Abe Seiichiro, Hirai Yuichiro, Uozumi Takeshi, Makiguchi Mai Ego, Nonaka Satoru, Suzuki Haruhisa, Yoshinaga Shigetaka, Oda Ichiro, Saito Yutaka
Endoscopy Division National Cancer Center Hospital Tokyo Japan.
Department of Internal Medicine Kawasaki Rinko General Hospital Kanagawa Japan.
DEN Open. 2021 Sep 20;2(1):e45. doi: 10.1002/deo2.45. eCollection 2022 Apr.
Endoscopic resection (ER) is an alternate minimally invasive treatment for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SESCC). We aimed to review the clinical indications and treatment outcomes of ER for SESCC. Endoscopic mucosal resection is relatively easy and efficient for SESCC ≤ 15 mm. In contrast, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is recommended to achieve en bloc resection for lesions >15 mm, in view of the accurate pathological evaluation. The Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society guidelines recommend ER for non-circumferential cT1a-EP/LPM (epithelium/lamina propria mucosae), cT1a-MM/T1b-SM1 (muscularis mucosa/superficial submucosa ≤ 200μm) SESCC, and whole-circumferential T1a-EP/LPM SESCC ≤ 50 mm (upon implementing preventive measures for stenosis), considering the risk-benefit balance of ER. It defines pT1a-EP/LPM without lymphovascular invasion as a curative endoscopic resection. The guidelines recommend additional esophagectomy or chemoradiotherapy for pT1b SESCC or any SESCC, with lymphovascular invasion. However, there is no recommendation for or against the administration of additional treatments for pT1a-MM without lymphovascular invasion, owing to limited evidence. Researchers have reported on high en bloc and R0 resection rates of ESD, and a randomized controlled trial demonstrated that clip-line traction-assisted ESD could significantly reduce the ESD procedural time. Moreover, steroid treatment has been developed to prevent post-ESD esophageal strictures. There have been reports on favorable long-term outcomes of ESD. However, most of them are retrospective studies. Further robust data in prospective trials are warranted to achieve a definitive evidence of ESD, which will be beneficial to patients with SESCC.
内镜切除术(ER)是浅表性食管鳞状细胞癌(SESCC)的一种替代性微创治疗方法。我们旨在回顾ER治疗SESCC的临床适应证和治疗结果。对于直径≤15mm的SESCC,内镜黏膜切除术相对简单且有效。相比之下,考虑到准确的病理评估,对于直径>15mm的病变,建议采用内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)以实现整块切除。日本胃肠内镜学会指南考虑到ER的风险效益平衡,推荐对非环周性cT1a-EP/LPM(上皮/黏膜固有层)、cT1a-MM/T1b-SM1(黏膜肌层/浅表黏膜下层≤200μm)的SESCC以及环周性T1a-EP/LPM且直径≤50mm的SESCC(采取狭窄预防措施后)进行ER治疗。该指南将无淋巴管侵犯的pT1a-EP/LPM定义为内镜根治性切除。对于pT1b的SESCC或任何伴有淋巴管侵犯的SESCC,指南推荐追加食管切除术或放化疗。然而,由于证据有限,对于无淋巴管侵犯的pT1a-MM是否进行追加治疗尚无推荐意见。研究人员报道了ESD的高整块切除率和R0切除率,一项随机对照试验表明,夹线牵引辅助ESD可显著缩短ESD手术时间。此外,已开发出类固醇治疗以预防ESD术后食管狭窄。有报道称ESD的长期预后良好。然而,其中大多数是回顾性研究。需要前瞻性试验中更有力的数据来获得ESD的确切证据,这将对SESCC患者有益。