• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型胱抑素 C、乳酸、白细胞介素 6 和 N 末端 pro-B 型利钠肽(CLIP)在急性心肌梗死后心源性休克患者的死亡风险评分。

The novel cystatin C, lactate, interleukin-6, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (CLIP)-based mortality risk score in cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction.

机构信息

Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics, University Hospital, P.-List-Str. 13, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.

Institute of Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Eur Heart J. 2021 Jun 21;42(24):2344-2352. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab110.

DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab110
PMID:33647946
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cardiogenic shock (CS) complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI) still reaches excessively high mortality rates. This analysis is aimed to develop a new easily applicable biomarker-based risk score.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A biomarker-based risk score for 30-day mortality was developed from 458 patients with CS complicating AMI included in the randomized CULPRIT-SHOCK trial. The selection of relevant predictors and the coefficient estimation for the prognostic model were performed by a penalized multivariate logistic regression analysis. Validation was performed internally, internally externally as well as externally in 163 patients with CS included in the randomized IABP-SHOCK II trial. Blood samples were obtained at randomization. The two trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01927549 and NCT00491036), are closed to new participants, and follow-up is completed. Out of 58 candidate variables, the four strongest predictors for 30-day mortality were included in the CLIP score (cystatin C, lactate, interleukin-6, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide). The score was well calibrated and yielded high c-statistics of 0.82 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78-0.86] in internal validation, 0.82 (95% CI 0.75-0.89) in internal-external (temporal) validation, and 0.73 (95% CI 0.65-0.81) in external validation. Notably, it outperformed the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II and IABP-SHOCK II risk score in prognostication (0.83 vs 0.62; P < 0.001 and 0.83 vs. 0.76; P = 0.03, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

A biomarker-only score for 30-day mortality risk stratification in infarct-related CS was developed, extensively validated and calibrated in a prospective cohort of contemporary patients with CS after AMI. The CLIP score outperformed other clinical scores and may be useful as an early decision tool in CS.

摘要

背景

急性心肌梗死(AMI)并发心源性休克(CS)的死亡率仍然过高。本分析旨在开发一种新的易于应用的基于生物标志物的风险评分。

方法和结果

从随机 CULPRIT-SHOCK 试验中纳入的 458 例 CS 合并 AMI 患者中,建立了 30 天死亡率的基于生物标志物的风险评分。通过惩罚性多变量逻辑回归分析选择相关预测因子并估算预测模型的系数。在随机 IABP-SHOCK II 试验中纳入的 163 例 CS 患者中进行了内部、内部外部和外部验证。在随机分组时采集血样。这两项试验均在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册(NCT01927549 和 NCT00491036),已不再招募新的参与者,且随访已完成。在 58 个候选变量中,对 30 天死亡率有最强预测作用的四个指标被纳入 CLIP 评分(胱抑素 C、乳酸、白细胞介素-6 和 N 末端 B 型利钠肽前体)。该评分具有良好的校准度,内部验证的 C 统计量为 0.82[95%置信区间(CI)0.78-0.86],内部-外部(时间)验证为 0.82(95%CI 0.75-0.89),外部验证为 0.73(95%CI 0.65-0.81)。值得注意的是,它在预后方面优于简化急性生理学评分 II 和 IABP-SHOCK II 风险评分(0.83 比 0.62;P<0.001 和 0.83 比 0.76;P=0.03)。

结论

在 AMI 后 CS 患者的前瞻性队列中,我们开发了一种新的基于生物标志物的 30 天死亡率风险分层评分,进行了广泛的验证和校准。CLIP 评分优于其他临床评分,可能作为 CS 的早期决策工具有用。

相似文献

1
The novel cystatin C, lactate, interleukin-6, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (CLIP)-based mortality risk score in cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction.新型胱抑素 C、乳酸、白细胞介素 6 和 N 末端 pro-B 型利钠肽(CLIP)在急性心肌梗死后心源性休克患者的死亡风险评分。
Eur Heart J. 2021 Jun 21;42(24):2344-2352. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab110.
2
Fibroblast growth factor 23 in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: a biomarker substudy of the Intraaortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock II (IABP-SHOCK II) trial.急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克时的成纤维细胞生长因子23:心源性休克主动脉内球囊反搏II(IABP-SHOCK II)试验的生物标志物子研究
Crit Care. 2014 Dec 21;18(6):713. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0713-8.
3
Risk Stratification for Patients in Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction.心肌梗死后心源性休克患者的风险分层。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Apr 18;69(15):1913-1920. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.02.027.
4
Growth-differentiation factor 15 and osteoprotegerin in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: a biomarker substudy of the IABP-SHOCK II-trial.生长分化因子 15 和骨保护素在急性心肌梗死并发心源性休克中的变化:IABP-SHOCK II 试验的生物标志物亚研究。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2014 Aug;16(8):880-7. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.117. Epub 2014 Jun 5.
5
Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: the prospective, randomized IABP SHOCK Trial for attenuation of multiorgan dysfunction syndrome.主动脉内球囊反搏在急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者中的应用:前瞻性、随机的 IABP SHOCK 试验,用于减轻多器官功能障碍综合征。
Crit Care Med. 2010 Jan;38(1):152-60. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181b78671.
6
Angiopoietin-2 in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock--a biomarker substudy of the IABP-SHOCK II-Trial.急性心肌梗合并心原性休克患者中血管生成素 2 的变化——IABP-SHOCK II 试验的生物标志物亚研究。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2015 Nov;17(11):1152-60. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.342. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
7
Hemodynamic effects of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: the prospective, randomized IABP shock trial.主动脉内球囊反搏对急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者血流动力学的影响:前瞻性、随机 IABP 休克试验。
Shock. 2012 Apr;37(4):378-84. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e31824a67af.
8
Early risk stratification in patients with cardiogenic shock irrespective of the underlying cause - the Cardiogenic Shock Score.无论病因如何,对心源性休克患者进行早期风险分层——心源性休克评分。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2022 Apr;24(4):657-667. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2449. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
9
Culprit lesion location and outcome in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating myocardial infarction: a substudy of the IABP-SHOCK II-trial.心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者的罪犯病变部位与预后:IABP-SHOCK II试验的一项子研究
Clin Res Cardiol. 2016 Dec;105(12):1030-1041. doi: 10.1007/s00392-016-1017-6. Epub 2016 Jul 4.
10
Impella Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.经皮 Impella 辅助治疗伴心原性休克的急性心肌梗死。
Circulation. 2019 Mar 5;139(10):1249-1258. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.036614.

引用本文的文献

1
Interleukin-6 in Cardiogenic Shock.心源性休克中的白细胞介素-6
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2025 Aug 30;27(1):129. doi: 10.1007/s11886-025-02273-0.
2
Endothelin-1 in combination with CRB-65 enhance risk stratification in COVID-19 patients.内皮素-1与CRB-65联合使用可改善新冠病毒肺炎患者的风险分层。
Infection. 2025 Aug 19. doi: 10.1007/s15010-025-02627-4.
3
Lactate Metabolism and Lactylation Modification: New Opportunities and Challenges in Cardiovascular Disease.乳酸代谢与乳酸化修饰:心血管疾病中的新机遇与挑战
MedComm (2020). 2025 Jul 1;6(7):e70269. doi: 10.1002/mco2.70269. eCollection 2025 Jul.
4
Inflammatory Indices in Patients with Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock, and Their Interconnections with SCAI Stages and Patients' Survival: A Retrospective Study.心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者的炎症指标及其与SCAI分期和患者生存的相关性:一项回顾性研究
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 16;14(12):4283. doi: 10.3390/jcm14124283.
5
An Easy-to-Use Risk Stratification System for NSTE-ACS Patients Combining Autonomic Nervous System and Coronary Physiology.一种用于非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者的易于使用的风险分层系统,结合自主神经系统和冠状动脉生理学。
Int J Med Sci. 2025 Apr 28;22(10):2342-2353. doi: 10.7150/ijms.111214. eCollection 2025.
6
New Types of Post-Translational Modification of Proteins in Cardiovascular Diseases.心血管疾病中蛋白质翻译后修饰的新类型
J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2025 Mar 3. doi: 10.1007/s12265-025-10600-7.
7
Validation of a biomarker-based mortality score for cardiogenic shock patients: Comparison with a clinical risk score.基于生物标志物的心源性休克患者死亡率评分的验证:与临床风险评分的比较。
ESC Heart Fail. 2025 Jun;12(3):2157-2165. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.15234. Epub 2025 Feb 2.
8
ECPR combined with CRRT successfully rescues a patient who experienced sudden cardiac arrest for 152 minutes: A case report.体外心肺复苏联合连续性肾脏替代治疗成功救治一名心脏骤停152分钟的患者:病例报告
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jan 31;104(5):e41298. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041298.
9
Current and novel biomarkers in cardiogenic shock.心源性休克中的当前及新型生物标志物
Eur J Heart Fail. 2025 Jan 17. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.3531.
10
Identifying biomarker-driven subphenotypes of cardiogenic shock: analysis of prospective cohorts and randomized controlled trials.识别心源性休克的生物标志物驱动亚表型:前瞻性队列和随机对照试验分析
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Dec 18;79:103013. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.103013. eCollection 2025 Jan.