Suppr超能文献

封控生活值得过吗?

Was lockdown life worth living?

机构信息

University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Monash Bioeth Rev. 2022 Jun;40(1):40-61. doi: 10.1007/s40592-022-00155-7. Epub 2022 Mar 20.

Abstract

Lockdowns in Australia have been strict and lengthy. Policy-makers appear to have given the preservation of quantity of lives strong priority over the preservation of quality of lives. But thought-experiments in population ethics suggest that this is not always the right priority. In this paper, I'll discuss both negative impacts on quantity of lives caused by the lockdowns themselves, including an increase in domestic violence, and negative impacts on quality of lives caused by lockdowns, in order to raise the question of whether we each had reason to choose quantity over quality in our own lives in a way that would justify the lockdowns we had.

摘要

澳大利亚的封锁措施非常严格且持续时间长。政策制定者似乎优先考虑保护生命数量,而不是生命质量。但是人口伦理思想实验表明,这并不总是正确的优先事项。在本文中,我将讨论封锁措施本身对生命数量产生的负面影响,包括家庭暴力的增加,以及封锁措施对生活质量产生的负面影响,以提出一个问题,即在我们自己的生活中,我们是否有理由选择数量而不是质量,从而证明我们所采取的封锁措施是合理的。

相似文献

1
Was lockdown life worth living?封控生活值得过吗?
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2022 Jun;40(1):40-61. doi: 10.1007/s40592-022-00155-7. Epub 2022 Mar 20.
9
The perpetrators of domestic violence.家庭暴力的实施者。
Med J Aust. 2000 Nov 6;173(9):484-8. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2000.tb139302.x.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验