Suppr超能文献

在既往有胆道支架置入的患者中,通过临时鼻胆管引流放置转换为内镜超声引导下胆道引流。

Conversion to endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage by temporary nasobiliary drainage placement in patients with prior biliary stenting.

作者信息

Nakai Yousuke, Isayama Hiroyuki, Yamamoto Natsuyo, Matsubara Saburo, Ito Yukiko, Sasahira Naoki, Umefune Gyotane, Takahara Naminatsu, Hamada Tsuyoshi, Mohri Dai, Kogure Hirofumi, Tada Minoru, Koike Kazuhiko

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo; Department of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Metropolitan Police Hospital, , Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Endosc Ultrasound. 2017 Sep-Oct;6(5):323-328. doi: 10.4103/2303-9027.199763.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD), first reported as an alternative to percutaneous transhepatic BD in failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiography, is sometimes performed as reintervention for transpapillary stent dysfunction such as in patients with new onset gastric outlet obstruction, but direct conversion to EUS-BD can potentially have a risk of leakage of infected bile. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of conversion to EUS-BD using a temporary endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) tube placement as a reintervention for prior BD.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixteen patients with prior BD for malignant biliary obstruction undergoing conversion to EUS-BD using a temporary ENBD tube placement were studied. Technical and clinical success rate and adverse events were evaluated.

RESULTS

The major reason for conversion to EUS-BD was recurrent cholangitis due to duodenobiliary reflux (n = 13). In 14 patients with an indwelling covered metal or plastic stent, the stents were removed before temporary ENBD placement. After a median duration of 6 days, subsequent conversion to EUS-BD using a covered metal stent was performed, which was technically and clinically successful in all 16 patients (14 hepaticogastrostomy and 2 choledochoduodenostomy). Adverse events were observed in 3 patients (19%): one bleeding, one cholecystitis, and one cholangitis. No bile leak, peritonitis, or sepsis was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Conversion to EUS-BD using temporary ENBD tube placement in patients with prior BD was technically feasible and relatively safe without infectious complications related to bile leakage.

摘要

背景与目的

内镜超声引导下胆道引流术(EUS-BD)首次报道是作为经皮经肝胆道引流术在经内镜逆行胆管造影失败时的替代方法,有时也用于对经乳头支架功能障碍进行再次干预,比如新发胃出口梗阻的患者,但直接转换为EUS-BD可能存在感染性胆汁漏出的风险。本研究的目的是评估使用临时内镜鼻胆管引流(ENBD)管置入作为先前胆道引流的再次干预措施转换为EUS-BD的安全性和有效性。

患者与方法

对16例先前因恶性胆道梗阻行胆道引流并使用临时ENBD管置入转换为EUS-BD的患者进行了研究。评估了技术成功率、临床成功率和不良事件。

结果

转换为EUS-BD的主要原因是十二指肠胆管反流导致的复发性胆管炎(n = 13)。在14例留置覆膜金属或塑料支架的患者中,在临时ENBD置入前取出了支架。中位持续6天后,随后使用覆膜金属支架转换为EUS-BD,16例患者在技术和临床方面均获成功(14例行肝胃吻合术,2例行胆总管十二指肠吻合术)。3例患者(19%)出现不良事件:1例出血、1例胆囊炎和1例胆管炎。未观察到胆汁漏、腹膜炎或脓毒症。

结论

对于先前已行胆道引流的患者,使用临时ENBD管置入转换为EUS-BD在技术上是可行的且相对安全,无与胆汁漏相关的感染性并发症。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d47a/5664853/0cc647ff6081/EUS-6-323-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验