Debanne Thierry, Volossovitch Anna
University Paris Est Creteil, LIRTES.
CIPER, Faculdade De Motricidade Humana, BIOLAD, Universidade de Lisboa.
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2023 Mar;94(1):151-162. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2021.1948955. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
The purposes of this research were: 1) in a preliminary study, to identify regulatory strategies used by players and coaches according to situation reward structure (Gains vs. Losses); and 2) in the main study, to analyze the effect of the interaction between situation reward structure (Gains vs. Losses) and regulatory strategy (Prevention vs. Promotion) on team performance (scoring a goal) in real-world settings. In the preliminary study, 25 adult male handball players and 19 coaches playing and coaching at national level in the French championships completed a version of the Regulatory Focus Strategies Scales after reading four handball game scenarios (two gain-oriented and two loss-avoidance oriented). Two-way ANOVA with repeated measures revealed that when the reward structure was gain-oriented, participants had higher scores in promotion regulatory strategy than in prevention regulatory strategy, and conversely. For the main study, a sample of 199 game phases was selected from 84 games played in the Lidl Star League (2017-2018 season). Mixed method analysis revealed a significant team regulatory fit effect, that is an interaction effect between reward structure and regulatory focus strategy on team performance. When there was a fit, both in loss-avoidance oriented and gain-oriented reward structure, performance was higher (OR = 1.64 and OR = 0.86, respectively) than when there was a mismatch (OR = 0.59 and OR = 0.27). These results confirm the applicability of the Regulatory Fit Theory in a real-world setting with professional players, and extend grounded social cognition research regulatory fit literature to team level.
1)在初步研究中,根据情境奖励结构(收益与损失)确定运动员和教练所采用的调节策略;2)在主要研究中,分析情境奖励结构(收益与损失)与调节策略(预防与促进)之间的相互作用对现实世界中团队表现(进球得分)的影响。在初步研究中,25名参加法国锦标赛国家级比赛的成年男性手球运动员和19名教练在阅读了四个手球比赛场景(两个以收益为导向和两个以避免损失为导向)后,完成了一份调节焦点策略量表。重复测量的双向方差分析表明,当奖励结构以收益为导向时,参与者在促进调节策略方面的得分高于预防调节策略,反之亦然。在主要研究中,从Lidl明星联赛(2017 - 2018赛季)的84场比赛中选取了199个比赛阶段作为样本。混合方法分析揭示了显著的团队调节匹配效应,即奖励结构与调节焦点策略之间对团队表现的相互作用效应。当存在匹配时,无论是在以避免损失为导向还是以收益为导向的奖励结构中,表现都高于不匹配时(优势比分别为1.64和0.86)(优势比分别为0.59和0.27)。这些结果证实了调节匹配理论在有职业运动员的现实世界环境中的适用性,并将基于社会认知的调节匹配文献扩展到团队层面。