Suppr超能文献

扫视运动增强斯特鲁普和西蒙冲突控制。

Making a saccade enhances Stroop and Simon conflict control.

机构信息

Shanghai Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Psychological Crisis Intervention, School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, 200062, China.

Beijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health, School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.

出版信息

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Apr;84(3):795-814. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02458-7. Epub 2022 Mar 18.

Abstract

Cognitive control is an important ability instantiated in many situations such as conflict control (e.g., Stroop/Simon task) and the control of eye movements (e.g., saccades). However, it is unclear whether eye movement control shares a common cognitive control system with the conflict control. In Experiment 1, we asked participants to make a prosaccade or antisaccade and then to identify the color of a lateralized color word (i.e., a Stroop-Simon stimulus). The stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) between the saccadic cue and the Stroop-Simon stimulus was manipulated to be either short (200 ms) or long (600 ms). Results showed that the Stroop effect at the response level and the (negative) Simon effect were smaller when the SOA was short than long, demonstrating a decline of response control over time after making a saccade. Moreover, this temporal change of the Simon effect was more pronounced in the antisaccade session than in the prosaccade session. Furthermore, individuals who had better performance in the antisaccade task performed better in the response control of Stroop interference. When the saccade task was removed in Experiment 2, the temporal declines of the response control observed in Experiment 1 were absent. Experiment 3 replicated the key results of Experiment 1 by replacing the Stroop-Simon task with a typical Simon task and separately testing the typical Stroop and Simon tasks. Overall, our findings suggest that a common system is shared between the control of eye movements and the conflict control at the response level.

摘要

认知控制是一种在许多情况下体现出来的重要能力,例如冲突控制(例如,Stroop/Simon 任务)和眼球运动控制(例如,眼跳)。然而,眼球运动控制是否与冲突控制共享一个共同的认知控制系统尚不清楚。在实验 1 中,我们要求参与者进行正眼跳或反眼跳,然后识别侧向化颜色词的颜色(即 Stroop-Simon 刺激)。眼跳线索和 Stroop-Simon 刺激之间的刺激呈现时间间隔(SOA)被操纵为短(200 毫秒)或长(600 毫秒)。结果表明,当 SOA 较短时,反应水平上的 Stroop 效应和(负)Simon 效应较小,表明在进行眼跳后,反应控制随时间的推移而下降。此外,这种 Simon 效应的时间变化在反眼跳阶段比在正眼跳阶段更为明显。此外,在反眼跳任务中表现更好的个体在 Stroop 干扰的反应控制中表现更好。当实验 2 中去除眼跳任务时,实验 1 中观察到的反应控制的时间下降就不存在了。实验 3 通过用典型的 Simon 任务替代 Stroop-Simon 任务,并分别测试典型的 Stroop 和 Simon 任务,复制了实验 1 的关键结果。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,在反应水平上,眼球运动控制和冲突控制共享一个共同的系统。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验