University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2022 Jun;40(1):40-61. doi: 10.1007/s40592-022-00155-7. Epub 2022 Mar 20.
Lockdowns in Australia have been strict and lengthy. Policy-makers appear to have given the preservation of quantity of lives strong priority over the preservation of quality of lives. But thought-experiments in population ethics suggest that this is not always the right priority. In this paper, I'll discuss both negative impacts on quantity of lives caused by the lockdowns themselves, including an increase in domestic violence, and negative impacts on quality of lives caused by lockdowns, in order to raise the question of whether we each had reason to choose quantity over quality in our own lives in a way that would justify the lockdowns we had.
澳大利亚的封锁措施非常严格且持续时间长。政策制定者似乎优先考虑保护生命数量,而不是生命质量。但是人口伦理思想实验表明,这并不总是正确的优先事项。在本文中,我将讨论封锁措施本身对生命数量产生的负面影响,包括家庭暴力的增加,以及封锁措施对生活质量产生的负面影响,以提出一个问题,即在我们自己的生活中,我们是否有理由选择数量而不是质量,从而证明我们所采取的封锁措施是合理的。