Suppr超能文献

[走向新的时间秩序?疫情之后的时间性、资本主义与国家的关系 迈向新的时间秩序?论疫情背景下时间性、资本主义与国家的关系]

[Towards a new order of time? The relation of temporality, capitalism and the state in the wake of the pandemicVers un nouvel ordre temporel ? Sur le rapport entre temporalité, capitalisme et État sous le signe de la pandémie].

作者信息

Suckert Lisa

机构信息

Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung, Paulstraße 3, 50676 Köln, Deutschland.

出版信息

Berl J Soziol. 2022;32(1):123-152. doi: 10.1007/s11609-022-00466-w. Epub 2022 Mar 15.

Abstract

Does the corona pandemic allow for a departure from the capitalist time regime? Can the crisis induce a more sustainable order of time? This article looks at the COVID-19 pandemic and the state interventions in response to it from the perspective of sociology of time and economic sociology. It shows that the social and economic disruptions attributed to the pandemic can be understood as the result of a collision of opposing temporal logics. In order to fight the pandemic, the state initially enforced ways of dealing with time that contradict the capitalist time regime and its major principles-commodification and rational use of time, acceleration, as well as appropriation of the future. However, and contrary to what e.g. Hartmut Rosa hopes, this "return of the state" as a time-political ordering power does not yet imply a path change towards a "new order of time" that lasts beyond the current state of emergency. The article shows that especially those state interventions that go beyond mere pandemic control can often be understood as attempts to mediate between different temporal logics. While they cushion the collision of opposing temporal logics, they are essentially intended to facilitate a "return" to the capitalist time regime. In doing so, they perpetuate time-related inequalities.

摘要

新冠疫情是否允许背离资本主义时间制度?这场危机能否引发一种更具可持续性的时间秩序?本文从时间社会学和经济社会学的视角审视了新冠疫情以及国家针对疫情所采取的干预措施。研究表明,归因于疫情的社会和经济混乱可被理解为相互对立的时间逻辑碰撞的结果。为抗击疫情,国家最初强制推行了一些与资本主义时间制度及其主要原则——时间的商品化与合理利用、加速以及对未来的占有——相矛盾的时间处理方式。然而,与例如哈特穆特·罗萨所期望的相反,作为一种时间政治秩序力量的这种“国家的回归”尚不意味着朝着超越当前紧急状态而持续存在的“新时间秩序”的路径转变。本文表明,尤其是那些超越单纯疫情管控的国家干预措施,往往可被理解为在不同时间逻辑之间进行调解的尝试。虽然它们缓和了相互对立的时间逻辑的碰撞,但本质上旨在促成向资本主义时间制度的“回归”。在此过程中,它们使与时间相关的不平等永久化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f10c/8923097/3f5db5949342/11609_2022_466_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验