake: 58 ± 8 ml·kg·min). Red blood cell volume increased 10 ± 16% ( = 0.029) more in BP compared to TP, while capillaries around type I fibers increased 20 ± 12% ( = 0.002) more in TP compared to BP from Pre to Post12. No other group differences were found in time-trial (TT) performances or muscular-, or hematological adaptations. However, both groups improved 5 and 40-min TT power by 9 ± 9% ( < 0.001) and 8 ± 9% ( < 0.001), maximal aerobic power (W) and power output (PO) at 4 mmol·L blood lactate (W), by 6 ± 7 ( = 0.001) and 10 ± 12% ( = 0.001), and gross efficiency (GE) in a semi-fatigued state by 0.5 ± 1.1%-points ( = 0.026). In contrast, GE in fresh state and VO were unaltered in both groups. The muscle protein content of β-hydroxyacyl (HAD) increased by 55 ± 58% in TP only, while both TP and BP increased the content of cytochrome c oxidase subunit IV (COXIV) by 72 ± 34%. Muscle enzyme activities of citrate synthase (CS) and phosphofructokinase (PFK) were unaltered. TP increased capillary-to-fiber ratio and capillary around fiber (CAF) type I by 36 ± 15% ( < 0.001) and 17 ± 8% ( = 0.025), respectively, while BP increased capillary density (CD) by 28 ± 24% ( = 0.048) from Pre to Post12. The present study shows no difference in performance between BP and "best practice"-TP of endurance training intensities using a cyclic, progressively increasing training load in trained cyclists. However, hematological and muscle capillary adaptations may differ.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较12周负荷匹配的阶段化训练(BP,n = 14)与传统阶段化训练(TP,n = 16)对训练有素的自行车运动员(峰值摄氧量:58±8 ml·kg·min)的影响。BP组采用每周高(HIT)、中(MIT)、低(LIT)强度训练的浓度,TP组采用每周HIT、MIT、LIT训练课的训练负荷循环渐进增加的方式。与TP组相比,BP组红细胞体积增加了10±16%(P = 0.029),而从训练前到第12周后,TP组I型纤维周围的毛细血管比BP组增加了20±12%(P = 0.002)。在计时赛(TT)成绩、肌肉或血液学适应方面未发现其他组间差异。然而,两组的5分钟和40分钟TT功率分别提高了9±9%(P < 0.001)和8±9%(P < 0.001),4 mmol·L血乳酸时的最大有氧功率(W)和功率输出(PO)分别提高了6±7(P = 0.001)和10±12%(P = 0.001),半疲劳状态下的总效率(GE)提高了0.5±1.1个百分点(P = 0.026)。相比之下,两组在新鲜状态下的GE和VO均未改变。仅TP组的β-羟酰基辅酶A脱氢酶(HAD)肌肉蛋白含量增加了55±58%,而TP组和BP组的细胞色素c氧化酶亚基IV(COXIV)含量均增加了72±34%。柠檬酸合酶(CS)和磷酸果糖激酶(PFK)的肌肉酶活性未改变。TP组的毛细血管与纤维比率和I型纤维周围的毛细血管(CAF)分别增加了36±15%(P < 0.001)和17±8%(P = 0.025),而BP组从训练前到第12周后毛细血管密度(CD)增加了28±24%(P = 0.048)。本研究表明,在训练有素的自行车运动员中,使用循环渐进增加训练负荷的耐力训练强度,BP组和“最佳实践”TP组在表现上没有差异。然而,血液学和肌肉毛细血管适应可能有所不同。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0262/8921659/812a4c221c2e/fphys-13-837634-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0262/8921659/3b5b1726b5b9/fphys-13-837634-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0262/8921659/fda5f87d067d/fphys-13-837634-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0262/8921659/731b0c67b993/fphys-13-837634-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0262/8921659/812a4c221c2e/fphys-13-837634-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0262/8921659/3b5b1726b5b9/fphys-13-837634-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0262/8921659/fda5f87d067d/fphys-13-837634-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0262/8921659/731b0c67b993/fphys-13-837634-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0262/8921659/812a4c221c2e/fphys-13-837634-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
No Differences Between 12 Weeks of Block- vs. Traditional-Periodized Training in Performance Adaptations in Trained Cyclists.在训练有素的自行车运动员的性能适应方面,为期12周的阶段性训练与传统周期性训练之间没有差异。
Front Physiol. 2022 Mar 1;13:837634. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.837634. eCollection 2022.
2
Block periodization of high-intensity aerobic intervals provides superior training effects in trained cyclists.高强度间歇有氧的分段周期训练为有训练基础的自行车运动员提供更优的训练效果。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014 Feb;24(1):34-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2012.01485.x. Epub 2012 May 31.
3
Effects of 12 weeks of block periodization on performance and performance indices in well-trained cyclists.12 周分段周期训练对优秀自行车运动员的运动表现和运动指标的影响。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014 Apr;24(2):327-35. doi: 10.1111/sms.12016. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
4
5-week block periodization increases aerobic power in elite cross-country skiers.为期5周的阶段性周期训练可提高优秀越野滑雪运动员的有氧能力。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2016 Feb;26(2):140-6. doi: 10.1111/sms.12418. Epub 2015 Feb 3.
5
The Effect of Different High-Intensity Periodization Models on Endurance Adaptations.不同高强度周期化训练模型对耐力适应性的影响。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016 Nov;48(11):2165-2174. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001007.
6
No Additional Benefits of Block- Over Evenly-Distributed High-Intensity Interval Training within a Polarized Microcycle.在极化微周期内,与均匀分布的高强度间歇训练相比,板块训练并无额外益处。
Front Physiol. 2017 Jun 13;8:413. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00413. eCollection 2017.
7
Block vs. Traditional Periodization of HIT: Two Different Paths to Success for the World's Best Cross-Country Skier.高强度间歇训练的板块周期化与传统周期化:世界顶级越野滑雪运动员取得成功的两条不同途径
Front Physiol. 2019 Apr 5;10:375. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00375. eCollection 2019.
8
Training Periodization, Intensity Distribution, and Volume in Trained Cyclists: A Systematic Review.训练周期化、强度分布及训练有素的自行车运动员的训练量:一项系统评价
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2023 Jan 14;18(2):112-122. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2022-0302. Print 2023 Feb 1.
9
Impact of a 4-Week Intensified Endurance Training Intervention on Markers of Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (RED-S) and Performance Among Well-Trained Male Cyclists.四周强化耐力训练对运动相关的相对能量不足(RED-S)标志物和优秀男性自行车运动员表现的影响。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020 Sep 25;11:512365. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.512365. eCollection 2020.
10
A comparison of traditional and block periodized strength training programs in trained athletes.传统周期与板块周期力量训练方案在训练有素运动员中的对比。
J Strength Cond Res. 2014 Apr;28(4):990-7. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000366.

引用本文的文献

1
From Amateur to Professional Cycling: A Case Study on the Training Characteristics of a Zwift Academy Winner.从业余到职业自行车运动:Zwift学院冠军训练特点的案例研究
Sports (Basel). 2025 Jul 16;13(7):234. doi: 10.3390/sports13070234.
2
The higher oxygen consumption during multiple short intervals is sex-independent and not influenced by skeletal muscle characteristics in well-trained cyclists.在训练有素的自行车运动员中,多次短时间间隔的耗氧量较高与性别无关,也不受骨骼肌特征的影响。
Eur J Sport Sci. 2024 Nov;24(11):1614-1626. doi: 10.1002/ejsc.12214. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
3
Training Characteristics, Performance, and Body Composition of Three U23 Elite Female Triathletes throughout a Season.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of Including Sprints in One Weekly Low-Intensity Training Session During the Transition Period of Elite Cyclists.在精英自行车运动员的过渡期,每周一次低强度训练课中加入冲刺训练的效果。
Front Physiol. 2020 Sep 11;11:1000. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.01000. eCollection 2020.
2
Block periodization of endurance training - a systematic review and meta-analysis.耐力训练的阶段性周期化——一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Open Access J Sports Med. 2019 Oct 17;10:145-160. doi: 10.2147/OAJSM.S180408. eCollection 2019.
3
Forty high-intensity interval training sessions blunt exercise-induced changes in the nuclear protein content of PGC-1α and p53 in human skeletal muscle.
三名U23精英女子铁人三项运动员在一个赛季中的训练特征、表现和身体成分
Sports (Basel). 2024 Feb 7;12(2):53. doi: 10.3390/sports12020053.
4
Effect of Acute Self-Myofascial Release on Pain and Exercise Performance for Cycling Club Members with Iliotibial Band Friction Syndrome.急性自我肌筋膜松解对髂胫束摩擦综合征自行车俱乐部成员疼痛和运动表现的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 30;19(23):15993. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315993.
5
How do world class top 5 Giro d'Italia finishers train? A qualitative multiple case study.世界级环意大利自行车赛前五名完赛者如何训练?一项定性的多案例研究。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2022 Dec;32(12):1738-1746. doi: 10.1111/sms.14201. Epub 2022 Jun 18.
6
Performance-Related Physiological and Haematological Changes During Pregnancy and Postpartum in a Well-Trained Cyclist Performing Endurance Training.一名进行耐力训练的训练有素的自行车运动员在孕期和产后与运动表现相关的生理和血液学变化
Front Physiol. 2022 May 9;13:762950. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.762950. eCollection 2022.
四十次高强度间歇训练使人体骨骼肌中 PGC-1α 和 p53 的核蛋白含量的运动诱导变化趋于平缓。
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2020 Feb 1;318(2):E224-E236. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00233.2019. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
4
Training Characteristics of Male and Female Professional Road Cyclists: A 4-Year Retrospective Analysis.男女职业公路自行车运动员的训练特征:一项为期4年的回顾性分析。
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2019 Nov 5;15(4):534-540. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2019-0320. Print 2020 Apr 1.
5
Block vs. Traditional Periodization of HIT: Two Different Paths to Success for the World's Best Cross-Country Skier.高强度间歇训练的板块周期化与传统周期化:世界顶级越野滑雪运动员取得成功的两条不同途径
Front Physiol. 2019 Apr 5;10:375. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00375. eCollection 2019.
6
Biological Background of Block Periodized Endurance Training: A Review.块周期耐力训练的生物学背景:综述。
Sports Med. 2019 Jan;49(1):31-39. doi: 10.1007/s40279-018-1019-9.
7
An Integrated, Multifactorial Approach to Periodization for Optimal Performance in Individual and Team Sports.一种综合的、多因素的周期化方法,以实现个人和团队运动的最佳表现。
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2018 May 1;13(5):538-561. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2018-0093.
8
No Additional Benefits of Block- Over Evenly-Distributed High-Intensity Interval Training within a Polarized Microcycle.在极化微周期内,与均匀分布的高强度间歇训练相比,板块训练并无额外益处。
Front Physiol. 2017 Jun 13;8:413. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00413. eCollection 2017.
9
The effects of block training on pacing during 20-km cycling time trial.20公里自行车计时赛中分段训练对配速的影响。
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2017 Apr;42(4):391-398. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2016-0072. Epub 2016 Dec 15.
10
Cardiovascular Adaptations to Exercise Training.心血管系统对运动训练的适应性
Compr Physiol. 2015 Dec 15;6(1):1-32. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c140080.