Khan Shabana, Mishra Jyoti, Ahmed Nova, Onyige Chioma Daisy, Lin Kuanhui Elaine, Siew Renard, Lim Boon Han
Indian Research Academy, India.
University of Leeds, United Kingdom.
Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2022 May;74:102903. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102903. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
In today's information age, both excess and lack of information can cause a disaster. COVID-19 pandemic not only highlighted the significance of risk communication but also pointed out several unintended and distressing consequences due to information gaps and miscommunications. Despite facing a common threat, the local communities suffered differential impacts during the pandemic. This paper classifies the nature of risk communications experienced across different countries into three categories, namely: inadequate, ideal, and infodemic risk communication that influenced the local perceptions and responses. It further argues that inadequately planned risk communications tend to create new risks and compromise the efforts towards managing a disaster. As global risks are responded locally, there is a need for more inclusive and engaging risk communication that involves communities as responsible stakeholders who understand, plan, and respond to risks to increase their propensity for resilience during disasters and crisis situations.
在当今信息时代,信息过多和信息匮乏都可能导致灾难。新冠疫情不仅凸显了风险沟通的重要性,还指出了由于信息差距和沟通不畅而产生的一些意外且令人苦恼的后果。尽管面临共同威胁,但当地社区在疫情期间受到的影响却各不相同。本文将不同国家经历的风险沟通性质分为三类,即:不充分的、理想的和信息疫情风险沟通,这些沟通影响了当地的认知和应对方式。本文进一步指出,规划不充分的风险沟通往往会产生新的风险,并损害应对灾难的努力。由于全球风险在地方层面应对,因此需要更具包容性和参与性的风险沟通,让社区作为负责任的利益相关者参与其中,他们理解、规划并应对风险,以增强其在灾难和危机情况下的复原能力。