医师培训生研究协作：对英国经验的混合方法探索。
Physician trainee research collaboratives: a mixed methods exploration of UK experience.
机构信息
Marie Curie Hospice, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
出版信息
Clin Med (Lond). 2022 Mar;22(2):119-124. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2021-0511.
BACKGROUND
Physician trainee research collaboratives (TRCs) help trainees develop research skills and establish peer networks. We aimed to identify the structure, activity and views of physician TRCs in the UK.
METHODS
Representatives from physician TRCs in the UK were invited to complete an online survey and participate in a focus group.
RESULTS
Representatives from 23 physician TRCs completed the survey. There was wide variation in collaborative structure, senior input and funding resources. Seventy-four per cent of physician TRCs had published peer-reviewed articles, with 70% reporting ongoing projects at the time of the survey. The survey and focus group identified improved patient care, research and leadership skills as benefits of collaborative work; while institutional and consultant support, limited time for research, funding opportunities and restrictions on group authorship were cited as challenges to collaborative success.
CONCLUSION
Physician TRC activity continues to grow and demonstrates a dynamic approach to research for all trainees.
背景
医师培训生研究合作组织（TRC）有助于培训生发展研究技能并建立同行网络。我们旨在确定英国医师 TRC 的结构、活动和观点。
方法
邀请英国的医师 TRC 代表填写在线调查并参加焦点小组。
结果
23 名医师 TRC 的代表完成了调查。合作结构、高级别投入和资金资源存在广泛差异。74%的医师 TRC 发表了同行评议的文章，70%的人在调查时报告了正在进行的项目。调查和焦点小组确定了协作工作的益处，包括改善患者护理、研究和领导技能；而机构和顾问支持、研究时间有限、资金机会和对小组作者身份的限制则被认为是协作成功的挑战。
结论
医师 TRC 的活动继续增长，为所有培训生展示了一种充满活力的研究方法。
Zotero 插件