• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超越英语:心理文本分析中的语言与文化考量

Beyond English: Considering Language and Culture in Psychological Text Analysis.

作者信息

Kučera Dalibor, Mehl Matthias R

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Faculty of Education, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, České Budějovice, Czechia.

Department of Psychology, College of Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 4;13:819543. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.819543. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.819543
PMID:35310262
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8931497/
Abstract

The paper discusses the role of language and culture in the context of quantitative text analysis in psychological research. It reviews current automatic text analysis methods and approaches from the perspective of the unique challenges that can arise when going beyond the default English language. Special attention is paid to closed-vocabulary approaches and related methods (and Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count in particular), both from the perspective of cross-cultural research where the analytic process inherently consists of comparing phenomena across cultures and languages and the perspective of generalizability beyond the language and the cultural focus of the original investigation. We highlight the need for a more universal and flexible theoretical and methodological grounding of current research, which includes the linguistic, cultural, and situational specifics of communication, and we provide suggestions for procedures that can be implemented in future studies and facilitate psychological text analysis across languages and cultures.

摘要

本文探讨了语言和文化在心理学研究定量文本分析背景下的作用。它从超越默认英语语言时可能出现的独特挑战的角度,回顾了当前的自动文本分析方法和途径。特别关注封闭词汇方法及相关方法(尤其是语言查询与字数统计),既从跨文化研究的角度,在该研究中分析过程本质上包括跨文化和跨语言比较现象,也从超越原始调查的语言和文化焦点的可推广性角度。我们强调当前研究需要更具普遍性和灵活性的理论与方法基础,其中包括沟通的语言、文化和情境细节,并且我们为未来研究中可实施的程序提供建议,以促进跨语言和跨文化的心理学文本分析。

相似文献

1
Beyond English: Considering Language and Culture in Psychological Text Analysis.超越英语:心理文本分析中的语言与文化考量
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 4;13:819543. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.819543. eCollection 2022.
2
Development of the Japanese Version of the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count Dictionary 2015.《语言调查与词频统计词典2015年日文版》的编制
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 7;13:841534. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.841534. eCollection 2022.
3
Closed- and open-vocabulary approaches to text analysis: A review, quantitative comparison, and recommendations.封闭式和开放式词汇方法在文本分析中的应用:综述、定量比较和建议。
Psychol Methods. 2021 Aug;26(4):398-427. doi: 10.1037/met0000349.
4
Psycholinguistic dataset on language use in 1145 novels published in English and Dutch.关于用英语和荷兰语出版的1145部小说中语言使用情况的心理语言学数据集。
Data Brief. 2020 Dec 16;34:106655. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.106655. eCollection 2021 Feb.
5
Performing Multilingual Analysis With Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count 2015 (LIWC2015). An Equivalence Study of Four Languages.使用2015语言调查与单词计数软件(LIWC2015)进行多语言分析:四种语言的等效性研究
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 12;12:570568. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.570568. eCollection 2021.
6
Languages for different health information readers: multitrait-multimethod content analysis of Cochrane systematic reviews textual summary formats.不同健康信息读者适用的语言:考科蓝系统评价文本摘要格式的多特质-多方法内容分析。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Apr 5;19(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0716-x.
7
Early lexical and syntactic development in Quebec French and English: implications for cross-linguistic and bilingual assessment.魁北克法语和英语的早期词汇及句法发展:对跨语言和双语评估的启示
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2005 Jul-Sep;40(3):243-78. doi: 10.1080/13682820410001729655.
8
Automated content analysis across six languages.跨六种语言的自动化内容分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 20;14(11):e0224425. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224425. eCollection 2019.
9
Improve word embedding using both writing and pronunciation.利用写作和发音来改进单词嵌入。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 10;13(12):e0208785. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208785. eCollection 2018.
10
Detecting depression of Chinese microblog users text analysis: Combining Linguistic Inquiry Word Count (LIWC) with culture and suicide related lexicons.检测中国微博用户的抑郁情绪:文本分析——结合语言调查词频统计(LIWC)与文化及自杀相关词汇
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Feb 9;14:1121583. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1121583. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
The relationship between language features and PTSD symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.语言特征与创伤后应激障碍症状之间的关系:一项系统综述与荟萃分析
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 31;16:1476978. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1476978. eCollection 2025.
2
Elucidating the emotional persona in the Romanian university students' academic discourse: a corpus-based exploration.剖析罗马尼亚大学生学术话语中的情感特征:基于语料库的探索
Front Psychol. 2025 Jan 20;15:1514795. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1514795. eCollection 2024.
3
Lingualyzer: A computational linguistic tool for multilingual and multidimensional text analysis.Lingualyzer:一种用于多语言和多维文本分析的计算语言学工具。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Sep;56(6):5501-5528. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02284-1. Epub 2023 Nov 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Personality and Word Use: Study on Czech Language and the Big Five.人格与词汇使用:捷克语与大五人格研究。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2022 Oct;51(5):1165-1196. doi: 10.1007/s10936-022-09892-6. Epub 2022 May 17.
2
Closed- and open-vocabulary approaches to text analysis: A review, quantitative comparison, and recommendations.封闭式和开放式词汇方法在文本分析中的应用:综述、定量比较和建议。
Psychol Methods. 2021 Aug;26(4):398-427. doi: 10.1037/met0000349.
3
Psycho-Linguistic Changes Associated With Historical Celebrities in Henan Using Classical Chinese Big Data.基于古汉语大数据的河南历史名人相关心理语言学变化
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 14;12:648677. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.648677. eCollection 2021.
4
Performing Multilingual Analysis With Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count 2015 (LIWC2015). An Equivalence Study of Four Languages.使用2015语言调查与单词计数软件(LIWC2015)进行多语言分析:四种语言的等效性研究
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 12;12:570568. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.570568. eCollection 2021.
5
Concluding Notes and Future Directions.总结性说明和未来方向。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2021 Feb;50(1):231-237. doi: 10.1007/s10936-020-09741-4. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
6
Cultural influences on word meanings revealed through large-scale semantic alignment.通过大规模语义对齐揭示词义的文化影响。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Oct;4(10):1029-1038. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0924-8. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
7
Machine learning and natural language processing in psychotherapy research: Alliance as example use case.机器学习和自然语言处理在心理治疗研究中的应用:以联盟为例的应用案例。
J Couns Psychol. 2020 Jul;67(4):438-448. doi: 10.1037/cou0000382.
8
Towards a Cognitive Science of the Human: Cross-Cultural Approaches and Their Urgency.迈向人类认知科学:跨文化方法及其紧迫性。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Aug;24(8):620-638. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.05.007. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
9
Emotion semantics show both cultural variation and universal structure.情绪语义既表现出文化差异,也表现出普遍结构。
Science. 2019 Dec 20;366(6472):1517-1522. doi: 10.1126/science.aaw8160.
10
Qualitative Assessment of Longitudinal Changes in Phenocopy Frontotemporal Dementia.表型模仿性额颞叶痴呆纵向变化的定性评估
Front Neurol. 2019 Nov 14;10:1207. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.01207. eCollection 2019.