Karakas Cemal, Hajiyev Yusif, Skrehot Henry C, Kralik Stephen F, Lambert Elton M, Pehlivan Davut
Division of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Neurology, University of Louisville, Norton Children's Medical Group, Louisville, Kentucky.
Department of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Pediatr Neurol. 2022 May;130:28-40. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2022.02.006. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
Pediatric cavernous sinus thrombosis (CST) is a rare condition with limited data regarding its clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes. The objective of this study was to describe the clinical and radiologic features, diagnostic evaluation, management, and long-term prognosis and to identify clinical variables associated with long-term outcomes in pediatric CST.
A retrospective chart review of patients younger than 18 years diagnosed with a CST between 2004 and 2018 at a single center was conducted.
We identified 16 (M:F = 10:6) children with CST with a mean age of 7.6 years (10 days to 15 years) and average follow-up duration of 29 months (3 weeks to 144 months). The most common symptom and examination finding at presentation was eyelid swelling (n = 8). Six patients had bilateral CST. The most common etiologies were sinusitis (n = 5) and orbital cellulitis (n = 5). Treatments included antibiotics (n = 14), anticoagulation (n = 11), and surgery (n = 5). Only one patient died due to intracranial complications. Twelve patients had a normal examination at follow-up. None of the clinical variables including age (P = 0.14), gender (P = 0.09), use of antibiotics (P = 1.00) or anticoagulation (P = 1.00), surgery (P = 0.28), parenchymal abnormalities (P = 0.30), additional cerebral venous thrombosis (P = 0.28), and early versus late commencing of anticoagulation (P = 1.00) were significant when comparing patients with full/partial resolution versus those with no resolution of thrombosis on follow-up neuroimaging.
Our study is one of the largest cohorts with the longest follow-up data for the pediatric CST. Most of our patients had favorable outcomes at follow-up. We found no statistical difference between clinical variables when comparing patients with full/partial resolution versus those with no resolution of thrombosis on follow-up neuroimaging.