Nakai Yousuke, Isayama Hiroyuki, Yamamoto Natsuyo, Matsubara Saburo, Ito Yukiko, Sasahira Naoki, Umefune Gyotane, Takahara Naminatsu, Hamada Tsuyoshi, Mohri Dai, Kogure Hirofumi, Tada Minoru, Koike Kazuhiko
Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo; Department of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Metropolitan Police Hospital, , Tokyo, Japan.
Endosc Ultrasound. 2017 Sep-Oct;6(5):323-328. doi: 10.4103/2303-9027.199763.
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD), first reported as an alternative to percutaneous transhepatic BD in failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiography, is sometimes performed as reintervention for transpapillary stent dysfunction such as in patients with new onset gastric outlet obstruction, but direct conversion to EUS-BD can potentially have a risk of leakage of infected bile. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of conversion to EUS-BD using a temporary endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) tube placement as a reintervention for prior BD.
Sixteen patients with prior BD for malignant biliary obstruction undergoing conversion to EUS-BD using a temporary ENBD tube placement were studied. Technical and clinical success rate and adverse events were evaluated.
The major reason for conversion to EUS-BD was recurrent cholangitis due to duodenobiliary reflux (n = 13). In 14 patients with an indwelling covered metal or plastic stent, the stents were removed before temporary ENBD placement. After a median duration of 6 days, subsequent conversion to EUS-BD using a covered metal stent was performed, which was technically and clinically successful in all 16 patients (14 hepaticogastrostomy and 2 choledochoduodenostomy). Adverse events were observed in 3 patients (19%): one bleeding, one cholecystitis, and one cholangitis. No bile leak, peritonitis, or sepsis was observed.
Conversion to EUS-BD using temporary ENBD tube placement in patients with prior BD was technically feasible and relatively safe without infectious complications related to bile leakage.
内镜超声引导下胆道引流术(EUS-BD)首次报道是作为经皮经肝胆道引流术在经内镜逆行胆管造影失败时的替代方法,有时也用于对经乳头支架功能障碍进行再次干预,比如新发胃出口梗阻的患者,但直接转换为EUS-BD可能存在感染性胆汁漏出的风险。本研究的目的是评估使用临时内镜鼻胆管引流(ENBD)管置入作为先前胆道引流的再次干预措施转换为EUS-BD的安全性和有效性。
对16例先前因恶性胆道梗阻行胆道引流并使用临时ENBD管置入转换为EUS-BD的患者进行了研究。评估了技术成功率、临床成功率和不良事件。
转换为EUS-BD的主要原因是十二指肠胆管反流导致的复发性胆管炎(n = 13)。在14例留置覆膜金属或塑料支架的患者中,在临时ENBD置入前取出了支架。中位持续6天后,随后使用覆膜金属支架转换为EUS-BD,16例患者在技术和临床方面均获成功(14例行肝胃吻合术,2例行胆总管十二指肠吻合术)。3例患者(19%)出现不良事件:1例出血、1例胆囊炎和1例胆管炎。未观察到胆汁漏、腹膜炎或脓毒症。
对于先前已行胆道引流的患者,使用临时ENBD管置入转换为EUS-BD在技术上是可行的且相对安全,无与胆汁漏相关的感染性并发症。