Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.
Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.
World Neurosurg. 2022 Jun;162:47-56. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.03.051. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
BACKGROUND: Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations are present in 70% of World Health Organization grade II and III gliomas. IDH mutation induces accumulation of the oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate. Therefore, therapies targeting reversal of epigenetic dysregulation in gliomas have been suggested. However, the utility of epigenetic treatments in gliomas remains unclear. Here, we present the first clinical systematic review of epigenetic therapies in treatment of IDH-mutant gliomas and highlight their safety and efficacy. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of electronic databases from 2000 to January 2021 following PRISMA guidelines. Articles were screened to include clinical usage of epigenetic therapies in case reports, prospective case series, or clinical trials. Primary and secondary outcomes included safety/tolerability of epigenetic therapies and progression-free survival/overall survival, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 133 patients across 8 clinical studies were included in our analysis. IDH inhibitors appear to have the best safety profile, with an overall grade 3/grade 4 adverse event rate of 9%. Response rates to IDH-mutant inhibitors were highest in nonenhancing gliomas (stable disease achieved in 55% of patients). In contrast, histone deacetylase inhibitors demonstrate a lower safety profile with single-study adverse events as high as 28%. CONCLUSION: IDH inhibitors appear promising given their benign toxicity profile and ease of monitoring. Histone deacetylase inhibitors appear to have a narrow therapeutic index, as lower concentrations do not appear effective, while increased doses can produce severe immunosuppressive effects. Preliminary data suggest that epigenetic therapies are generally well tolerated and may control disease in certain patient groups, such as those with nonenhancing lesions.
背景:异柠檬酸脱氢酶 (IDH) 突变存在于 70%的世界卫生组织 (WHO) 二级和三级胶质瘤中。IDH 突变诱导致癌代谢物 2-羟戊二酸的积累。因此,已经提出了针对胶质瘤中表观遗传失调逆转的治疗方法。然而,表观遗传学治疗在胶质瘤中的应用仍不清楚。在这里,我们首次对 IDH 突变型胶质瘤中表观遗传学治疗进行了临床系统评价,并强调了它们的安全性和疗效。
方法:我们按照 PRISMA 指南对 2000 年至 2021 年 1 月的电子数据库进行了系统搜索。筛选出包括在病例报告、前瞻性病例系列或临床试验中使用表观遗传学治疗的文章。主要和次要结局分别为表观遗传学治疗的安全性/耐受性和无进展生存/总生存。
结果:共有 8 项临床研究中的 133 名患者纳入我们的分析。IDH 抑制剂的安全性似乎最好,总体 3/4 级不良事件发生率为 9%。在非增强性胶质瘤中,IDH 突变抑制剂的反应率最高(55%的患者达到稳定疾病)。相比之下,组蛋白去乙酰化酶抑制剂的安全性较差,单研究不良事件高达 28%。
结论:鉴于 IDH 抑制剂的良性毒性特征和易于监测,它们似乎很有前途。组蛋白去乙酰化酶抑制剂的治疗指数似乎较窄,因为较低的浓度似乎无效,而增加剂量会产生严重的免疫抑制作用。初步数据表明,表观遗传学治疗通常具有良好的耐受性,并可能在某些患者群体中控制疾病,例如那些具有非增强病变的患者。
World Neurosurg. 2022-6
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-2-6
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-1-22
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-8-23
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-3-2
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024-6-12
Cancers (Basel). 2024-8-2
Neuro Oncol. 2024-12-9
Neurooncol Adv. 2023-5-10
Cancers (Basel). 2022-10-14
Mod Pathol. 2021-7
J Clin Oncol. 2020-10-10
Oxf Med Case Reports. 2020-3-30
Neuro Oncol. 2020-8-17