Yao Guorong, Qiu Jian, Zhu Fengjia, Wang Xiaoxie
Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Huzhou Central Hospital, Affiliated Central Hospital Huzhou University, Huzhou, China.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Mar 1;9:843262. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.843262. eCollection 2022.
Cervical cancer is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality for women worldwide. Different histopathological cervical cancer subtypes (i.e., adenocarcinoma/adenosquamous carcinoma, and squamous cell carcinoma) are all treated similarly with definitive radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy, but studies have reported differing survival prognoses. In this review and meta-analysis, we compared the disease-free and overall survivals of patients with cervical cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy according to the histopathological subtypes.
To compare the disease-free and overall survivals of patients with adenocarcinoma/adenosquamous carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma cervical cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy.
We systematically searched the Web of Science, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Scopus, and MEDLINE academic databases following PRISMA guidelines. We identified publications to conduct a random-effects meta-analysis to evaluate the disease-free and overall survivals of patients with cervical adenocarcinoma/adenosquamous carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma treated with definitive radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy.
From 963 studies, we found eight eligible ones with 13,859 patients with cervical cancer (mean age, 52.2 ± 7.9 years). Our meta-analysis revealed a poorer outcome of disease-free (hazard ratio, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.28-1.79) and overall (hazard ratio 1.41; 95% CI, 1.26-1.57) survivals for patients with adenocarcinoma/adenosquamous carcinoma undergoing definitive radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy than for those with squamous cell carcinoma undergoing similar treatments. We also observed that larger tumor size and advanced tumor stage are also significant prognostic factors that adversely impact survival outcomes in cervical cancer patients undergoing definitive radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy.
Our results show poor disease-free and overall survivals for patients with cervical cancer and adenocarcinoma/adenosquamous carcinoma than for those with squamous cell carcinoma after treatment with definitive radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Our findings clarify the risks associated with the conventional management of cervical cancer according to the histological type.
宫颈癌是全球女性发病和死亡的主要原因。不同组织病理学类型的宫颈癌亚型(即腺癌/腺鳞癌和鳞状细胞癌)在接受根治性放疗或同步放化疗时的治疗方式相似,但研究报告的生存预后有所不同。在本综述和荟萃分析中,我们根据组织病理学亚型比较了接受根治性放疗或同步放化疗的宫颈癌患者的无病生存率和总生存率。
比较接受根治性放疗或同步放化疗的腺癌/腺鳞癌和鳞状细胞癌宫颈癌患者的无病生存率和总生存率。
我们按照PRISMA指南系统检索了Web of Science、EMBASE、CENTRAL、Scopus和MEDLINE学术数据库。我们确定了相关出版物,进行随机效应荟萃分析,以评估接受根治性放疗或同步放化疗的宫颈腺癌/腺鳞癌和鳞状细胞癌患者的无病生存率和总生存率。
从963项研究中,我们发现了8项符合条件的研究,涉及13859例宫颈癌患者(平均年龄52.2±7.9岁)。我们的荟萃分析显示,与接受类似治疗的鳞状细胞癌患者相比,接受根治性放疗或同步放化疗的腺癌/腺鳞癌患者的无病生存率(风险比,1.51;95%可信区间,1.28-.79)和总生存率(风险比1.41;95%可信区间,1.26-1.57)较差。我们还观察到,较大的肿瘤大小和较晚的肿瘤分期也是影响接受根治性放疗或同步放化疗的宫颈癌患者生存结果的重要预后因素。
我们的结果显示,与鳞状细胞癌患者相比,接受根治性放疗或同步放化疗的宫颈癌和腺癌/腺鳞癌患者的无病生存率和总生存率较差。我们的研究结果阐明了根据组织学类型对宫颈癌进行传统治疗所涉及的风险。