Stanic Milana, Dragic Sasa, Travar Maja, Uletilovic Snezana, Mandic-Kovacevic Nebojsa, Kovacevic Pedja
Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Clinical Centre of the Republic of Srpska and Medical Faculty University of Banja Luka, Banja Luka, BIH.
Medical Intensive Care Unit, University Clinical Centre of the Republic of Srpska and Medical Faculty University of Banja Luka, Banja Luka, BIH.
Cureus. 2024 Nov 11;16(11):e73456. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73456. eCollection 2024 Nov.
Oxidative stress represents an imbalance between oxidants and antioxidants, with a predominance of oxidants leading to cellular and tissue damage. Given the limited number of studies showing the predictive value of oxidative stress factors regarding sepsis type, the objectives of this study emerged as follows: to determine whether pro-oxidant and antioxidant values could predictively differentiate between Gram-positive (GP) and Gram-negative (GN) sepsis. Additionally, the study sought to assess whether bacterial type impacts treatment outcomes in sepsis patients. This prospective, observational cohort longitudinal study included 87 patients diagnosed with sepsis according to the Third International Consensus on Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3) criteria. Following the sepsis diagnosis, blood, urine, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), and swabs/punctures were sampled and microbiologically analyzed. Sampling was repeated 24 hours after the first collection. Based on the microbiological results, four groups of subjects were formed: the GP group included septic patients in whom one or more GP bacteria were isolated by microbiological analysis; the GN group included septic patients in whom one or more GN bacteria were isolated; the GP/GN group included septic patients with both GP and GN bacteria isolated; and the negative culture (NC) group included septic patients in whom no pathogenic microorganisms were detected by microbiological analysis. Additionally, after sepsis diagnosis, oxidative stress markers, i.e., thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), nitrite ion radical (NO₂⁻), hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂), superoxide ion radical (O₂⁻), and antioxidants: superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and reduced glutathione (GSH) were determined from blood samples. Blood sampling was repeated 24 hours after the first collection. On comparing pro-oxidant values relative to the type of infection in septic patients, measured on the first and second days, no statistically significant differences were observed for the analyzed parameters, except for delta (Δ) O₂⁻. A statistically significant increase was noted in the GN group of septic patients (p = 0.02). On comparing antioxidant values relative to infection type in septic patients, measured on the first and second days, no statistically significant differences were found for the analyzed parameters. Based on the measured values of pro-oxidants and antioxidants in this study, it is evident that they do not have predictive significance for the final treatment outcome and the type of sepsis-causing pathogen. These results underscore the need for further research on the predictive role of oxidative stress in sepsis.
氧化应激代表氧化剂和抗氧化剂之间的失衡,当氧化剂占优势时会导致细胞和组织损伤。鉴于显示氧化应激因素对脓毒症类型具有预测价值的研究数量有限,本研究的目标如下:确定促氧化剂和抗氧化剂值是否能够预测区分革兰氏阳性(GP)和革兰氏阴性(GN)脓毒症。此外,该研究旨在评估细菌类型是否会影响脓毒症患者的治疗结果。这项前瞻性、观察性队列纵向研究纳入了87例根据《脓毒症和脓毒性休克第三次国际共识》(Sepsis-3)标准诊断为脓毒症的患者。在脓毒症诊断后,采集血液、尿液、支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)样本以及拭子/穿刺样本,并进行微生物学分析。在首次采集后24小时重复采样。根据微生物学结果,形成了四组受试者:GP组包括通过微生物学分析分离出一种或多种GP细菌的脓毒症患者;GN组包括分离出一种或多种GN细菌的脓毒症患者;GP/GN组包括同时分离出GP和GN细菌的脓毒症患者;阴性培养(NC)组包括通过微生物学分析未检测到致病微生物的脓毒症患者。此外,在脓毒症诊断后,从血液样本中测定氧化应激标志物,即硫代巴比妥酸反应性物质(TBARS)、亚硝酸根离子自由基(NO₂⁻)、过氧化氢(H₂O₂)、超氧离子自由基(O₂⁻),以及抗氧化剂:超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)、过氧化氢酶(CAT)和还原型谷胱甘肽(GSH)。在首次采集后24小时重复采血。在比较脓毒症患者第一天和第二天测量的相对于感染类型的促氧化剂值时,除了δ(Δ)O₂⁻外,分析的参数未观察到统计学上的显著差异。脓毒症患者的GN组中观察到统计学上的显著增加(p = 0.02)。在比较脓毒症患者第一天和第二天测量的相对于感染类型的抗氧化剂值时,分析的参数未发现统计学上的显著差异。基于本研究中促氧化剂和抗氧化剂的测量值,很明显它们对最终治疗结果和引起脓毒症的病原体类型没有预测意义。这些结果强调了对氧化应激在脓毒症中的预测作用进行进一步研究的必要性。