• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在超声内镜引导下细针穿刺活检中使用滤纸进行宏观现场评估的影响。

The impact of macroscopic on-site evaluation using filter paper in EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy.

作者信息

Oh Dongwook, Seo Dong-Wan, Hong Seung-Mo, Song Tae Jun, Park Do Hyun, Lee Sang Soo, Lee Sung Koo, Kim Myung-Hwan

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Endosc Ultrasound. 2019 Sep-Oct;8(5):342-347. doi: 10.4103/eus.eus_34_19.

DOI:10.4103/eus.eus_34_19
PMID:31268010
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6791110/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

EUS-guided tissue acquisition with rapid on-site cytologic evaluation (ROSE) has been used to increase the diagnostic yield. However, ROSE is not available in many centers. To date, only a few studies have assessed the adequacy of histologic cores in macroscopic on-site evaluation (MOSE) during EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB). Blood contamination of histologic core specimens lowers the sample quality and the diagnostic yield. Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy of MOSE using filter paper to increase the adequacy of histologic core specimens while minimizing blood contamination.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-nine consecutive patients with an intraabdominal mass underwent EUS-FNB between March 2017 and October 2018. Histologic specimens obtained using EUS-FNB were expelled onto filter paper, and the histologic procurement rate on MOSE was evaluated.

RESULTS

EUS-FNB using a 20-gauge Procore needle or a 22-gauge Acquire needle was successful in all patients. The mean number of needle passes was 2.8 ss0.8. Visible histologic cores were observed in 94.9% (75/79) of the patients. Blood-contaminated specimens with scanty histologic cores were obtained in 5.1% (4/79) of the patients. On microscopic examination, 92.4% (73/79) of the histologic samples were graded as optimal. The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 94.5%, 94.3%, and 100%, respectively. Mild postprocedural adverse events occurred in 2 patients (2.5%: n = 1, transient fever; n = 1, acute pancreatitis).

CONCLUSIONS

MOSE using filter paper provided adequate histologic samples while minimizing blood contamination. MOSE can also increase the diagnostic accuracy when ROSE is not available.

摘要

背景与目的

内镜超声引导下组织获取联合快速现场细胞学评估(ROSE)已被用于提高诊断率。然而,许多中心无法开展ROSE。迄今为止,仅有少数研究评估了内镜超声引导下细针穿刺活检(EUS-FNB)过程中宏观现场评估(MOSE)时组织芯的充足性。组织芯标本的血液污染会降低样本质量和诊断率。因此,我们评估了使用滤纸进行MOSE的效果,以提高组织芯标本的充足性,同时尽量减少血液污染。

材料与方法

2017年3月至2018年10月期间,79例腹腔内肿块患者连续接受了EUS-FNB。使用EUS-FNB获取的组织标本被挤到滤纸上,并评估MOSE时的组织获取率。

结果

所有患者使用20G Procore针或22G Acquire针进行EUS-FNB均成功。平均穿刺针数为2.8±0.8次。94.9%(75/79)的患者观察到可见的组织芯。5.1%(4/79)的患者获得了血液污染且组织芯稀少的标本。显微镜检查显示,92.4%(73/79)的组织样本分级为最佳。诊断准确性、敏感性和特异性分别为94.5%、94.3%和100%。2例患者(2.5%:1例为短暂发热;1例为急性胰腺炎)出现轻度术后不良事件。

结论

使用滤纸进行MOSE可提供充足的组织样本,同时尽量减少血液污染。当无法开展ROSE时,MOSE也可提高诊断准确性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8aab/6791110/f4eeebebea84/EUS-8-342-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8aab/6791110/f4eeebebea84/EUS-8-342-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8aab/6791110/f4eeebebea84/EUS-8-342-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The impact of macroscopic on-site evaluation using filter paper in EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy.在超声内镜引导下细针穿刺活检中使用滤纸进行宏观现场评估的影响。
Endosc Ultrasound. 2019 Sep-Oct;8(5):342-347. doi: 10.4103/eus.eus_34_19.
2
Macroscopic on-site evaluation after EUS-guided fine needle biopsy may replace rapid on-site evaluation.超声内镜引导下细针穿刺活检后的宏观现场评估可能取代快速现场评估。
Endosc Ultrasound. 2021 Mar-Apr;10(2):111-115. doi: 10.4103/EUS-D-20-00113.
3
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy using macroscopic on-site evaluation technique reduces the number passes yet maintains a high diagnostic accuracy: A randomized study.使用宏观现场评估技术的内镜超声引导下细针穿刺活检减少穿刺次数但仍保持高诊断准确性:一项随机研究。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Dec;39(12):2625-2630. doi: 10.1111/jgh.16744. Epub 2024 Sep 17.
4
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy with or without macroscopic on-site evaluation: a randomized controlled noninferiority trial.内镜超声引导下细针穿刺活检加或不加现场大体评估:一项随机对照非劣效性试验
Endoscopy. 2023 Feb;55(2):129-137. doi: 10.1055/a-1915-5263. Epub 2022 Aug 31.
5
Macroscopic on-site evaluation of biopsy specimens for accurate pathological diagnosis during EUS-guided fine needle biopsy using 22-G Franseen needle.在使用22G Franseen针进行超声内镜引导下细针穿刺活检时,对活检标本进行宏观现场评估以实现准确的病理诊断。
Endosc Ultrasound. 2020 Nov-Dec;9(6):385-391. doi: 10.4103/eus.eus_49_20.
6
Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) versus macroscopic on-site evaluation (MOSE) for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic lesions: a paired comparative analysis using newer-generation fine needle biopsy needles.内镜超声引导下实性胰腺病变采样中快速现场评估(ROSE)与宏观现场评估(MOSE)的比较:使用新一代细针活检针的配对比较分析
Ann Gastroenterol. 2023 May-Jun;36(3):340-346. doi: 10.20524/aog.2023.0790. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
7
EUS-guided fine needle biopsy sampling using a novel fork-tip needle: a case-control study.EUS-引导下使用新型叉状针的细针活检采样:一项病例对照研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Dec;84(6):1034-1039. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.03.1405. Epub 2016 Mar 24.
8
Impact of Macroscopic On-Site Evaluation (MOSE) on Accuracy of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Biopsy (EUS-FNB) of Pancreatic and Extrapancreatic Solid Lesions: A Prospective Study.宏观现场评估(MOSE)对胰腺及胰腺外实性病变内镜超声引导下细针穿刺活检(EUS-FNB)准确性的影响:一项前瞻性研究
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Feb 7;12(2):428. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12020428.
9
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Biopsy Using 22G Franseen Needles without Rapid On-Site Evaluation for Diagnosis of Intraabdominal Masses.使用22G Franseen针进行内镜超声引导下细针穿刺活检,无需快速现场评估用于诊断腹腔内肿块
J Clin Med. 2022 Feb 17;11(4):1051. doi: 10.3390/jcm11041051.
10
Diagnostic accuracy of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling by macroscopic on-site evaluation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.EUS 引导下的细针活检取样的宏观现场评估的诊断准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 Dec;96(6):909-917.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.07.026. Epub 2022 Aug 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Pancreatobiliary Lymphadenopathy: Etiology, Location, and Factors Predicting Good Yield of Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Biopsy.胰胆淋巴结病:病因、位置及预测内镜超声引导下活检高取材率的因素
Euroasian J Hepatogastroenterol. 2024 Jan-Jun;14(1):40-43. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10018-1433.
2
Oil blotting paper for formalin fixation increases endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition-collected sample volumes on glass slides.油吸附纸固定福尔马林可增加内镜超声引导下组织采集-玻片采集标本量。
Cancer Med. 2024 May;13(9):e7189. doi: 10.1002/cam4.7189.
3
Comparison between three types of needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition of pancreatic solid masses: a multicenter observational study.

本文引用的文献

1
Macroscopic onsite evaluation using endoscopic ultrasound fine needle biopsy as an alternative to rapid onsite evaluation.使用内镜超声细针穿刺活检进行宏观现场评估作为快速现场评估的替代方法。
Endosc Int Open. 2019 Feb;7(2):E189-E194. doi: 10.1055/a-0770-2726. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
2
Gross visual inspection by endosonographers during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration.内镜超声引导下细针抽吸时内镜超声医师的肉眼大体观察。
Pancreatology. 2019 Jan;19(1):191-195. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2018.12.001. Epub 2018 Dec 2.
3
A multicenter randomized trial comparing a 25-gauge EUS fine-needle aspiration device with a 20-gauge EUS fine-needle biopsy device.
三种不同类型的针在超声内镜引导下胰腺实性肿块组织获取中的比较:一项多中心观察性研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 4;13(1):3677. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30920-5.
4
New image-processing technology for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy specimen evaluation in patients with pancreatic cancer.用于胰腺癌患者内镜超声引导下细针穿刺活检标本评估的新型图像处理技术
DEN Open. 2021 Jun 9;2(1):e21. doi: 10.1002/deo2.21. eCollection 2022 Apr.
5
Development of a Novel Evaluation Method for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Biopsy in Pancreatic Diseases Using Artificial Intelligence.一种使用人工智能的新型内镜超声引导下胰腺疾病细针穿刺活检评估方法的开发。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Feb 8;12(2):434. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12020434.
6
Impact of Macroscopic On-Site Evaluation (MOSE) on Accuracy of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Biopsy (EUS-FNB) of Pancreatic and Extrapancreatic Solid Lesions: A Prospective Study.宏观现场评估(MOSE)对胰腺及胰腺外实性病变内镜超声引导下细针穿刺活检(EUS-FNB)准确性的影响:一项前瞻性研究
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Feb 7;12(2):428. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12020428.
7
Usefulness of Macroscopic On-Site Evaluation Using a Stereomicroscope during EUS-FNB for Diagnosing Solid Pancreatic Lesions.使用立体显微镜进行 EUS-FNB 时对胰腺实体性病变进行宏观现场评估的作用。
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Jan 18;2022:2737578. doi: 10.1155/2022/2737578. eCollection 2022.
8
Confirming Whether Fine Needle Biopsy Device Shortens the Learning Curve of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition Without Rapid Onsite Evaluation.确认细针穿刺活检装置是否能在无快速现场评估的情况下缩短内镜超声引导下组织获取的学习曲线。
Clin Endosc. 2021 May;54(3):420-427. doi: 10.5946/ce.2020.184. Epub 2021 May 28.
9
Macroscopic on-site evaluation (MOSE) of specimens from solid lesions acquired during EUS-FNB: multicenter study and comparison between needle gauges.超声内镜引导下细针穿刺活检(EUS-FNB)获取的实体病变标本的宏观现场评估(MOSE):多中心研究及针径比较
Endosc Int Open. 2021 Jun;9(6):E901-E906. doi: 10.1055/a-1395-7129. Epub 2021 May 27.
10
Macroscopic on-site evaluation after EUS-guided fine needle biopsy may replace rapid on-site evaluation.超声内镜引导下细针穿刺活检后的宏观现场评估可能取代快速现场评估。
Endosc Ultrasound. 2021 Mar-Apr;10(2):111-115. doi: 10.4103/EUS-D-20-00113.
一项比较 25G EUS 细针抽吸装置与 20G EUS 细针活检装置的多中心随机试验。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Feb;89(2):329-339. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.10.026. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
4
Feasibility of a 20-gauge ProCore needle in EUS-guided subepithelial tumor sampling: a prospective multicenter study.20G ProCore针在EUS引导下进行上皮下肿瘤采样的可行性:一项前瞻性多中心研究。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2018 Oct 19;18(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12876-018-0880-1.
5
EUS-guided fine needle biopsy of pancreatic masses can yield true histology.超声内镜引导下胰腺肿块细针穿刺活检可获得真实的组织学结果。
Gut. 2018 Dec;67(12):2081-2084. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-315154. Epub 2017 Oct 7.
6
Technical aspects of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Guideline - March 2017.内镜超声(EUS)引导下胃肠病学采样的技术方面:欧洲胃肠道内镜学会(ESGE)技术指南 - 2017 年 3 月。
Endoscopy. 2017 Oct;49(10):989-1006. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-119219. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
7
Performance of a new needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy in patients with pancreatic solid lesions: A retrospective multicenter study.一种用于胰腺实性病变患者内镜超声引导下细针穿刺活检的新型针具的性能:一项回顾性多中心研究。
Endosc Ultrasound. 2018 Sep-Oct;7(5):329-334. doi: 10.4103/eus.eus_33_17.
8
A meta-analysis of endoscopic ultrasound-fine-needle aspiration compared to endoscopic ultrasound-fine-needle biopsy: diagnostic yield and the value of onsite cytopathological assessment.内镜超声引导下细针穿刺与内镜超声引导下细针活检的Meta分析:诊断率及现场细胞病理学评估的价值
Endosc Int Open. 2017 May;5(5):E363-E375. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-101693.
9
Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biopsy using a Franseen needle design: Initial assessment.使用 Franseen 针设计的内镜超声引导下活检:初步评估。
Dig Endosc. 2017 May;29(3):338-346. doi: 10.1111/den.12769. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
10
EUS-guided FNA for diagnosing autoimmune pancreatitis: Does it enhance existing consensus criteria?超声内镜引导下细针穿刺活检诊断自身免疫性胰腺炎:它是否增强了现有的共识标准?
Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Nov;84(5):805-807. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.05.046.