Sanfelippo Luis César, Dagfal Alejandro Antonio
Neuquén 1390, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina
Calle 68 # 720, La Plata, Argentina
Psychoanal Q. 2020;89(1):119-141. doi: 10.1080/00332828.2020.1688549.
The relationship between trauma and memory disorders is not an essential one; in fact, its origins can be traced back to the 1890s, to the works of Janet and Freud. In this article, we focus on two brief but fundamental periods in the works of both of these authors (1892-1895 and 1913-1914). Against most contemporary literature on the subject, we argue that Freud's works gave much more importance than Janet's to the relationship between trauma, memory, and pathology. Furthermore, we reconstruct two essential parts of their debate: the discussion about the relevance of hereditary and accidental factors and the one about the function of memory within the framework of treatment. As bibliographic sources, we use theoretical and clinical works-allowing for a better appreciation of the relationship between trauma and memory in both authors' theories and practices.
创伤与记忆障碍之间的关系并非本质性的；事实上，其起源可追溯到19世纪90年代，即雅内（Janet）和弗洛伊德的著作问世之时。在本文中，我们聚焦于这两位作者著作中两个简短却至关重要的时期（1892 - 1895年和1913 - 1914年）。与大多数关于该主题的当代文献观点相悖，我们认为在创伤、记忆与病理学之间的关系上，弗洛伊德的著作比雅内的著作更为重视。此外，我们重构了他们争论的两个关键部分：关于遗传因素和偶然因素相关性的讨论，以及关于记忆在治疗框架内功能的讨论。作为文献来源，我们使用理论和临床著作，以便更好地理解两位作者理论与实践中创伤与记忆之间的关系。
