Suppr超能文献

经皮经肝胆道引流转换为内镜超声引导下胆道引流。

Conversion of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage to endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage.

作者信息

Morita Shinichi, Sugawara Shunsuke, Suda Takeshi, Hoshi Takahiro, Abe Satoshi, Yagi Kazuyoshi, Terai Shuji

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Uonuma Institute of Community Medicine Niigata University Hospital Niigata Japan.

Department of Diagnostic Radiology National Cancer Center Hospital Tokyo Japan.

出版信息

DEN Open. 2021 Apr 21;1(1):e6. doi: 10.1002/deo2.6. eCollection 2021 Apr.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) is a useful alternative treatment for malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) when patients have difficulty with endoscopic transpapillary drainage. We examined the feasibility of conversion of PTBD to endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) in patients with MBO unsuited for endoscopic transpapillary biliary drainage.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients who underwent conversion of PTBD to EUS-BD between March 2017 and December 2019. Eligible patients had unresectable MBO, required palliative biliary drainage, and were not suited for endoscopic transpapillary drainage. Initial PTBD had been performed for acute cholangitis or obstructive jaundice in all patients. EUS-BD was performed following improvements in cholangitis. Sixteen patients underwent conversion of PTBD to EUS-BD. We evaluated technical success, procedure time, clinical success (defined as subsequent external catheter removal), adverse events (AEs), time to recurrent biliary obstruction (TRBO), and re-intervention rates.

RESULTS

Technical success was achieved in all patients (100%). The median procedure time was 45.0 minutes (interquartile range [IQR] 30.0-50.0 minutes). Clinical success was achieved in all patients (100%). There were mild early AEs in two patients (12.5%) (acute cholangitis: 1, bile peritonitis: 1), which improved with antibiotic administration alone. Recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) occurred in six patients (37.5%). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a 50% TRBO of 95 days (IQR 41-246 days). Endoscopic treatment was possible in all RBO cases, and repeat PTBD was not required.

CONCLUSIONS

Conversion of PTBD to EUS-BD for the management of MBO is both feasible and safe. This approach is expected to be widely practiced at centers with little experience in EUS-BD.

摘要

引言

当患者难以进行内镜乳头胆管引流时,经皮经肝胆道引流(PTBD)是恶性胆管梗阻(MBO)的一种有效替代治疗方法。我们研究了在不适合内镜乳头胆管引流的MBO患者中,将PTBD转换为内镜超声引导下胆管引流(EUS-BD)的可行性。

方法

这项回顾性研究纳入了2017年3月至2019年12月期间接受PTBD转换为EUS-BD的患者。符合条件的患者患有不可切除的MBO,需要姑息性胆管引流,且不适合内镜乳头胆管引流。所有患者最初均因急性胆管炎或梗阻性黄疸而进行了PTBD。在胆管炎改善后进行EUS-BD。16例患者接受了PTBD转换为EUS-BD。我们评估了技术成功率、手术时间、临床成功率(定义为随后拔除外部导管)、不良事件(AE)、复发性胆管梗阻时间(TRBO)和再次干预率。

结果

所有患者均获得技术成功(100%)。中位手术时间为45.0分钟(四分位间距[IQR]30.0-50.0分钟)。所有患者均获得临床成功(100%)。两名患者(12.5%)出现轻度早期AE(急性胆管炎:1例,胆汁性腹膜炎:1例),仅通过抗生素治疗即可改善。6例患者(37.5%)发生复发性胆管梗阻(RBO)。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,TRBO为95天的发生率为50%(IQR 41-246天)。所有RBO病例均可行内镜治疗,无需重复PTBD。

结论

将PTBD转换为EUS-BD用于MBO的治疗是可行且安全的。这种方法有望在EUS-BD经验较少的中心广泛应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/979a/8828224/d397a92c07be/DEO2-1-e6-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验