Department of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, 1 Youyi Rd, Yuzhong Qu, Chongqing, 400016, People's Republic of China.
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Mar 20;22(1):269. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06964-1.
To investigate the difference in the severity of illness, organ dysfunction, and prognosis of acute cholangitis due to different pathogenic bacterial infection types.
A retrospective observational study was performed. Patients who met the selection criteria according to blood culture and bile culture results of different pathogenic bacterial were divided into groups. The severity of illness, organ dysfunction, and prognosis of the groups were analyzed and compared comprehensively.
A total of 424 patients were included, and no bacterial growth developed in 111 patients (26.2%). Among the 313 patients (73.8%) with bacterial growth, 155 patients had only Gram-negative bacteria cultured (49.5%), 48 patients had only Gram-positive bacteria cultured (15.3%), and 110 patients had both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria cultured (35.1%). The proportion of Grade III patients and the APACHE II and SOFA scores of the mixed Gram-negative and positive group were the highest (p < 0.05); the intensive care unit admission day and hospital stay were longer, and the mortality rate were also higher 20/110 (18.2%) than the other two groups. Regression analysis showed that bacterial growth was an independent risk factor for organ dysfunction. The risks of an increased septic shock, neurological dysfunction, hepatic dysfunction, hematological dysfunction, and respiratory dysfunction in the mixed Gram-negative and positive group were higher than the Gram-negative group (P < 0.05). The Cox proportional hazards regression prompt showed that different culture results were independent risk factors for death. The mixed Gram-negative and positive group had increased hazard ratios and 95% CI of 7.30 (95% CI 1.55 to 34.38) compared with the Gram-negative group. There was no difference between the Gram-negative group and the Gram-positive group in the severity of illness, organ dysfunction, intensive care unit admission day, hospital stay, mortality rate, and risk of death (P > 0.05).
In acute cholangitis, mixed infection with Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria was more severe and was associated with a higher risk of death. There were no apparent differences between Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacterial infections.
研究不同致病细菌感染类型的急性胆管炎的疾病严重程度、器官功能障碍和预后的差异。
进行回顾性观察性研究。根据不同致病细菌的血培养和胆汁培养结果,符合选择标准的患者被分为不同的组。综合分析和比较各组的疾病严重程度、器官功能障碍和预后。
共纳入 424 例患者,111 例(26.2%)无细菌生长。在 313 例(73.8%)有细菌生长的患者中,155 例仅培养出革兰氏阴性菌(49.5%),48 例仅培养出革兰氏阳性菌(15.3%),110 例同时培养出革兰氏阴性菌和革兰氏阳性菌(35.1%)。混合革兰氏阴性和阳性组的 III 级患者比例和 APACHE II 和 SOFA 评分最高(p<0.05);重症监护病房入院日和住院时间较长,死亡率也较高 20/110(18.2%)高于其他两组。回归分析表明,细菌生长是器官功能障碍的独立危险因素。混合革兰氏阴性和阳性组发生脓毒症休克、神经功能障碍、肝功能障碍、血液功能障碍和呼吸功能障碍的风险高于革兰氏阴性组(P<0.05)。Cox 比例风险回归提示不同培养结果是死亡的独立危险因素。与革兰氏阴性组相比,混合革兰氏阴性和阳性组的危险比和 95%CI 分别增加 7.30(95%CI 1.55 至 34.38)。革兰氏阴性组与革兰氏阳性组在疾病严重程度、器官功能障碍、重症监护病房入院日、住院时间、死亡率和死亡风险方面无差异(P>0.05)。
在急性胆管炎中,革兰氏阴性和革兰氏阳性混合感染更严重,与死亡风险增加相关。革兰氏阴性和革兰氏阳性细菌感染之间没有明显差异。