Suppr超能文献

新冠疫情期间发热管理不当的潜在风险:可能原因与影响

Potential for Further Mismanagement of Fever During COVID-19 Pandemic: Possible Causes and Impacts.

作者信息

Singh Samer, Kishore Dhiraj, Singh Rakesh K

机构信息

Centre of Experimental Medicine and Surgery, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.

Department of General Medicine, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Mar 2;9:751929. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.751929. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Fever remains an integral part of acute infectious diseases management, especially for those without effective therapeutics, but the widespread myths about "fevers" and the presence of confusing guidelines from different agencies, which have heightened during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and are open to alternate interpretation, could deny whole populations the benefits of fever. Guidelines suggesting antipyresis for 37.8-39°C fever are concerning as 39°C boosts the protective heat-shock and immune response (humoral, cell-mediated, and nutritional) whereas ≥40°C initiates/enhances the antiviral responses and restricts high-temperature adapted pathogens, e.g., severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), strains of influenza, and measles. Urgent attention is accordingly needed to address the situation because of the potential public health consequences of the existence of conflicting guidelines in the public domain. We have in this article attempted to restate the benefits of fever in disease resolution, dispel myths, and underline the need for alignment of national treatment guidelines with that of the WHO, to promote appropriate practices and reduce the morbidity and mortality from infectious diseases, such as COVID-19.

摘要

发热仍然是急性传染病管理中不可或缺的一部分,尤其是对于那些没有有效治疗方法的疾病而言。然而,关于“发热”的广泛误解以及不同机构令人困惑的指南(这些误解和指南在2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间有所加剧,且容易产生不同解读),可能会使全体人群无法从发热中受益。建议对37.8 - 39°C的发热进行退热治疗的指南令人担忧,因为39°C可增强保护性热休克和免疫反应(体液免疫、细胞介导免疫和营养免疫),而≥40°C会启动/增强抗病毒反应并限制适应高温的病原体,例如严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)、流感毒株和麻疹病毒。鉴于公共领域存在相互矛盾的指南可能产生的公共卫生后果,因此迫切需要关注这一情况。在本文中,我们试图重申发热在疾病解决中的益处,消除误解,并强调国家治疗指南与世界卫生组织指南保持一致的必要性,以促进恰当的做法并降低诸如COVID-19等传染病的发病率和死亡率。

相似文献

4
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and pregnancy.2019 冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行与妊娠。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jun;222(6):521-531. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.03.021. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
5
Current Strategies of Antiviral Drug Discovery for COVID-19.新型冠状病毒肺炎抗病毒药物研发的当前策略
Front Mol Biosci. 2021 May 13;8:671263. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.671263. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

4
Traditional Medicine and COVID-19.传统医学与新冠肺炎
J Ayurveda Integr Med. 2021 Jul-Sep;12(3):413-414. doi: 10.1016/j.jaim.2021.07.015. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
9
Fever management in COVID-19 patients.新冠病毒肺炎患者的发热管理
Minerva Anestesiol. 2021 Jan;87(1):1-3. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.20.15195-2. Epub 2020 Nov 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验