Okuwaki Kosuke, Imaizumi Hiroshi, Kida Mitsuhiro, Masutani Hironori, Watanabe Masafumi, Adachi Kai, Tadehara Masayoshi, Tamaki Akihiro, Iwai Tomohisa, Yamauchi Hiroshi, Hasegawa Rikiya, Kaneko Toru, Kurosu Takahiro, Koizumi Wasaburo
Department of Gastroenterology Kitasato University School of Medicine Kanagawa Japan.
DEN Open. 2021 Jun 9;2(1):e21. doi: 10.1002/deo2.21. eCollection 2022 Apr.
We evaluated the usefulness of a newly developed system with which the total amount of whitish cores in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (EUS-FNAB) samples is automatically calculated (automated multiband imaging system [AMUS]).
From 30 prospectively enrolled patients suspected of having pancreatic cancer, four EUS-FNAB specimens per patient were obtained. Following AMUS calculations, two specimens were prepared after stereomicroscopy-guided manual division into whitish and reddish sections (isolation group), and the other two were prepared without such division (no-isolation group). The relation of the AMUS results pertaining to the length of the manually measured whitish cores (stereo-microscopically visible white core [SVWC]) and the sample suitability for pathologic evaluation were analyzed.
Histological diagnostic accuracy was 90%; median SVWC length, 14 mm; and median area of whitish core calculated using the AMUS, 13 mm. The SVWC length correlated with whitish core amount (ρ = 0.83, < 0.01) and adequacy score (ρ = 0.50, < 0.01). The whitish core amount correlated with the adequacy score (ρ = 0.40, < 0.01). The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve calculated for whitish core amount with respect to the histological diagnosis was 0.84 ( < 0.01; cutoff ≥ 8 mm, sensitivity 92.5%). Subgroup analysis (isolation vs. no-isolation group) revealed no significant between-group differences in the median histological adequacy ( = 0.27) or tumor cell content ratio ( = 0.28). The median scores for degree of blood contamination were significantly lower in the isolation group than in the no-isolation group ( < 0.01).
AMUS is a simple on-site verification procedure for determining the appropriate sampling tissue quantity for high diagnostic accuracy.
我们评估了一种新开发的系统的实用性,该系统可自动计算内镜超声引导下细针穿刺活检(EUS-FNAB)样本中白色核心的总量(自动多波段成像系统[AMUS])。
从30例疑似胰腺癌的前瞻性入组患者中,每位患者获取4份EUS-FNAB标本。在进行AMUS计算后,两份标本在立体显微镜引导下手动分为白色和红色部分后制备(分离组),另外两份标本不进行这种划分制备(非分离组)。分析了AMUS结果与手动测量的白色核心长度(立体显微镜下可见白色核心[SVWC])的关系以及样本对病理评估的适用性。
组织学诊断准确率为90%;SVWC长度中位数为14毫米;使用AMUS计算的白色核心面积中位数为13毫米。SVWC长度与白色核心量相关(ρ = 0.83,<0.01)和充足性评分相关(ρ = 0.50,<0.01)。白色核心量与充足性评分相关(ρ = 0.40,<0.01)。针对组织学诊断计算的白色核心量的受试者操作特征曲线下面积为0.84(<0.01;截断值≥8毫米,敏感性92.5%)。亚组分析(分离组与非分离组)显示,在组织学充足性中位数(= 0.27)或肿瘤细胞含量比(= 0.28)方面,组间无显著差异。分离组血液污染程度的中位数评分显著低于非分离组(<0.01)。
AMUS是一种简单的现场验证程序,用于确定合适的采样组织量以实现高诊断准确性。