• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

默认道德反应的发展起源:从诚实到不诚实的转变。

The developmental origins of a default moral response: A shift from honesty to dishonesty.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.

Center for Cognition and Brain Disorders, Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.

出版信息

Child Dev. 2022 Jul;93(4):1154-1161. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13755. Epub 2022 Mar 21.

DOI:10.1111/cdev.13755
PMID:35312043
Abstract

People are sometimes tempted to lie for their own benefit if it would not harm others. For adults, dishonesty is the default response in these circumstances. The developmental origins of this phenomenon were investigated between 2019 and 2021 among 6- to 11-year-old Han Chinese children from China (N = 548, 49% female). Children had an opportunity to win prizes in a behavioral economics game (Experiment 1) or a temptation resistance game adapted from developmental psychology (Experiment 2). In each experiment, the youngest children showed a default tendency of honesty and there was an overall age-related shift toward a default tendency of dishonesty. These findings provide direct evidence of developmental change in the automatic and controlled processes that underlie moral behavior.

摘要

如果对他人没有伤害,人们有时会出于自身利益而说谎。对于成年人来说,在这种情况下不诚实是默认的反应。本研究于 2019 年至 2021 年在中国对 6 至 11 岁的汉族儿童(N=548,49%为女性)进行了调查,以探究这一现象的发展起源。在行为经济学游戏(实验 1)或改编自发展心理学的抵制诱惑游戏(实验 2)中,孩子们有机会赢得奖品。在每个实验中,最小的孩子都表现出了诚实的默认倾向,并且整体上随着年龄的增长,他们倾向于不诚实。这些发现为道德行为所基于的自动和控制过程的发展变化提供了直接证据。

相似文献

1
The developmental origins of a default moral response: A shift from honesty to dishonesty.默认道德反应的发展起源:从诚实到不诚实的转变。
Child Dev. 2022 Jul;93(4):1154-1161. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13755. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
2
Intuitive Honesty Versus Dishonesty: Meta-Analytic Evidence.直觉诚实与不诚实:元分析证据。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2019 Sep;14(5):778-796. doi: 10.1177/1745691619851778. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
3
Default settings affect children's decisions about whether to be honest.默认设置会影响孩子们关于是否诚实的决定。
Cognition. 2023 Jun;235:105390. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105390. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
4
Cognitive Control Promotes Either Honesty or Dishonesty, Depending on One's Moral Default.认知控制根据一个人的道德默认,要么促进诚实,要么促进不诚实。
J Neurosci. 2021 Oct 20;41(42):8815-8825. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0666-21.2021. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
5
A cross-cultural comparison of the relation between children's moral standards of honesty and their lie-telling behavior.儿童诚实道德标准与其说谎行为之间关系的跨文化比较。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2023 Jul;231:105665. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2023.105665. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
6
Parents' Attitudes about and Socialization of Honesty and Dishonesty in Typically-Developing Children and Children with Disruptive Behavior Disorders.父母对典型发展儿童和行为障碍儿童诚实与不诚实的态度及其社会化。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2019 Feb;47(2):299-312. doi: 10.1007/s10802-018-0444-4.
7
On being honest about dishonesty: The social costs of taking nuanced (but realistic) moral stances.关于坦诚面对不诚实行为:采取微妙(但现实)的道德立场所带来的社会成本。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2023 Aug;125(2):259-283. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000340. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
8
Can classic moral stories promote honesty in children?经典道德故事能否促进儿童诚实?
Psychol Sci. 2014 Aug;25(8):1630-6. doi: 10.1177/0956797614536401. Epub 2014 Jun 13.
9
Cognitive control and dishonesty.认知控制与不诚实行为。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2022 Sep;26(9):796-808. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2022.06.005. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
10
Overriding a moral default for honesty or dishonesty.凌驾于诚实或不诚实的道德默认之上。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Sep 8;117(36):21844-21846. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2014489117. Epub 2020 Aug 13.

引用本文的文献

1
An experimental investigation of association between children's lying and behavior problems.儿童说谎与行为问题之间关联的实验研究。
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 22;13:982012. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.982012. eCollection 2022.