Larkins R G, Zajac J, Saunders R, Read A, Hopper J L
Aust N Z J Med. 1986 Apr;16(2):206-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.1986.tb01149.x.
A double-blind comparative trial of the effectiveness and antigenicity of semisynthetic human insulin (Novo) and highly purified (Monocomponent) porcine insulin was performed over a 12 month period in 20 diabetic subjects newly treated with insulin. Human insulin was shown to be indistinguishable from porcine insulin of comparable purity with respect to plasma glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin levels and insulin dose requirements. Human insulin was no less antigenic than porcine insulin; significant IgG-associated insulin binding activity was detected in six of the ten patients in the human insulin treated group and four of the ten patients in the porcine insulin treated group. In all patients, the binding activity was of low capacity. No adverse reactions to human insulin were noted. It is concluded that semisynthetic human insulin, like purified porcine insulin, is safe and effective. Although there may be advantages for human insulin in the setting of insulin allergy, this study does not indicate that human insulin has advantages over purified porcine insulin with respect to elicitation of antibodies of the IgG class.
对20名新接受胰岛素治疗的糖尿病患者进行了为期12个月的双盲对照试验,比较半合成人胰岛素(诺和灵)和高纯度(单组分)猪胰岛素的有效性和抗原性。结果显示,就血糖、糖化血红蛋白水平及胰岛素剂量需求而言,人胰岛素与纯度相当的猪胰岛素并无差异。人胰岛素的抗原性并不低于猪胰岛素;在接受人胰岛素治疗组的10名患者中有6名、接受猪胰岛素治疗组的10名患者中有4名检测到了与IgG相关的显著胰岛素结合活性。在所有患者中,结合活性的能力较低。未观察到对人胰岛素的不良反应。结论是,半合成人胰岛素与纯化猪胰岛素一样安全有效。尽管在胰岛素过敏的情况下人胰岛素可能具有优势,但本研究并未表明人胰岛素在诱发IgG类抗体方面优于纯化猪胰岛素。