• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

完整的家庭吸烟禁令调查分析:改善美国加利福尼亚州性少数成年人群体健康公平的机会。

Complete home smoking ban survey analysis: an opportunity to improve health equity among sexual minority adults in California, USA.

机构信息

Oregon Research Institute, 1776 Millrace Dr., Eugene, OR, 97403, USA.

Oregon State University, College of Public Health and Human Sciences, School of Social and Behavioral Health Sciences, Corvallis, OR, USA.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2022 Mar 18;22(1):537. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12891-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-022-12891-w
PMID:35303831
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8932195/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Increasing the proportion of adults living in smoke-free homes is a US Healthy People 2020 objective. Complete home smoking bans are associated with higher odds of smoking cessation attempts and cessation duration. Sexual minority adults have disproportionality higher rates of smoking. This study investigates correlates of having a complete home smoking ban among sexual minority adults in California.

METHODS

Secondary data analyses of the California Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (CA BRFSS), 2014-2016. The CA BRFSS telephone survey of adults was conducted in English and Spanish and used random digit dial for landline and cell numbers. Weighted descriptives were stratified by sexual orientation and biological sex. Weighted bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses included only sexual minorities (i.e., lesbian, gay, bisexual) and were analyzed as a group and separately by biological sex to account for intragroup variances. The final weighted total of sexual minority adults (N = 359,236) included sexual minority adult females (N = 163,490) and sexual minority adult males (N = 195,746).

RESULTS

Sexual minority adults in California had a lower prevalence of complete home smoking bans (Female 76.2%; Male 75.7%), higher prevalence of current cigarette smoking (Female 23.3%; Male 17.4%) and of e-cigarette use (Female 5.8%; Male 6.4%) than their straight counterparts. Sexual minorities that smoke everyday (Female Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) 0.26, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.11-0.63; Male AOR 0.24, 95% CI 0.01-0.56) or some days (Female AOR 0.28, 95% CI 0.09-0.90) had lower adjusted odds of having a complete home smoking ban compared to those who never smoked.

CONCLUSIONS

Smoking everyday was the only consistent predictor of not having a complete home smoking ban among sexual minority adults. Focused efforts to increase prevalence of complete home smoking bans should address smoking status to improve health equity among sexual minority adults.

摘要

背景

提高居住在无烟家庭中的成年人比例是美国 2020 年健康人群目标之一。全面的家庭禁烟令与更高的戒烟尝试率和戒烟持续时间相关。性少数群体成年人的吸烟率不成比例地更高。本研究调查了加利福尼亚州性少数群体成年人拥有全面家庭禁烟令的相关因素。

方法

对加利福尼亚州行为风险因素监测系统(CA BRFSS)2014-2016 年的二次数据进行分析。CA BRFSS 通过英语和西班牙语对成年人进行电话调查,并对固定电话和移动电话使用随机数字拨号。按性取向和生物性别对加权描述进行分层。仅对性少数群体(即女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋)进行加权双变量和多变量逻辑回归分析,并作为一个群体进行分析,同时按生物性别进行分析,以解释群体内差异。最终包括性少数群体成年人(N=359236 人)的加权总数包括性少数群体成年女性(N=163490 人)和性少数群体成年男性(N=195746 人)。

结果

加利福尼亚州的性少数群体成年人全面家庭禁烟令的流行率较低(女性 76.2%;男性 75.7%),当前吸烟率较高(女性 23.3%;男性 17.4%),电子烟使用率较高(女性 5.8%;男性 6.4%)与他们的异性恋同龄人相比。每天吸烟(女性调整后的优势比(AOR)0.26,95%置信区间(CI)0.11-0.63;男性 AOR 0.24,95% CI 0.01-0.56)或有时吸烟(女性 AOR 0.28,95% CI 0.09-0.90)的性少数群体与从不吸烟的性少数群体相比,调整后的优势比更低。

结论

每天吸烟是性少数群体成年人没有全面家庭禁烟令的唯一一致预测因素。为提高全面家庭禁烟令的流行率而进行的有针对性的努力应针对吸烟状况,以改善性少数群体成年人的健康公平。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67e1/8932195/56c0be88dea5/12889_2022_12891_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67e1/8932195/56c0be88dea5/12889_2022_12891_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67e1/8932195/56c0be88dea5/12889_2022_12891_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Complete home smoking ban survey analysis: an opportunity to improve health equity among sexual minority adults in California, USA.完整的家庭吸烟禁令调查分析:改善美国加利福尼亚州性少数成年人群体健康公平的机会。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Mar 18;22(1):537. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12891-w.
2
Cigarette Smoking and the Role of Menthol in Tobacco Use Inequalities for Sexual Minorities.吸烟与薄荷醇在烟草使用不平等中的作用:性少数群体。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2021 Oct 7;23(11):1942-1946. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntab101.
3
Tobacco Product Use Among Sexual Minority Adults: Findings From the 2012-2013 National Adult Tobacco Survey.性少数成年人群体中的烟草制品使用情况:2012 - 2013年全国成人烟草调查结果
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Apr;50(4):e91-e100. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.07.041. Epub 2015 Oct 31.
4
Real-time predictors of smoking among sexual minority and heterosexual young adults: An ecological momentary assessment study.性少数群体和异性恋年轻成年人吸烟的实时预测因素:一项生态瞬时评估研究。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Nov 1;192:51-58. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.07.021. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
5
A double disparity: Rural sexual minorities and tobacco use among U.S. adults.双重差距:美国农村性少数群体与烟草使用。
Addict Behav. 2023 Feb;137:107527. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2022.107527. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
6
Cigarette Smoking Disparities among Sexual Minority Cancer Survivors.性少数群体癌症幸存者中的吸烟差异
Prev Med Rep. 2015;2:283-286. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2015.04.004.
7
Cardiovascular Disease Disparities in Sexual Minority Adults: An Examination of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (2014-2016).心血管疾病在性少数群体成年人中的差异:对行为风险因素监测系统(2014-2016 年)的考察。
Am J Health Promot. 2019 May;33(4):576-585. doi: 10.1177/0890117118810246. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
8
Sexual minority substance use disparities: Bisexual women at elevated risk relative to other sexual minority groups.性少数群体物质使用差异:双性恋女性相对于其他性少数群体处于更高的风险之中。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Jan 1;206:107755. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.107755. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
9
Trends in sexual orientation disparities in cigarette smoking: Intersections between race/ethnicity and sex.吸烟行为的性取向差异趋势:种族/民族和性别的交叉点。
Prev Med. 2021 Dec;153:106760. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106760. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
10
Cigarette smoking, e-cigarette use, and sexual identity among high school students in the USA.美国高中生中的吸烟、电子烟使用和性认同。
Eur J Pediatr. 2019 Sep;178(9):1343-1351. doi: 10.1007/s00431-019-03420-w. Epub 2019 Jul 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative analysis of stroke burden between ages 20-54 and over 55 years: based on the global burden of disease study 2019.20至54岁与55岁以上人群中风负担的比较分析:基于《2019年全球疾病负担研究》
BMC Public Health. 2025 Apr 5;25(1):1293. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22460-6.
2
Secondhand tobacco smoke exposure in homes and vehicles in youth: disparities among racial, and sexual and gender minorities.家庭和交通工具中二手烟草烟雾暴露与青少年:种族、性和性别少数群体的差异。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 23;12:1370552. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1370552. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
E-cigarette Use and Risk Behaviors among Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Adults: The Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) Survey.女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和跨性别成年人中的电子烟使用与风险行为:行为风险因素监测系统(BRFSS)调查
Kans J Med. 2020 Dec 11;13:318-321. doi: 10.17161/kjm.vol13.13861. eCollection 2020.
2
Cigarette Smoking and Minority Stress Across Age Cohorts in a National Sample of Sexual Minorities: Results From the Generations Study.在全国性的性少数群体样本中,不同年龄群体的吸烟与少数群体压力:世代研究的结果。
Ann Behav Med. 2021 Jun 2;55(6):530-542. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaaa079.
3
Disparities in adult cigarette smoking and smokeless tobacco use by sexual identity.
不同性别的成年烟民和无烟烟草使用者之间的差异。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Jan 1;206:107684. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.107684. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
4
Supportive Community Resources Are Associated with Lower Risk of Substance Use among Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Questioning Adolescents in Minnesota.支持性社区资源与明尼苏达州女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和好奇青少年的物质使用风险降低相关。
J Youth Adolesc. 2020 Apr;49(4):836-848. doi: 10.1007/s10964-019-01100-4. Epub 2019 Aug 24.
5
Explaining sexual minority young adult cigarette smoking disparities.解释性少数青年成人吸烟差异。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2019 Jun;33(4):371-381. doi: 10.1037/adb0000465. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
6
Tobacco Product Use Among Adults - United States, 2017.成年人烟草制品使用情况 - 美国,2017 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018 Nov 9;67(44):1225-1232. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6744a2.
7
Sexual and gender minority cigarette smoking disparities: An analysis of 2016 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data.性少数群体和跨性别者吸烟差异:对 2016 年行为风险因素监测系统数据的分析。
Prev Med. 2018 Aug;113:109-115. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.05.014. Epub 2018 May 12.
8
Tobacco Use and Sexual Orientation in a National Cross-sectional Study: Age, Race/Ethnicity, and Sexual Identity-Attraction Differences.一项全国性横断面研究中的烟草使用与性取向:年龄、种族/族裔以及性认同-吸引差异。
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Jun;54(6):736-745. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.03.009. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
9
Comparisons Between Smoking Patterns Among Sexual Minority Females and Males in Romantic Relationships.在恋爱关系中,性少数群体女性和男性的吸烟模式比较。
Health Educ Behav. 2019 Feb;46(1):176-184. doi: 10.1177/1090198118757821. Epub 2018 Mar 4.
10
SBM recommends policy support to reduce smoking disparities for sexual and gender minorities.SBM 建议提供政策支持,以减少性少数群体和性别少数群体在吸烟方面的差异。
Transl Behav Med. 2018 Sep 8;8(5):692-695. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibx017.