Analysis Group, Inc., 111 Huntington Avenue, Fourteenth Floor, Boston, MA, 02199, USA.
Department of Pediatrics, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Adv Ther. 2022 May;39(5):1915-1958. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02089-2. Epub 2022 Mar 20.
The recent advent of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) has dramatically changed the treatment landscape of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), and the multifaceted impact of this advancement has not been assessed thoroughly in the growing body of literature. We sought to summarize the literature on the natural history of SMA and the impact of SMA DMTs, including health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and utilities, clinical efficacy and safety, and economic impact.
Systematic literature reviews were conducted following PRISMA guidelines with no inclusive dates. Relevant studies were identified by searching full-text databases on November 12-13, 2020, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and EconLit, conference proceedings, health technology assessment databases, and clinical trial registries. All searches used a combination of MeSH and key terms. Studies were screened according to criteria based upon population, intervention, outcomes, and study design structure.
Findings from 17, 23, 32, and 42 studies were included for the evaluation of natural history of SMA, HRQOL and utilities, clinical efficacy and safety, and economic impact of DMTs, respectively. Currently available data indicate that untreated SMA is associated with considerable humanistic and economic burden, with estimates of costs varying by treatment. While a variety of interventions have been evaluated in SMA clinical trials, quantitative synthesis of safety and efficacy findings was not feasible because of inconsistencies in reported outcomes. Data assessing impacts of DMTs on HRQOL were also lacking.
Overall, this systematic literature review highlights a clear need for up-to-date and methodologically rigorous clinical, HRQOL, and economic data to support unbiased assessments of the relative clinical and economic effectiveness of SMA treatments. More research is required to extend our understanding of the burden of SMA on HRQOL utility assessments and the impact of new DMTs on HRQOL and utilities for patients with SMA.
疾病修饰疗法(DMTs)的出现极大地改变了脊髓性肌萎缩症(SMA)的治疗格局,而这一进展在不断增长的文献中尚未得到全面评估。我们旨在总结 SMA 的自然史以及 SMA DMTs 的影响的文献,包括健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)和效用、临床疗效和安全性以及经济影响。
按照 PRISMA 指南进行系统文献回顾,不包括包容性日期。于 2020 年 11 月 12 日至 13 日通过搜索全文数据库,包括 MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane 中央对照试验注册库和 EconLit、会议记录、卫生技术评估数据库和临床试验注册库,确定相关研究。所有搜索均使用 MeSH 和关键词的组合。根据人群、干预措施、结局和研究设计结构的标准筛选研究。
分别评估 SMA 自然史、HRQOL 和效用、DMTs 的临床疗效和安全性以及经济影响的 17、23、32 和 42 项研究的结果被纳入。目前的数据表明,未经治疗的 SMA 与巨大的人文和经济负担相关,治疗费用估计因治疗而异。虽然在 SMA 临床试验中评估了多种干预措施,但由于报告结果不一致,无法对安全性和疗效的发现进行定量综合。也缺乏评估 DMTs 对 HRQOL 影响的数据。
总体而言,这项系统文献综述强调需要最新的、方法严谨的临床、HRQOL 和经济数据,以支持对 SMA 治疗的相对临床和经济有效性进行无偏见的评估。需要更多的研究来扩展我们对 SMA 对 HRQOL 效用评估的负担以及新的 DMTs 对 SMA 患者 HRQOL 和效用的影响的理解。