Schubring C, Werner E
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1986 Jul;46(7):459-61. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1036236.
In a retrospective study covering 161 patients, postoperative discharge of urine by means of a suprapubic catheter (SPC) and a transurethral indwelling catheter (TIC) following vaginal hysterectomy with reconstructive surgery were compared. The incidence of urinary tract infections differed clearly in the two groups, though not significantly (SPC 20.9%, TIC 37.2%). The SPC has clear advantages, causing fewer micturition difficulties and being more readily accepted. Isolated complications such as macrohematuria, bladder tamponade, and blocking of the catheter represent disadvantages of the SPC as compared to the TIC.
在一项涵盖161例患者的回顾性研究中,对阴道子宫切除术后进行重建手术时通过耻骨上导管(SPC)和经尿道留置导管(TIC)排尿的情况进行了比较。两组的尿路感染发生率有明显差异,但无统计学意义(SPC为20.9%,TIC为37.2%)。SPC有明显优势,排尿困难较少,更容易被接受。与TIC相比,诸如肉眼血尿、膀胱填塞和导管堵塞等孤立并发症是SPC的缺点。