• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较深度学习模型和传统机器学习模型用于根据现病史记录预测精神疾病的情况。

Comparing Deep Learning and Conventional Machine Learning Models for Predicting Mental Illness from History of Present Illness Notations.

作者信息

Shrestha Ingroj, Srinivasan Padmini

机构信息

University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, United States.

出版信息

AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2022 Feb 21;2021:1109-1118. eCollection 2021.

PMID:35308915
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8861709/
Abstract

Mental illness, a serious problem across the globe, requires multi-pronged solutions including effective computational models to predict illness. Mental illness diagnosis is complicated by the pronounced sharing of symptoms and mutual pre-dispositions. Set in this context we offer a systematic comparison of seven deep learning and two conventional machine learning models for predicting mental illness from the history of present illness free-text descriptions in patient records. The models tested include a new architecture CB-MH which ranks best for F1 (0.62) while another attention model is best for F2 (0.71). We also explore model decisions using Integrated Gradients interpretability method which we use to identify key influential features. Overall, the majority of true positives have key features appearing in meaningful contexts. False negatives are most challenging with most key features appearing in unclear contexts. False positives are mostly true positives in actuality as supported by a small-scale clinician-based user judgement study.

摘要

精神疾病是全球范围内的一个严重问题,需要多方面的解决方案,包括有效的计算模型来预测疾病。精神疾病的诊断因症状的显著重叠和相互易感性而变得复杂。在此背景下,我们对七种深度学习模型和两种传统机器学习模型进行了系统比较,这些模型用于根据患者记录中现病史的自由文本描述来预测精神疾病。测试的模型包括一种新架构CB-MH,其F1得分最高(0.62),而另一种注意力模型在F2方面表现最佳(0.71)。我们还使用集成梯度可解释性方法探索模型决策,该方法用于识别关键影响特征。总体而言,大多数真阳性在有意义的上下文中具有关键特征。假阴性最具挑战性,大多数关键特征出现在不明确的上下文中。根据一项基于小规模临床医生的用户判断研究,误报实际上大多是真阳性。

相似文献

1
Comparing Deep Learning and Conventional Machine Learning Models for Predicting Mental Illness from History of Present Illness Notations.比较深度学习模型和传统机器学习模型用于根据现病史记录预测精神疾病的情况。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2022 Feb 21;2021:1109-1118. eCollection 2021.
2
Machine learning random forest for predicting oncosomatic variant NGS analysis.机器学习随机森林预测肿瘤体细胞变异 NGS 分析。
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 8;11(1):21820. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01253-y.
3
Impact of De-Identification on Clinical Text Classification Using Traditional and Deep Learning Classifiers.去识别化对使用传统和深度学习分类器的临床文本分类的影响。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019 Aug 21;264:283-287. doi: 10.3233/SHTI190228.
4
A comparison of machine learning algorithms for the surveillance of autism spectrum disorder.机器学习算法在自闭症谱系障碍监测中的比较。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 25;14(9):e0222907. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222907. eCollection 2019.
5
Use of a Machine Learning Program to Correctly Triage Incoming Text Messaging Replies From a Cardiovascular Text-Based Secondary Prevention Program: Feasibility Study.使用机器学习程序正确分诊心血管基于文本的二级预防计划的传入短信回复:可行性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jun 16;8(6):e19200. doi: 10.2196/19200.
6
Comparison of Deep-Learning and Conventional Machine-Learning Methods for the Automatic Recognition of the Hepatocellular Carcinoma Areas from Ultrasound Images.深度学习与传统机器学习方法在自动识别超声图像肝癌区域的比较。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 May 29;20(11):3085. doi: 10.3390/s20113085.
7
Evaluating shallow and deep learning strategies for the 2018 n2c2 shared task on clinical text classification.评估浅层和深度学习策略在 2018 n2c2 临床文本分类共享任务中的应用。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Nov 1;26(11):1247-1254. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz149.
8
Applying interpretable deep learning models to identify chronic cough patients using EHR data.应用可解释的深度学习模型,利用电子病历数据识别慢性咳嗽患者。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2021 Oct;210:106395. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106395. Epub 2021 Sep 4.
9
Deep Learning versus Conventional Machine Learning for Detection of Healthcare-Associated Infections in French Clinical Narratives.深度学习与传统机器学习在法语临床记录中检测医疗相关感染的比较
Methods Inf Med. 2019 Jun;58(1):31-41. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1677692. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
10
Deep learning in diabetic foot ulcers detection: A comprehensive evaluation.深度学习在糖尿病足溃疡检测中的应用:全面评估。
Comput Biol Med. 2021 Aug;135:104596. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104596. Epub 2021 Jun 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Multiclassification of the symptom severity of social anxiety disorder using digital phenotypes and feature representation learning.利用数字表型和特征表示学习对社交焦虑障碍症状严重程度进行多分类
Digit Health. 2024 May 22;10:20552076241256730. doi: 10.1177/20552076241256730. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Deep learning in mental health outcome research: a scoping review.深度学习在精神健康结局研究中的应用:范围综述。
Transl Psychiatry. 2020 Apr 22;10(1):116. doi: 10.1038/s41398-020-0780-3.
2
The hidden links between mental disorders.精神障碍之间的隐藏联系。
Nature. 2020 May;581(7806):19-21. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-00922-8.
3
Deep learning in clinical natural language processing: a methodical review.深度学习在临床自然语言处理中的应用:系统综述。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Mar 1;27(3):457-470. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz200.
4
BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining.BioBERT:一种用于生物医学文本挖掘的预训练生物医学语言表示模型。
Bioinformatics. 2020 Feb 15;36(4):1234-1240. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz682.
5
Review of Machine Learning Algorithms for Diagnosing Mental Illness.用于诊断精神疾病的机器学习算法综述
Psychiatry Investig. 2019 Apr;16(4):262-269. doi: 10.30773/pi.2018.12.21.2. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
6
Assessing the severity of positive valence symptoms in initial psychiatric evaluation records: Should we use convolutional neural networks?评估初始精神评估记录中积极效价症状的严重程度:我们是否应该使用卷积神经网络?
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 16;13(10):e0204493. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204493. eCollection 2018.
7
Deep EHR: A Survey of Recent Advances in Deep Learning Techniques for Electronic Health Record (EHR) Analysis.深度电子健康记录(EHR):深度学习技术在电子健康记录(EHR)分析中的最新进展综述。
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2018 Sep;22(5):1589-1604. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2017.2767063. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
8
Applying deep neural networks to unstructured text notes in electronic medical records for phenotyping youth depression.应用深度神经网络对电子病历中的非结构化文本记录进行青年抑郁表型分析。
Evid Based Ment Health. 2017 Aug;20(3):83-87. doi: 10.1136/eb-2017-102688. Epub 2017 Jul 24.
9
Predicting mental conditions based on "history of present illness" in psychiatric notes with deep neural networks.基于精神科病历中的“现病史”用深度神经网络预测精神状况。
J Biomed Inform. 2017 Nov;75S:S138-S148. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.06.010. Epub 2017 Jun 10.
10
The use of electronic health records for psychiatric phenotyping and genomics.电子健康记录在精神表型和基因组学中的应用。
Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2018 Oct;177(7):601-612. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.32548. Epub 2017 May 30.