Suppr超能文献

全球协定——《仙台框架》《可持续发展目标》和《联合国气候变化框架公约》中风险沟通的关键差距与影响:来自南亚热带地区城市的3个精选案例研究

Critical gaps and implications of risk communication in the global agreements-SFDRR, SDGs, and UNFCCC: 3 select case studies from urban areas of tropics in South Asia.

作者信息

Khan Shabana, Mishra Jyoti

机构信息

Indian Research Academy, New Delhi, India.

University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

出版信息

Nat Hazards (Dordr). 2022;111(3):2559-2577. doi: 10.1007/s11069-021-05148-z. Epub 2022 Jan 30.

Abstract

There has been a consistent rise in urban disasters, particularly in developing countries located in tropical areas. Among various challenges of disaster risk management and climate change impacts, it is noted that most residents are poorly informed about their risk exposure or apposite response. The paper is based on the premise that one important cause for this gap is inadequate emphasis on risk communication at different levels of planning and agreements. Accordingly, it highlights some important gaps in the risk communication across international agreements including Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction (SFDRR), Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), and evaluates their impacts at the local level. It brings three selected urban case studies located in the tropical areas of the South Asia region that illustrate gaps in risk communication that result in enhanced vulnerability and deviations in response. The findings are based on secondary data and literature focusing on global agreements, risk communication, and disaster response. The paper argues that even though global strategies address urban risks, the fragmented nature of risk communication results in poor response and contributes to losses that occur in disasters. Three critical gaps noted in risk communication include (i) it not prioritized at different levels, (ii) inadequate structures to measure its impacts and stakeholders inclusiveness, and (iii) indifference to cultural diversity and integration. Further, it is suggested that there is a need to redefine risk communication at the global scale that extends beyond warning generation and considers multiple factors influencing response including interlinked vulnerabilities and variations in perceptions emerging from varied geographical, socio-cultural, economic, and political processes.

摘要

城市灾害一直在持续增加,尤其是在热带地区的发展中国家。在灾害风险管理和气候变化影响的各种挑战中,人们注意到,大多数居民对自身面临的风险或适当的应对措施了解甚少。本文基于这样一个前提,即造成这种差距的一个重要原因是在不同规划和协议层面上对风险沟通的重视不足。因此,它突出了包括《仙台减少灾害风险框架》(SFDRR)、《可持续发展目标》(SDGs)和《联合国气候变化框架公约》(UNFCCC)在内的国际协议在风险沟通方面的一些重要差距,并评估了它们在地方层面的影响。它列举了位于南亚地区热带地区的三个选定城市案例研究,这些案例说明了风险沟通中的差距,这些差距导致脆弱性增加和应对偏差。研究结果基于侧重于全球协议、风险沟通和灾害应对的二手数据和文献。本文认为,尽管全球战略应对城市风险,但风险沟通的碎片化性质导致应对不力,并加剧了灾害中的损失。风险沟通中指出的三个关键差距包括:(i)在不同层面上未被优先考虑;(ii)缺乏衡量其影响和利益相关者包容性的结构;(iii)对文化多样性和融合漠不关心。此外,建议有必要在全球范围内重新定义风险沟通,这不仅包括发出警报,还应考虑影响应对的多个因素,包括相互关联的脆弱性以及不同地理、社会文化、经济和政治过程中出现的认知差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a467/8800833/e9d968f97130/11069_2021_5148_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验