• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

奖励在 Simon 任务中的影响:与 Stroop 和 Eriksen 侧翼任务的差异和相似之处。

The influence of reward in the Simon task: Differences and similarities to the Stroop and Eriksen flanker tasks.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Tübingen, Schleichstraße 4, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.

出版信息

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Apr;85(3):949-959. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02563-7. Epub 2022 Oct 31.

DOI:10.3758/s13414-022-02563-7
PMID:36316615
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10066131/
Abstract

Previous studies have suggested that performance-contingent reward can modulate cognitive control by biasing irrelevant location-response associations in the Simon task. However, the influence of reward in the case of irrelevant words (Stroop task) or irrelevant flankers (Eriksen Flanker task) remains unclear. Across two preregistered experiments, the present study investigated the influence of reward on conflict processing with different types of distractors. Conflict effects on mean reaction time (RT) were reduced in the Simon task (Experiments 1 and 2) when incongruent versus congruent trials were rewarded, and this modulating effect of reward on conflict processing was also observed in the Eriksen flanker task (Experiment 2), but not in the Stroop task (Experiment 1). We propose that cognitive control adjustments to distractor-specific reward contingencies can be generalized across distractor types producing both perceptual-related (Flanker task) and motor-related (Simon task) conflict, but, if any, to a limited degree when distractors produce additional higher-level task conflict (Stroop task). In addition, distributional RT analyses (delta plots) revealed that rewarded distractor-response associations modulate cognitive control not only via biasing the strength (Simon and Eriksen tasks) but also the time-course of suppressing distractor processing (Eriksen task). Overall, the present study dissociated distractor-general and distractor-specific effects of reward on cognitive control.

摘要

先前的研究表明,绩效相关的奖励可以通过在西蒙任务中偏向无关的位置-反应关联来调节认知控制。然而,在无关单词(Stroop 任务)或无关侧翼(Eriksen 侧翼任务)的情况下,奖励的影响尚不清楚。在两项预先注册的实验中,本研究调查了不同类型分心物的奖励对冲突处理的影响。当不一致与一致的试验得到奖励时,Simon 任务中的冲突对平均反应时间(RT)的影响会降低(实验 1 和 2),奖励对冲突处理的这种调节作用也在 Eriksen 侧翼任务(实验 2)中观察到,但在 Stroop 任务(实验 1)中未观察到。我们提出,对分心物特定奖励结果的认知控制调整可以推广到不同的分心物类型,从而产生与知觉相关(Flanker 任务)和运动相关(Simon 任务)的冲突,但如果有的话,当分心物产生额外的更高层次的任务冲突(Stroop 任务)时,这种调整程度是有限的。此外,分布 RT 分析(delta 图)表明,奖励的分心物-反应关联不仅通过偏向于干扰处理的强度(Simon 和 Eriksen 任务),而且通过偏向于干扰处理的时间进程(Eriksen 任务)来调节认知控制。总体而言,本研究区分了奖励对认知控制的分心物一般效应和分心物特定效应。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cec7/10066131/a09d72a55296/13414_2022_2563_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cec7/10066131/869744bdc1bd/13414_2022_2563_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cec7/10066131/1a9d31609b8e/13414_2022_2563_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cec7/10066131/a09d72a55296/13414_2022_2563_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cec7/10066131/869744bdc1bd/13414_2022_2563_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cec7/10066131/1a9d31609b8e/13414_2022_2563_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cec7/10066131/a09d72a55296/13414_2022_2563_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The influence of reward in the Simon task: Differences and similarities to the Stroop and Eriksen flanker tasks.奖励在 Simon 任务中的影响:与 Stroop 和 Eriksen 侧翼任务的差异和相似之处。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Apr;85(3):949-959. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02563-7. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
2
Proactive reward in conflict tasks: Does it only enhance general performance or also modulate conflict effects?冲突任务中的主动奖励:它是否仅增强一般表现,还是也调节冲突效应?
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Aug;86(6):2153-2168. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02896-5. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
3
The role of temporal order of relevant and irrelevant dimensions within conflict tasks.冲突任务中相关和不相关维度的时间顺序的作用。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2022 Oct;48(10):1099-1115. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001032. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
4
The impact of distractor relevance on the strength and timing of cognitive control: Evidence from delta plots and diffusion model analyses.分心物相关性对认知控制的强度和时机的影响:来自δ图和扩散模型分析的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2023 Oct;49(10):1588-1614. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001281. Epub 2023 Aug 10.
5
The role of task-relevant and task-irrelevant information in congruency sequence effects: Applying the diffusion model for conflict tasks.任务相关信息和任务无关信息在一致性序列效应中的作用:将扩散模型应用于冲突任务
Cogn Psychol. 2023 Feb;140:101528. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2022.101528. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
6
Effects of conflict trial proportion: A comparison of the Eriksen and Simon tasks.冲突试验比例的影响:艾瑞克森和西蒙任务的比较。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 Feb;83(2):810-836. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02164-2. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
7
A revised diffusion model for conflict tasks.用于冲突任务的修正扩散模型。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Feb;31(1):1-31. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02288-0. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
8
Exploring behavioral adjustments of proportion congruency manipulations in an Eriksen flanker task with visual and auditory distractor modalities.探讨视觉和听觉干扰模态下,Eriksen 侧抑制任务中比例一致性操纵的行为调整。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Jan;52(1):91-114. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01447-x. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
9
Attentional control adjustments in Eriksen and Stroop task performance can be independent of response conflict.在埃里克森任务和斯特鲁普任务表现中,注意力控制调整可以独立于反应冲突。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011 Jun;64(6):1056-81. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2010.523792. Epub 2010 Nov 28.
10
Conflict resolution in the Eriksen flanker task: Similarities and differences to the Simon task.埃里克森侧翼任务中的冲突解决:与西蒙任务的相似与不同。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 28;14(3):e0214203. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214203. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Reinforcement learning of adaptive control strategies.自适应控制策略的强化学习
Commun Psychol. 2024 Jan 12;2(1):8. doi: 10.1038/s44271-024-00055-y.
2
Proactive reward in conflict tasks: Does it only enhance general performance or also modulate conflict effects?冲突任务中的主动奖励:它是否仅增强一般表现,还是也调节冲突效应?
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Aug;86(6):2153-2168. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02896-5. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
3
A Diffusion Model Analysis of Object-Based Selective Attention in the Eriksen Flanker Task.基于对象的选择性注意在埃里森干扰任务中的扩散模型分析。

本文引用的文献

1
Selective reinforcement of conflict processing in the Stroop task.斯特鲁普任务中冲突处理的选择性强化。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 30;16(7):e0255430. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255430. eCollection 2021.
2
Multiplicative priming of the correct response can explain the interaction between Simon and flanker congruency.正确反应的乘法启动可以解释 Simon 效应和侧翼一致性之间的相互作用。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 9;16(3):e0248172. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248172. eCollection 2021.
3
Reward does not modulate corticospinal excitability in anticipation of a Stroop trial.
Exp Psychol. 2023 May;70(3):155-170. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000588.
4
Exploring behavioral adjustments of proportion congruency manipulations in an Eriksen flanker task with visual and auditory distractor modalities.探讨视觉和听觉干扰模态下,Eriksen 侧抑制任务中比例一致性操纵的行为调整。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Jan;52(1):91-114. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01447-x. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
5
Motor demands influence conflict processing in a mouse-tracking Simon task.运动需求影响鼠标追踪 Simon 任务中的冲突处理。
Psychol Res. 2023 Sep;87(6):1768-1783. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01755-y. Epub 2022 Nov 20.
奖励并不调节预期 Stroop 试验时的皮质脊髓兴奋性。
Eur J Neurosci. 2021 Feb;53(4):1019-1028. doi: 10.1111/ejn.15052. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
4
Beyond mean reaction times: Combining distributional analyses with processing stage manipulations in the Simon task.超越平均反应时间:在西蒙任务中将分布分析与加工阶段操作相结合。
Cogn Psychol. 2020 Jun;119:101275. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2020.101275. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
5
Simon Says-On the influence of stimulus arrangement, stimulus material and inner speech habits on the Simon effect.西蒙说——关于刺激安排、刺激材料和内部言语习惯对西蒙效应的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020 Jul;46(7):1349-1363. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000789. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
6
Shared mechanisms underlying the location-, word- and arrow-based Simon effects.位置、词汇和箭头西蒙效应的共同机制。
Psychol Res. 2020 Sep;84(6):1655-1667. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01175-5. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
7
Conflict resolution in the Eriksen flanker task: Similarities and differences to the Simon task.埃里克森侧翼任务中的冲突解决:与西蒙任务的相似与不同。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 28;14(3):e0214203. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214203. eCollection 2019.
8
Getting a grip on cognitive flexibility.掌握认知灵活性。
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2018 Dec;27(6):470-476. doi: 10.1177/0963721418787475. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
9
Neural Dynamics of Reward-Induced Response Activation and Inhibition.奖励诱导反应激活和抑制的神经动力学。
Cereb Cortex. 2019 Aug 14;29(9):3961-3976. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhy275.
10
Combining speed and accuracy to control for speed-accuracy trade-offs(?).兼顾速度和准确性,以控制速度-准确性权衡(?)。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Feb;51(1):40-60. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1076-x.