• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

剖腹术后使用切口边缘保护装置对手术部位感染的影响:多中心随机对照试验(ROSSINI 试验)。

Impact of wound edge protection devices on surgical site infection after laparotomy: multicentre randomised controlled trial (ROSSINI Trial).

机构信息

West Midlands Research Collaborative, Old Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

BMJ. 2013 Jul 31;347:f4305. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f4305.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.f4305
PMID:23903454
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3805488/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the clinical effectiveness of wound edge protection devices in reducing surgical site infection after abdominal surgery.

DESIGN

Multicentre observer blinded randomised controlled trial.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients undergoing laparotomy at 21 UK hospitals.

INTERVENTIONS

Standard care or the use of a wound edge protection device during surgery.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Surgical site infection within 30 days of surgery, assessed by blinded clinicians at seven and 30 days and by patient's self report for the intervening period. Secondary outcomes included quality of life, duration of stay in hospital, and the effect of characteristics of the patient and operation on the efficacy of the device.

RESULTS

760 patients were enrolled with 382 patients assigned to the device group and 378 to the control group. Six patients in the device group and five in the control group did not undergo laparotomy. Fourteen patients, seven in each group, were lost to follow-up. A total of 184 patients experienced surgical site infection within 30 days of surgery, 91/369 (24.7%) in the device group and 93/366 (25.4%) in the control group (odds ratio 0.97, 95% confidence interval 0.69 to 1.36; P=0.85). This lack of benefit was consistent across wound assessments performed by clinicians and those reported by patients and across all secondary outcomes. In the secondary analyses no subgroup could be identified in which there was evidence of clinical benefit associated with use of the device.

CONCLUSIONS

Wound edge protection devices do not reduce the rate of surgical site infection in patients undergoing laparotomy, and therefore their routine use for this role cannot be recommended.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN 40402832.

摘要

目的

评估腹壁切口保护装置在降低腹部手术后手术部位感染中的临床效果。

设计

多中心观察者盲法随机对照试验。

参与者

21 家英国医院行剖腹手术的患者。

干预措施

标准护理或在手术中使用切口边缘保护装置。

主要观察指标

术后 30 天内手术部位感染,由盲法临床医生在第 7 天和第 30 天以及患者在干预期间自行报告进行评估。次要结局指标包括生活质量、住院时间,以及患者和手术特点对装置疗效的影响。

结果

共纳入 760 例患者,其中 382 例患者被分配至装置组,378 例患者被分配至对照组。装置组 6 例患者和对照组 5 例患者未行剖腹手术。14 例患者(每组 7 例)失访。共有 184 例患者在术后 30 天内发生手术部位感染,装置组 91/369(24.7%),对照组 93/366(25.4%)(比值比 0.97,95%置信区间 0.69 至 1.36;P=0.85)。临床医生进行的伤口评估和患者报告的结果以及所有次要结局均显示,该获益并不明显。在二次分析中,没有发现任何亚组有证据表明使用该装置与临床获益相关。

结论

腹壁切口保护装置不能降低行剖腹手术患者的手术部位感染率,因此不能推荐其常规用于此类手术。

试验注册

当前对照试验 ISRCTN40402832。

相似文献

1
Impact of wound edge protection devices on surgical site infection after laparotomy: multicentre randomised controlled trial (ROSSINI Trial).剖腹术后使用切口边缘保护装置对手术部位感染的影响:多中心随机对照试验(ROSSINI 试验)。
BMJ. 2013 Jul 31;347:f4305. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f4305.
2
Reduction of surgical site infection using a novel intervention (ROSSINI): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.使用新型干预措施降低手术部位感染(ROSSINI):一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2011 Oct 4;12:217. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-217.
3
Systematic review of the clinical effectiveness of wound-edge protection devices in reducing surgical site infection in patients undergoing open abdominal surgery.系统评价腹壁切开术患者使用切口保护器减少手术部位感染的临床效果。
Ann Surg. 2012 Jun;255(6):1017-29. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31823e7411.
4
Multicenter double-blinded randomized controlled trial of standard abdominal wound edge protection with surgical dressings versus coverage with a sterile circular polyethylene drape for prevention of surgical site infections: a CHIR-Net trial (BaFO; NCT01181206).多中心、双盲、随机对照临床试验:标准腹部切口边缘保护用手术敷料与无菌圆形聚乙烯布覆盖预防手术部位感染的比较:CHIR-Net 试验(BaFO;NCT01181206)。
Ann Surg. 2014 Nov;260(5):730-7; discussion 737-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000954.
5
Negative-pressure wound therapy compared with standard dressings following surgical treatment of major trauma to the lower limb: the WHiST RCT.负压伤口疗法与标准敷料在下肢重大创伤手术后的比较:WHiST RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Aug;24(38):1-86. doi: 10.3310/hta24380.
6
Use of plastic adhesive drapes during surgery for preventing surgical site infection.手术期间使用塑料粘贴手术巾预防手术部位感染。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 22;2015(4):CD006353. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006353.pub4.
7
Three wound-dressing strategies to reduce surgical site infection after abdominal surgery: the Bluebelle feasibility study and pilot RCT.三种减少腹部手术后手术部位感染的伤口处理策略:Bluebelle 可行性研究和初步 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Aug;23(39):1-166. doi: 10.3310/hta23390.
8
Negative Pressure Dressings to Prevent Surgical Site Infection After Emergency Laparotomy: The SUNRRISE Randomized Clinical Trial.负压敷料预防急诊剖腹术后手术部位感染:SUNRRISE随机临床试验
JAMA. 2025 Mar 11;333(10):853-863. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.24764.
9
The cost-effectiveness of wound-edge protection devices compared to standard care in reducing surgical site infection after laparotomy: an economic evaluation alongside the ROSSINI trial.与标准护理相比,伤口边缘保护装置在降低剖腹手术后手术部位感染方面的成本效益:一项与ROSSINI试验同步进行的经济学评估。
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 18;9(4):e95595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095595. eCollection 2014.
10
Use of plastic adhesive drapes during surgery for preventing surgical site infection.手术期间使用塑料粘贴手术巾预防手术部位感染。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jan 31(1):CD006353. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006353.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
The burden of surgical site infection and associated factors among patients admitted to the surgical ward in resource-limited countries: an institutional-based cross-sectional study.资源有限国家外科病房住院患者手术部位感染负担及相关因素:一项基于机构的横断面研究。
Front Surg. 2025 Aug 28;12:1571033. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1571033. eCollection 2025.
2
THE BURDEN OF POST-CAESAREAN SECTION WOUND COMPLICATIONS IN A TEACHING HOSPITAL IN SOUTHEAST NIGERIA.尼日利亚东南部一家教学医院剖宫产术后伤口并发症的负担
Ann Ib Postgrad Med. 2025 Mar 31;23(1):99-110.
3
Comparison of Paramedian Versus Midline Extraction Sites in Elective Laparoscopic Right Colectomy: A Propensity-Matched Study of Postoperative Ventral Hernia Development.

本文引用的文献

1
Wound protectors reduce surgical site infection: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.伤口保护器可降低手术部位感染:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Ann Surg. 2012 Jul;256(1):53-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182570372.
2
ALEXIS O-Ring wound retractor vs conventional wound protection for the prevention of surgical site infections in colorectal resections(1).ALEXIS 环形手术切口牵开器与常规切口保护器预防结直肠切除术中手术部位感染的比较(1)。
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Jun;14(6):e346-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.02943.x.
3
Does a well-done analysis of poor-quality data constitute evidence of benefit?
选择性腹腔镜右半结肠切除术中旁正中与正中切口提取部位的比较:术后腹疝发生的倾向匹配研究
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 22;14(15):5198. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155198.
4
Clinical evaluation of adults undergoing elective surgery utilizing intraoperative incisional wound irrigation (CLEAN Wound): protocol for a randomised controlled trial.采用术中切口冲洗对择期手术成年患者进行的临床评估(清洁伤口):一项随机对照试验方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 17;15(7):e104375. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104375.
5
Environmental and financial cost of surgical-site infection by severity after lower limb vascular surgery.下肢血管手术后手术部位感染按严重程度划分的环境和经济成本
BJS Open. 2025 May 7;9(3). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraf015.
6
ASSIST: Development of a Simplified Clinician-Patient Hybrid Reporting Outcome Measure for Remote Diagnosis of Surgical Site Infection.辅助:开发一种用于手术部位感染远程诊断的简化临床医生-患者混合报告结局测量方法。
Int Wound J. 2025 Apr;22(4):e70234. doi: 10.1111/iwj.70234.
7
[Prevention and treatment of surgical site infections in abdominal surgery].腹部手术中手术部位感染的预防与治疗
Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2025 Apr;96(4):347-360. doi: 10.1007/s00104-025-02242-x. Epub 2025 Mar 6.
8
Role of wound protectors in preventing surgical site infection in patients undergoing abdominal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.伤口保护器在预防腹部手术患者手术部位感染中的作用:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
BMC Surg. 2025 Feb 18;25(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02809-9.
9
Negative Pressure Dressings to Prevent Surgical Site Infection After Emergency Laparotomy: The SUNRRISE Randomized Clinical Trial.负压敷料预防急诊剖腹术后手术部位感染:SUNRRISE随机临床试验
JAMA. 2025 Mar 11;333(10):853-863. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.24764.
10
Can machine learning models improve the prediction of surgical site infection in abdominal surgery than traditional statistical models?机器学习模型是否比传统统计模型更能提高腹部手术部位感染的预测效果?
J Int Med Res. 2024 Nov;52(11):3000605241293696. doi: 10.1177/03000605241293696.
对质量欠佳的数据进行的详尽分析能构成获益的证据吗?
Ann Surg. 2012 Jun;255(6):1030-1. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182574dd3.
4
Systematic review of the clinical effectiveness of wound-edge protection devices in reducing surgical site infection in patients undergoing open abdominal surgery.系统评价腹壁切开术患者使用切口保护器减少手术部位感染的临床效果。
Ann Surg. 2012 Jun;255(6):1017-29. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31823e7411.
5
Reduction of surgical site infection using a novel intervention (ROSSINI): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.使用新型干预措施降低手术部位感染(ROSSINI):一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2011 Oct 4;12:217. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-217.
6
Surgical site infection in elective operations for colorectal cancer after the application of preventive measures.应用预防措施后结直肠癌择期手术中的手术部位感染
Arch Surg. 2011 May;146(5):606-12. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.90.
7
A prospective randomized study for evaluation of wound retractors in the prevention of incision site infections after cesarean section.一项评估伤口牵开器预防剖宫产术后切口部位感染的前瞻性随机研究。
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2011;38(1):57-9.
8
A wound protector shields incision sites from bacterial invasion.伤口保护器可防止切口部位受到细菌侵袭。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2010 Dec;11(6):501-3. doi: 10.1089/sur.2009.072. Epub 2010 Sep 17.
9
Barrier wound protection decreases surgical site infection in open elective colorectal surgery: a randomized clinical trial.屏障伤口保护可降低择期开放结直肠手术的手术部位感染:一项随机临床试验。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2010 Oct;53(10):1374-80. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181ed3f7e.
10
Post-discharge surveillance to identify colorectal surgical site infection rates and related costs.出院后监测以确定结直肠手术部位感染率及相关费用。
J Hosp Infect. 2009 Jul;72(3):243-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2009.03.021. Epub 2009 May 15.