Farina Mirko, Lavazza Andrea
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Innopolis University, Innopolis, Russia.
Centro Universitario Internazionale, Arezzo, Italy.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Mar 4;16:826862. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.826862. eCollection 2022.
While research to improve memory or counter decay caused by neurodegenerative diseases has a fairly long history, scientific attempts to erase memories are very recent. The use of non-invasive brain stimulation for memory modulation represents a new and promising application for the treatment of certain disorders [such as Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)]. However, numerous ethical issues are related to memory intervention. In particular, the possibility of using forms of non-invasive brain stimulation requires to distinguish treatment interventions from the enhancement of the healthy. Furthermore, a range of important societal and legal concerns arise when manipulating memories. In this short contribution, we address some of the most significant ethical, social, and legal implications surrounding the application of memory-modulation techniques and offer a series of reflections and considerations, which we hope can be of use to guide -and perhaps regulate- their potential, future implementation in society.
虽然改善记忆力或对抗神经退行性疾病引起的衰退的研究历史相当悠久,但科学上尝试消除记忆却是最近才有的事。使用非侵入性脑刺激来调节记忆是治疗某些疾病(如创伤后应激障碍)的一种新的、有前景的应用。然而,众多伦理问题与记忆干预相关。特别是,使用非侵入性脑刺激形式的可能性要求区分治疗干预和对健康人的增强。此外,在操纵记忆时会出现一系列重要的社会和法律问题。在这篇简短的文章中,我们探讨了围绕记忆调节技术应用的一些最重要的伦理、社会和法律影响,并提供了一系列思考和考量,我们希望这些能有助于指导——或许还能规范——它们未来在社会中的潜在应用。